RC LR LR LG LR

sarahlawg
Posts: 1001
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:59 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby sarahlawg » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:22 pm

The second LR was weird, and now I can't remember which one I felt stronger on... The RC was hard for me though as a first section, would have MUCH preferred it as a second section... Games were super easy though.. 9 minutes to spare.
Oh and I'm pretty sure my 1st LR had only 25 Qs...

explr
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:26 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby explr » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:34 pm

Did anyone have a question about houses on a street that were brick/two story? it think it was the second to last one on my third section.

sarahlawg
Posts: 1001
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:59 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby sarahlawg » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:42 pm

explr wrote:Did anyone have a question about houses on a street that were brick/two story? it think it was the second to last one on my third section.


I did, but that's about all I remember about it.

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:43 pm

explr wrote:Did anyone have a question about houses on a street that were brick/two story? it think it was the second to last one on my third section.


I had it. I'm hearing it's the real section. I had a shit fit with that section.

wjun15
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby wjun15 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:46 pm

wheres the chatroom?

User avatar
Lasers
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:47 pm

sarahlawg wrote:Oh and I'm pretty sure my 1st LR had only 25 Qs...

yeah, i think i remember that as well for me.

i think it was RC-27, LR-25, LR-26, LG-23, LR-26 for me.

User avatar
JDeterminedF
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:53 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby JDeterminedF » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:48 pm

JamesDean44 wrote:FML. Nailed the second section (first LR) which apparently means nada.


same here.. FML2

TonyStark123
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 8:13 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby TonyStark123 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:00 pm

I had this setup, and I am fairly confident that Section 3 was the experimental, but I am just basing that on the fact that I found it...odd, compared to the other ones. I really hope Section 3 was the experimental....

botbot93
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:23 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby botbot93 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:01 pm

Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.

User avatar
thegovernor
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:00 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby thegovernor » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:02 pm

the real lr was DEFINATELY section 3 or the one with the bacteria, antibiotic, and the analogy of chefs preparing a meal. I know this to be true because someone figured it out and got upset over it

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:03 pm

thegovernor wrote:the real lr was DEFINATELY section 3 or the one with the bacteria, antibiotic, and the analogy of chefs preparing a meal. I know this to be true because someone figured it out and got upset over it


Yeah but that's the 26 question one. I'm not sure why people are saying there were two 26 questions LR sections. There was two 25 question LR sections. And on real 26 question LR section. I'm 100% positive.

TonyStark123
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 8:13 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby TonyStark123 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:06 pm

Looks like we are just as far as ever from figuring this out. From reading over the posts I think that saying the first LR is definitively the experimental one is premature.....

EK14
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:04 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby EK14 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:10 pm

R LG RC LR LG

The first LG was Experimental for me, had to be...


The Experimental is almost ALWAYS before the break, i would say 98%? if not 100%.

A very very very fortunate layout for the test. No repeat of sections, and no double RC. Hope i did well!

User avatar
thegovernor
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:00 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby thegovernor » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:12 pm

the 2 and 3 lr both had 25 questions. i know this to be true because i work them backwards. 3, though much more difficult, was the real section. sec 2 was a pushover and it, of course, was a waste of energy and premature excitement

botbot93
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:23 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby botbot93 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:14 pm

botbot93 wrote:Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.


Anybody? Lot of E's? :?

User avatar
Lasers
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:14 pm

bartleby wrote:
thegovernor wrote:the real lr was DEFINATELY section 3 or the one with the bacteria, antibiotic, and the analogy of chefs preparing a meal. I know this to be true because someone figured it out and got upset over it


Yeah but that's the 26 question one. I'm not sure why people are saying there were two 26 questions LR sections. There was two 25 question LR sections. And on real 26 question LR section. I'm 100% positive.

i'm 100% positive i had two 26 question logical reasoning section (1 before the break and 1 after).

User avatar
Lasers
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:15 pm

botbot93 wrote:
botbot93 wrote:Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.


Anybody? Lot of E's? :?

yes, i think i noticed a lot of e's in one of my sections.

i didn't have many b's overall as well...probably not a good sign...sigh.

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:21 pm

So there were two different experimental LRs? So confusing now.

I'm sure two out of my three LRs had 25. My last section had 26.

Someone else (who works backwards) had two 25 and one 26, while this other guy is 100% certain he had two 26.

PANIC.

grover23
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:31 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby grover23 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:23 pm

i had RC LR LR LG LR and am positive that it went 27 questions, 26, 25, 23, 26

botbot93
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:23 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby botbot93 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:24 pm

Lasers wrote:
botbot93 wrote:
botbot93 wrote:Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.


Anybody? Lot of E's? :?

yes, i think i noticed a lot of e's in one of my sections.

i didn't have many b's overall as well...probably not a good sign...sigh.


Which section? RC?

User avatar
Lasers
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:24 pm

bartleby wrote:So there were two different experimental LRs? So confusing now.

I'm sure two out of my three LRs had 25. My last section had 26.

Someone else (who works backwards) had two 25 and one 26, while this other guy is 100% certain he had two 26.

PANIC.

HAHA yeah...lol.

i know for sure my section 2 was LR and i noted to myself it had 25 questions. then the next section had 26 questions and i thought, wow, this one must be the real one. then my last section (definitely real) had 26 questions, and i switched and presumed the third section was actually my experimental since i had two 26 question sections.

then i come here, and i'm confused all over again. :?

User avatar
Lasers
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:26 pm

botbot93 wrote:
Lasers wrote:
botbot93 wrote:
botbot93 wrote:Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.


Anybody? Lot of E's? :?

yes, i think i noticed a lot of e's in one of my sections.

i didn't have many b's overall as well...probably not a good sign...sigh.


Which section? RC?

my dearth of b's? i didn't have a lot of b's in my RC and my LR (had a quite a few e's in both). i was kind of second guessing myself...but whatever.

staroftony
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:14 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby staroftony » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:28 pm

ChiCubs14 wrote:I remember a question about Herbal Medicine and Standard Medicine...and an analogy being used with a cook making food for guests....

Anyone remember?


that one counts I had two LR so... my very first LR was redic hard

botbot93
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:23 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby botbot93 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:29 pm

[/quote]Anybody? Lot of E's? :?[/quote]
yes, i think i noticed a lot of e's in one of my sections.

i didn't have many b's overall as well...probably not a good sign...sigh.[/quote]

Which section? RC?[/quote]
my dearth of b's? i didn't have a lot of b's in my RC and my LR (had a quite a few e's in both). i was kind of second guessing myself...but whatever.[/quote]


NOOOOO!!!

E's. I'm only wondering about the E's!! E's in section 1, the RC section...I had like 7 in a row r something strange. As Bartelby says, PANIC!!!!

User avatar
Lasers
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:35 pm

botbot93 wrote:NOOOOO!!!

E's. I'm only wondering about the E's!! E's in section 1, the RC section...I had like 7 in a row r something strange. As Bartelby says, PANIC!!!!

oh you mean RC only? yeah...no way 7 E's in a row is correct. that's unheard of.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, Back2California, Baidu [Spider], batlaw, bcapace, HokieHi307, Instrumental, mrgstephe, Pozzo and 19 guests