RC LR LR LG LR Forum
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:09 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
anyone remember a question about alcohol consumption (think it was the first question) in my first LR? Is that the experimental one?
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
What about water causing pollution, was that real? I'm thinking it is the same section as the billion year old worm. Die.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:31 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
anyone remember a parallel reasoning about labrador retrievers in the first LR of RC LR LR LG LR?
- Gemini
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
I remember something about getting medicine from tropics and it was an assumption question.
I remember another assumption question on being praised or blamed for something and knowing more and the conclusion was to reject something about Toby or Tory or something.
Anyone remember those questions? They were difficult. I think it was the 3rd LR (section 5). The standard antibiotics and herbal remedies analogy was section five. What did you guys think of that question?
I remember another assumption question on being praised or blamed for something and knowing more and the conclusion was to reject something about Toby or Tory or something.
Anyone remember those questions? They were difficult. I think it was the 3rd LR (section 5). The standard antibiotics and herbal remedies analogy was section five. What did you guys think of that question?
- Sinra
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:15 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
I changed my original answer choice on the analogy one. I thought it was unnecessarily tricky (well necessarily for the lsat right?). I hope I changed it correctly. It was tough for me to figure it out. And rule of law got me too. I dunno. I hope I chose right.Gemini Hopeful wrote:I remember something about getting medicine from tropics and it was an assumption question.
I remember another assumption question on being praised or blamed for something and knowing more and the conclusion was to reject something about Toby or Tory or something.
Anyone remember those questions? They were difficult. I think it was the 3rd LR (section 5). The standard antibiotics and herbal remedies analogy was section five. What did you guys think of that question?
How weird was the parallel that was all worded strangely? I mean, I understood it but thought it was so weird.
Last edited by Sinra on Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Sinra
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:15 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
That was real.bartleby wrote:What about water causing pollution, was that real? I'm thinking it is the same section as the billion year old worm. Die.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:39 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
After first glance, I didn't see the answer in my head show up...then I chose the most simple answer...Gemini Hopeful wrote:I remember something about getting medicine from tropics and it was an assumption question.
I remember another assumption question on being praised or blamed for something and knowing more and the conclusion was to reject something about Toby or Tory or something.
Anyone remember those questions? They were difficult. I think it was the 3rd LR (section 5). The standard antibiotics and herbal remedies analogy was section five. What did you guys think of that question?
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:42 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
Hmm.. I had this pattern too but I was almost positive I had my 3 LRs as 25-25-26...crysmissmichelle wrote:I had this same pattern (RC LR LR LG LR)
First LR 26 questions
Second LR 25 questions
Third LR 26 questions
Having one of the 26 question ones be experimental would make it 101 questions.
- Sinra
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:15 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
Unfortch, I couldn't figure out which was the most simple!eads wrote:After first glance, I didn't see the answer in my head show up...then I chose the most simple answer...Gemini Hopeful wrote:I remember something about getting medicine from tropics and it was an assumption question.
I remember another assumption question on being praised or blamed for something and knowing more and the conclusion was to reject something about Toby or Tory or something.
Anyone remember those questions? They were difficult. I think it was the 3rd LR (section 5). The standard antibiotics and herbal remedies analogy was section five. What did you guys think of that question?
- Gemini
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
What was real? What section? Jeez, I wish I had an extra RC or LG... it would've been easier to figure out the exp.Sinra wrote:That was real.bartleby wrote:What about water causing pollution, was that real? I'm thinking it is the same section as the billion year old worm. Die.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
Gemini Hopeful wrote:I remember something about getting medicine from tropics and it was an assumption question.
I remember another assumption question on being praised or blamed for something and knowing more and the conclusion was to reject something about Toby or Tory or something.
Anyone remember those questions? They were difficult. I think it was the 3rd LR (section 5). The standard antibiotics and herbal remedies analogy was section five. What did you guys think of that question?
I remember cutting down the rain forest. I remember the herbal remedies for sure. No idea on the Toby/Tory though? What was that about?
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:31 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
does anyone know if the owls with goggles was real?
and if the question (it was the first question of a section) about the right to sell a business that one owns, was real?
please help... trying to figure out experimentall
and if the question (it was the first question of a section) about the right to sell a business that one owns, was real?
please help... trying to figure out experimentall
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:59 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
Ditto. Everyone who had LG or RC experimentals has already figured their experimental out. Us LR experimental takers have a much more difficult task, because each section had 25/26 topics rather tahn 4. We will probably never figure it outGemini Hopeful wrote:What was real? What section? Jeez, I wish I had an extra RC or LG... it would've been easier to figure out the exp.Sinra wrote:That was real.bartleby wrote:What about water causing pollution, was that real? I'm thinking it is the same section as the billion year old worm. Die.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JDeterminedF
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:53 am
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
if sec 2 was exp, i'm feelin pretty shitty now
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
I think the Question 1 on one of the LRs was Right to Sell Business and Question 1 on another was Decrease in Car Thefts...
So which one was experimental...or were they on the same section.
So which one was experimental...or were they on the same section.
- Gemini
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
Was Owls with goggles the fifth section? I'm recalling that it is... not sure though.grover23 wrote:does anyone know if the owls with goggles was real?
and if the question (it was the first question of a section) about the right to sell a business that one owns, was real?
please help... trying to figure out experimentall
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
Does anyone remember a parallel reasoning with polar bears?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:39 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
I think so...I was laughing at it when I read...recalled the Dec 09 LR about the cow on the mattressGemini Hopeful wrote:Was Owls with goggles the fifth section? I'm recalling that it is... not sure though.grover23 wrote:does anyone know if the owls with goggles was real?
and if the question (it was the first question of a section) about the right to sell a business that one owns, was real?
please help... trying to figure out experimentall
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:59 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
Anyone remember having an evaluate the argument question? was that real/experimental?
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:09 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
the right to sell one's business i had too, was that in your first or second LR section?
- Gemini
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
To really figure out which was experimental, we should talk to people who didn't have this section distribution, lol.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
The problem with figuring out LR sections is you have to ask individual questions, and then you go back and forth trying to remember which of the sections you saw the question in. Especially because either 2/3 was experimental, and they blur together pretty well.Gemini Hopeful wrote:To really figure out which was experimental, we should talk to people who didn't have this section distribution, lol.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:31 pm
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
kom25 wrote:the right to sell one's business i had too, was that in your first or second LR section?
i had this in my second LR of 3... where did you have it?
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:49 am
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:49 am
Re: RC LR LR LG LR
Anyone remember the whales skeleton question?
Last edited by Intimate on Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login