RC LR LR LG LR Forum

[sarahlawg]

The second LR was weird, and now I can't remember which one I felt stronger on... The RC was hard for me though as a first section, would have MUCH preferred it as a second section... Games were super easy though.. 9 minutes to spare.
Oh and I'm pretty sure my 1st LR had only 25 Qs...

[explr]

Did anyone have a question about houses on a street that were brick/two story? it think it was the second to last one on my third section.

[sarahlawg]

Did anyone have a question about houses on a street that were brick/two story? it think it was the second to last one on my third section.

I did, but that's about all I remember about it.

[bartleby]

Did anyone have a question about houses on a street that were brick/two story? it think it was the second to last one on my third section.

I had it. I'm hearing it's the real section. I had a shit fit with that section.

[wjun15]

wheres the chatroom?

[Lasers]

Oh and I'm pretty sure my 1st LR had only 25 Qs...

yeah, i think i remember that as well for me.

i think it was RC-27, LR-25, LR-26, LG-23, LR-26 for me.

[JDeterminedF]

FML. Nailed the second section (first LR) which apparently means nada.

same here.. FML2

[TonyStark123]

I had this setup, and I am fairly confident that Section 3 was the experimental, but I am just basing that on the fact that I found it...odd, compared to the other ones. I really hope Section 3 was the experimental....

[botbot93]

Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.

[thegovernor]

the real lr was DEFINATELY section 3 or the one with the bacteria, antibiotic, and the analogy of chefs preparing a meal. I know this to be true because someone figured it out and got upset over it

[bartleby]

the real lr was DEFINATELY section 3 or the one with the bacteria, antibiotic, and the analogy of chefs preparing a meal. I know this to be true because someone figured it out and got upset over it

Yeah but that's the 26 question one. I'm not sure why people are saying there were two 26 questions LR sections. There was two 25 question LR sections. And on real 26 question LR section. I'm 100% positive.

[TonyStark123]

Looks like we are just as far as ever from figuring this out. From reading over the posts I think that saying the first LR is definitively the experimental one is premature.....

[EK14]

R LG RC LR LG

The first LG was Experimental for me, had to be...


The Experimental is almost ALWAYS before the break, i would say 98%? if not 100%.

A very very very fortunate layout for the test. No repeat of sections, and no double RC. Hope i did well!

[thegovernor]

the 2 and 3 lr both had 25 questions. i know this to be true because i work them backwards. 3, though much more difficult, was the real section. sec 2 was a pushover and it, of course, was a waste of energy and premature excitement

[botbot93]

Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.

Anybody? Lot of E's?

[Lasers]

the real lr was DEFINATELY section 3 or the one with the bacteria, antibiotic, and the analogy of chefs preparing a meal. I know this to be true because someone figured it out and got upset over it

Yeah but that's the 26 question one. I'm not sure why people are saying there were two 26 questions LR sections. There was two 25 question LR sections. And on real 26 question LR section. I'm 100% positive.

i'm 100% positive i had two 26 question logical reasoning section (1 before the break and 1 after).

[Lasers]

Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.

Anybody? Lot of E's?

yes, i think i noticed a lot of e's in one of my sections.

i didn't have many b's overall as well...probably not a good sign...sigh.

[bartleby]

So there were two different experimental LRs? So confusing now.

I'm sure two out of my three LRs had 25. My last section had 26.

Someone else (who works backwards) had two 25 and one 26, while this other guy is 100% certain he had two 26.

PANIC.

[grover23]

i had RC LR LR LG LR and am positive that it went 27 questions, 26, 25, 23, 26

[botbot93]

Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.

Anybody? Lot of E's?

yes, i think i noticed a lot of e's in one of my sections.

i didn't have many b's overall as well...probably not a good sign...sigh.

Which section? RC?

[Lasers]

So there were two different experimental LRs? So confusing now.

I'm sure two out of my three LRs had 25. My last section had 26.

Someone else (who works backwards) had two 25 and one 26, while this other guy is 100% certain he had two 26.

PANIC.

HAHA yeah...lol.

i know for sure my section 2 was LR and i noted to myself it had 25 questions. then the next section had 26 questions and i thought, wow, this one must be the real one. then my last section (definitely real) had 26 questions, and i switched and presumed the third section was actually my experimental since i had two 26 question sections.

then i come here, and i'm confused all over again.

[Lasers]

Did anyone else notice a lot of E's in RC, the first section? I had like 5 or 6 E's in a row.

Anybody? Lot of E's?

yes, i think i noticed a lot of e's in one of my sections.

i didn't have many b's overall as well...probably not a good sign...sigh.

Which section? RC?

my dearth of b's? i didn't have a lot of b's in my RC and my LR (had a quite a few e's in both). i was kind of second guessing myself...but whatever.

[staroftony]

I remember a question about Herbal Medicine and Standard Medicine...and an analogy being used with a cook making food for guests....

Anyone remember?

that one counts I had two LR so... my very first LR was redic hard

[botbot93]

[/quote]Anybody? Lot of E's? [/quote]
yes, i think i noticed a lot of e's in one of my sections.

i didn't have many b's overall as well...probably not a good sign...sigh.[/quote]

Which section? RC?[/quote]
my dearth of b's? i didn't have a lot of b's in my RC and my LR (had a quite a few e's in both). i was kind of second guessing myself...but whatever.[/quote]


NOOOOO!!!

E's. I'm only wondering about the E's!! E's in section 1, the RC section...I had like 7 in a row r something strange. As Bartelby says, PANIC!!!!

[Lasers]

NOOOOO!!!

E's. I'm only wondering about the E's!! E's in section 1, the RC section...I had like 7 in a row r something strange. As Bartelby says, PANIC!!!!

oh you mean RC only? yeah...no way 7 E's in a row is correct. that's unheard of.