Experimental Section Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
alphagamma

Bronze
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by alphagamma » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:21 pm

tazmolover wrote:LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

I bombed the first LR section.

I remember some question on the 2nd LR I'm hoping it's not experimental.

Did anyone have any LR section that had a question about car theft and higher probability of getting arrested?

It also had questions about Kafka+burning his unpublished works and some question about Epicurus. Also another question about setting a max temperature on a stove...

Can anyone confirm if this section was real or experimental?
I didn't have Kafka, Epicurus, or stove temps. That must be your experimental.

I did have car theft, so, if the other section was experimental, then that one was real.

coffeetable

New
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:00 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by coffeetable » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:21 pm

Destined wrote:For those of you who didnt have:
RC- UN human rights
LR
LR
LG
LR

Do you remember a question about university students with high social spending and depression?

Will help figure out exactly which section was experimental

YES! My dummy was RC and I remember that question in my LR

User avatar
alphagamma

Bronze
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by alphagamma » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:22 pm

Dave wrote:I'm confused about something. I had two LGs and the first one was easy as hell, while the 2nd one was more difficult. Why would the easier one be experimental? I thought the harder one is usually experimental? That just seems counterproductive to include the harder one and decrease the overall scores.
Sometimes the LSAC groups a bunch of easy games together to test. Other times they may group a bunch of hard games together. Nobody knows the reasons for their mysterious ways...

eads

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:39 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by eads » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:24 pm

So what's your conclusion Destined? I had three LRs....can't remember as well
coffeetable wrote:
Destined wrote:For those of you who didnt have:
RC- UN human rights
LR
LR
LG
LR

Do you remember a question about university students with high social spending and depression?

Will help figure out exactly which section was experimental

YES! My dummy was RC and I remember that question in my LR

tazmolover

Bronze
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:24 pm

alphagamma wrote:
tazmolover wrote:LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

I bombed the first LR section.

I remember some question on the 2nd LR I'm hoping it's not experimental.

Did anyone have any LR section that had a question about car theft and higher probability of getting arrested?

It also had questions about Kafka+burning his unpublished works and some question about Epicurus. Also another question about setting a max temperature on a stove...

Can anyone confirm if this section was real or experimental?
I didn't have Kafka, Epicurus, or stove temps. That must be your experimental.

I did have car theft, so, if the other section was experimental, then that one was real.
Dammit should I cancel...

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Dave

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:31 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by Dave » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:26 pm

alphagamma wrote:
Dave wrote:I'm confused about something. I had two LGs and the first one was easy as hell, while the 2nd one was more difficult. Why would the easier one be experimental? I thought the harder one is usually experimental? That just seems counterproductive to include the harder one and decrease the overall scores.
Sometimes the LSAC groups a bunch of easy games together to test. Other times they may group a bunch of hard games together. Nobody knows the reasons for their mysterious ways...
Yea but you could be looking at a 5+point swing depending on which one was real and which one was experimental. That's pretty shady.

User avatar
skers

Platinum
Posts: 5230
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am

Re: Experimental Section

Post by skers » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:44 pm

I had an absolutely brutal experimental games section. Had zones of development and stores aisles. I came in having owned logic games at -1 at most for the last twenty tests. I got so owned on this section i just about walked out until I opened up the fourth section after break and saw more games.

User avatar
northwood

Platinum
Posts: 5036
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by northwood » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:46 pm

TemporarySaint wrote:I had an absolutely brutal experimental games section. Had zones of development and stores aisles. I came in having owned logic games at -1 at most for the last twenty tests. I got so owned on this section i just about walked out until I opened up the fourth section after break and saw more games.

i only had one LG section ( section 5) and that game WAS NOT ON IT!!!! congrats!

dangerousminds

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:55 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by dangerousminds » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:47 pm

Destined wrote:For those of you who didnt have:
RC- UN human rights
LR
LR
LG
LR

Do you remember a question about university students with high social spending and depression?

Will help figure out exactly which section was experimental
I remeber that question

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


henbrag

New
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by henbrag » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:50 pm

can someone be a bit more specific about which LG section was real? i don't remember the subjects aka nurses, artifacts, etc.

one had drivers like F or G have to drive H, K or F have to drive J, one had 4 people attending a race and 1 person not attending

hoping to be experimental: paintings/sculptures 18 19 and 20 c, some game whose last rule said something like "Shaw is the 3rd attendee"

User avatar
northwood

Platinum
Posts: 5036
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by northwood » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:51 pm

yup that one was on the real deal holyfield

whos guessing the curve.. im going for -10/-11

tazmolover

Bronze
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:52 pm

LR section.

Did anyone have a section abuot about Kafka+burning his unpublished works and some question about Epicurus. Also another question about setting a max temperature on a stove...

Can anyone confirm if this section was real or experimental?

pseudonym1

New
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:02 am

Re: Experimental Section

Post by pseudonym1 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:59 pm

So, those who didn't have LG as an experimental do remember a track team with a relationship between U & R? I recall the people in a vehicle/driver game, but unsure if that was the same section.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


bryanpasciak

New
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:58 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by bryanpasciak » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:00 pm

I had RC LG LR LG LR, the first LG was easier. Which one was the experimental?

bartleby

Silver
Posts: 1314
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: Experimental Section

Post by bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:01 pm

Did anyone with only two LR sections have a question about billion year old worm fossils?

User avatar
Sinra

Bronze
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:15 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by Sinra » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:01 pm

bartleby wrote:Did anyone with only two LR sections have a question about billion year old worm fossils?
That was real.

User avatar
Sinra

Bronze
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:15 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by Sinra » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:02 pm

tazmolover wrote:LR section.

Did anyone have a section abuot about Kafka+burning his unpublished works and some question about Epicurus. Also another question about setting a max temperature on a stove...

Can anyone confirm if this section was real or experimental?
Didn't have that. Experimental.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


bartleby

Silver
Posts: 1314
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: Experimental Section

Post by bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:02 pm

F***

User avatar
JoeShmoe11

Bronze
Posts: 355
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:16 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by JoeShmoe11 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:03 pm

bartleby wrote:Did anyone with only two LR sections have a question about billion year old worm fossils?
Yes, I had 2RC and I had that question.

Herbusual

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:44 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by Herbusual » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:03 pm

Anyone know if the game with the people RUSQT was real?

eads

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:39 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by eads » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:04 pm

Herbusual wrote:Anyone know if the game with the people RUSQT was real?
Of course...racer game 4 out of 5

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
mlbennani

New
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:18 am

Re: Experimental Section

Post by mlbennani » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:04 pm

Herbusual wrote:Anyone know if the game with the people RUSQT was real?


Yes it was real. It is the only LG section I got.

tazmolover

Bronze
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:04 pm

Sinra wrote:
tazmolover wrote:LR section.

Did anyone have a section abuot about Kafka+burning his unpublished works and some question about Epicurus. Also another question about setting a max temperature on a stove...

Can anyone confirm if this section was real or experimental?
Didn't have that. Experimental.
Fuck. I felt so confident on a 170+ if that was a real section.

User avatar
northwood

Platinum
Posts: 5036
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by northwood » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:05 pm

real

Destined

New
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:55 pm

Re: Experimental Section

Post by Destined » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:05 pm

eads wrote:So what's your conclusion Destined? I had three LRs....can't remember as well
coffeetable wrote:
Destined wrote:For those of you who didnt have:
RC- UN human rights
LR
LR
LG
LR

Do you remember a question about university students with high social spending and depression?

Will help figure out exactly which section was experimental

YES! My dummy was RC and I remember that question in my LR
eads- conclusion: The first logic reasoning for the order (RC, LR, LR, LG, LR) was the experimental. the one with university students and high spending as well as the one after the break were real.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”