main conclusion question for LR

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.

Posts: 459
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:45 pm

main conclusion question for LR

Postby sangr » Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:01 pm

spoilers. but ive stated it in general terms this is from PT 58 LRsection 1, number 13

ok so ive never gotten a main conclusion question wrong but this one stumped me. not sure why

so the basic structure is in order to A, you must B.
THEN the second sentence says, you can enable B by doing C...and THIS is the main conclusion of the argument.

then the last sentence explains furhter the second sentence.

what im confused about is....i thought the second sentence was supporting the first because its telling you HOW you can do how is it the conclusion?
i can see in regular conversation,, in hindsight, that it could somehow be the conclusion..but still havent grasped it 100%? or maybe not at all -_-

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests