I took PT 38 (October 2002 test) and received the highest score I have thus far, and by a long shot. This also came after taking a much needed day off after countless days of cramming. For the first time in a while, my mind felt at ease and I felt rested enough to do well on the PT. Like I said, I ended up overachieving.
Is there such a big difference in the difficulty in tests from this time period versus those of today? If so, is it in any particular section or all of them?
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:32 am
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am
difficulty? thats kind of relative. I'd say in the 30's RC is different, LR is different, and LG is different compared to todays. Your mileage may vary.
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:56 am
My score dropped like crazy after PT38 - I felt the tone of the test changed somehow - can't explain it but the tests after that felt much harder but then you get used to difficulty of the newer exams. Keep going - PT38 will not a good indicator of your score on the final exam.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], zkyggi and 4 guests