PT 47 #19

Posts: 2508
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm

PT 47 #19

Postby whymeohgodno » Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:55 pm

LR section 2.

The one about cholesterol.

I get why C is right but doesn't it seem like B could be an answer too? The entire conclusion seems to be based upon suspecting that lipoprotein is somehow linked to heart disease so....

User avatar
Posts: 5946
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: PT 47 #19

Postby 2014 » Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:41 pm

I got this one wrong too (picked B) when I took this test about a month ago, so I'm not claiming expertise, but here is how I see it.

B. It provides no evidence for a link between lipoprotein(a) and heart disease.

LINK is fundamentally another word for correlation. When reading that answer it is not saying that there is no evidence of a causal relationship, it is claiming that the argument has no evidence of a correlation.

Now going back to the passage...

"Recently, above average concentrations of the blood particle lipoprotein(a) were found in the blood of many people whose heart disease was not attributable to other causes."

I think what that particular sentence is doing is precisely showing a correlation.

Therefore the claim that there is no evidence of a correlation is false and it isn't a flaw in the argument.


Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kiskeya and 14 guests