In/Out rule question

roballen
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:34 am

In/Out rule question

Postby roballen » Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:55 pm

I just want to make sure I am understanding this right...

let's say the rule says If Z, then not U

so this would mean z<--/-->u ( that if one is in then the other is out or both can be out?)

And then

If a rule said If not Z, then U this could mean that one is in or both are you in?

Do I have this correct?

User avatar
St.Remy
Posts: 526
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:12 pm

Re: In/Out rule question

Postby St.Remy » Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:00 pm

roballen wrote:I just want to make sure I am understanding this right...

let's say the rule says If Z, then not U

so this would mean z<--/-->u ( that if one is in then the other is out or both can be out?)


Correct.

roballen wrote: If a rule said If not Z, then U this could mean that one is in or both are you in?

Do I have this correct?


Given this rule you can have just Z, just U, or both, but you can never have neither present. I believe that is what you said but I'm clarifying just in case.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blackmamba8, galeatus, MSNbot Media and 7 guests