How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?

User avatar
chewdak
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:54 pm

How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?

Postby chewdak » Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:15 am

more or less

Eliyahu7
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:03 am

Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?

Postby Eliyahu7 » Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:42 am

Can you be a little more specific?

User avatar
chewdak
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:54 pm

Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?

Postby chewdak » Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:58 am

Eliyahu7 wrote:Can you be a little more specific?

I would struggle to answer a similar question myself, perhaps someone insightful gave it some thought
for instance,
more emphasis on ... less emphasis on ...
the games are similar to such and such PTs
RC questions are like ...
LR questions are ...

am060459
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:14 am

Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?

Postby am060459 » Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:02 am

not answering your question but hope this is helpful

LG was harder than usual
RC was average
LR was tricky but nonetheless average


i dont know if anyone can answer your question regarding the sections similarity to other PTs.

User avatar
chewdak
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:54 pm

Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?

Postby chewdak » Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:45 am

am060459 wrote:not answering your question but hope this is helpful

LG was harder than usual
RC was average
LR was tricky but nonetheless average


i dont know if anyone can answer your question regarding the sections similarity to other PTs.

It is helpful,
I hope you are right and no one can answer that.
Better use time thinking about other things.

Audio Technica Guy
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:21 pm

Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?

Postby Audio Technica Guy » Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:05 am

I wouldn't even necessarily say ythe games were so much harder as much as I'd say they hit you with basically the same type over and over. If you are a 2D games master, you nailed that games section. If you're more a group games kind of guy, you struggled.

shoop
Posts: 327
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:52 pm

Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?

Postby shoop » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:56 pm

chewdak wrote:more or less


The second LR section was a dirty whore.

GettingReady2010
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:40 pm

Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?

Postby GettingReady2010 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:08 pm

am060459 wrote:not answering your question but hope this is helpful

LG was harder than usual
RC was average
LR was tricky but nonetheless average



i dont know if anyone can answer your question regarding the sections similarity to other PTs.


This is exactly how I would have put it.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alora, CMac86 and 7 guests