Test #12, LR (section 4), Q #11

HyeMart
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:43 pm

Test #12, LR (section 4), Q #11

Postby HyeMart » Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:15 pm

(its in the first 10 official lsats) Anyone want to explain this one to me? I'm not seeing how A can be the answer. Thanks.

HyeMart
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: Test #12, LR (section 4), Q #11

Postby HyeMart » Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:34 am

bizzy bump

hax123
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:47 pm

Re: Test #12, LR (section 4), Q #11

Postby hax123 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:49 am

The stimulus only discusses low-income and high-income households and concludes that household indebtedness could not have caused the recessions. Well what about middle class households? Couldn't their indebtedness have caused the recession? Answer choice A brings up this possibility.

HyeMart
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: Test #12, LR (section 4), Q #11

Postby HyeMart » Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:36 pm

Makes full sense now, Thanks buddy.

harut44
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:51 pm

Re: Test #12, LR (section 4), Q #11

Postby harut44 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:44 pm

True.

The stimulus only shows two of the possible outcomes for household debt recession causing relatedness (lol). Answer choice A in question 11 brings out the possibility that middle class families had enough debt to decrease spending (as discussed in the stimulus). That goes against, rather, doesn't follow the two ends of the spectrum that the stimulus offers.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bearedman8, BOSStongrl, DumbHollywoodActor, poptart123, The_Pluviophile, tuesdayninja, WeightliftingThinker and 17 guests