4th LG... no valid challenge

Saltqjibo
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:47 pm

4th LG... no valid challenge

Postby Saltqjibo » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:49 pm

So the wording is crystal clear guys. I was about to copy the rules out but I realize it may violate LSAC policy. So to summarize
x and y train in diff fields (sim. wording used twice)
X trains as a photographers assis....

x is assigned to place name (sim. wording used again)


*not actual variables

leaving little doubt which groups "trained" and "field" refer to.

Apologies if that is too much info

apropos
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: 4th LG... no valid challenge

Postby apropos » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:53 pm

I posted this in the big thread. I had argued it was ambiguous. It's not. The others were right.
Anyways, I rocked that one. But can't say the same for the super-easy mulch game.

165.. 7 or so below normal. It's looking like a retake here.

Saltqjibo
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:47 pm

Re: 4th LG... no valid challenge

Postby Saltqjibo » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:57 pm

That sucks man. high 160s is still an awesome score though. The mulch one was a bit abstract. I solved it by just using a linear setup and then putting commas between the spaces to indicate when the truck was being cleaned. Just kind of used a bit of black magic rather than the methods I would have normally used.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CHyde, Instrumental, Pozzo, Thomas Hagan, ESQ., tuesdayninja and 10 guests