## Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Bildungsroman

Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

168

FuManChusco

Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

cinefile 17 wrote:
3|ink wrote:I think it's harder to get a 120 than a 180. You probably can't get a 120 with all guesses. You have to identify the correct answer in every question and intentionally select another answer choice. If anything, a 120 should be as celebrated as a 180.

You could just leave them all blank (maybe except for one or two so a score actually gets calculated). Just curious, what's the lowest score that anyone has ever personally (not through the grape vine) known someone to get?

146. I think he took it again and got a 149. He's going TTTT.

cinefile 17

Posts: 257
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:32 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

FuManChusco wrote:
cinefile 17 wrote:
3|ink wrote:I think it's harder to get a 120 than a 180. You probably can't get a 120 with all guesses. You have to identify the correct answer in every question and intentionally select another answer choice. If anything, a 120 should be as celebrated as a 180.

You could just leave them all blank (maybe except for one or two so a score actually gets calculated). Just curious, what's the lowest score that anyone has ever personally (not through the grape vine) known someone to get?

146. I think he took it again and got a 149. He's going TTTT.

Someone in my TM class was there b.c. she got a 136 on the real LSAT she took without prepping.

Sandro

Posts: 2526
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

Someone I know got low 150's and then score in the 140s on the retake lol

notreallyalawyer

Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:00 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

Hey-O

Posts: 718
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

3|ink wrote:I think it's harder to get a 120 than a 180. You probably can't get a 120 with all guesses. You have to identify the correct answer in every question and intentionally select another answer choice. If anything, a 120 should be as celebrated as a 180.

No true, it is fairly easy to choose an incorrect answer, because there are four of them and only one right answer. Randomly guessing would probably not get a 120 but intentionally bombing the test could.

WestOfTheRest

Posts: 1397
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

LG (-0 to -1) - I was rushed in the final game, but I know I got the two questions I was worried about right. The other questions were a blur.
LR (-0 to -2 per section) - Complete blur, I'll have to wait and see. These are the sections I'm most worried about because I can't remember them at all.
RC (-0 to -2) - I thought this was a fairly easy RC, all things considered.

So I'm hoping for -0 LG and -0 RC. If I pull that off I feel confident.

I'm aiming for a 175+, but I would be relieved with a 171 or higher, as I already have a 171 and anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure.

kk19131

Posts: 1054
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 7:08 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

150

notreallyalawyer

Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:00 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

sorry about the rant ^. don't know where that came from

Scallywaggums

Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:52 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

ca\$hmoney69 wrote:i would shit my pants in public in exchange for any of you guy's low score predictions....

What if it were filmed on the senate floor and broadcast nationally, resulting in criminal charges, destroying any hopes of law school, let alone a solid law career?
Just sayin'. Chin up, Emo Obama.

jdstl

Posts: 216
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:48 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

CastleRock wrote:LG (-0 to -1) - I was rushed in the final game, but I know I got the two questions I was worried about right. The other questions were a blur.
LR (-0 to -2 per section) - Complete blur, I'll have to wait and see. These are the sections I'm most worried about because I can't remember them at all.
RC (-0 to -2) - I thought this was a fairly easy RC, all things considered.

So I'm hoping for -0 LG and -0 RC. If I pull that off I feel confident.

I'm aiming for a 175+, but I would be relieved with a 171 or higher, as I already have a 171 and anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure.

I feel you in terms of LR uncertainty. Even on prep tests I could never tell how well/poorly I had done on a given LR section. Not to mention they are, as you say, a complete blur.

WestOfTheRest

Posts: 1397
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

jdstl wrote:
CastleRock wrote:LG (-0 to -1) - I was rushed in the final game, but I know I got the two questions I was worried about right. The other questions were a blur.
LR (-0 to -2 per section) - Complete blur, I'll have to wait and see. These are the sections I'm most worried about because I can't remember them at all.
RC (-0 to -2) - I thought this was a fairly easy RC, all things considered.

So I'm hoping for -0 LG and -0 RC. If I pull that off I feel confident.

I'm aiming for a 175+, but I would be relieved with a 171 or higher, as I already have a 171 and anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure.

I feel you in terms of LR uncertainty. Even on prep tests I could never tell how well/poorly I had done on a given LR section. Not to mention they are, as you say, a complete blur.

I completely misjudged my timing on my first section (LG) and ended up guess on the last three in that section. It could have ended up killing me on the next section which was an LR. And now, thinking back, in the second LR section I skipped one question and I'm not sure if I went back. Although I do remember going back to a question in that section. That first section killed my confidence, thank god it was experimental. The RC was easy though, and I usually have no idea how I feel about RC.

notreallyalawyer

Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:00 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

CastleRock wrote:LG (-0 to -1) - I was rushed in the final game, but I know I got the two questions I was worried about right. The other questions were a blur.
LR (-0 to -2 per section) - Complete blur, I'll have to wait and see. These are the sections I'm most worried about because I can't remember them at all.
RC (-0 to -2) - I thought this was a fairly easy RC, all things considered.

So I'm hoping for -0 LG and -0 RC. If I pull that off I feel confident.

I'm aiming for a 175+, but I would be relieved with a 171 or higher, as I already have a 171 and anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure.

two things: why retake with a 171? that's what about -8/-9? where would you expect to improve? i would guess that your chances of getting a lower score are higher than your chances of a higher score. secondly, the part that reads "anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure" screams nervous breakdown at age 30. good luck with that.

WestOfTheRest

Posts: 1397
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

notreallyalawyer wrote:
CastleRock wrote:LG (-0 to -1) - I was rushed in the final game, but I know I got the two questions I was worried about right. The other questions were a blur.
LR (-0 to -2 per section) - Complete blur, I'll have to wait and see. These are the sections I'm most worried about because I can't remember them at all.
RC (-0 to -2) - I thought this was a fairly easy RC, all things considered.

So I'm hoping for -0 LG and -0 RC. If I pull that off I feel confident.

I'm aiming for a 175+, but I would be relieved with a 171 or higher, as I already have a 171 and anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure.

two things: why retake with a 171? that's what about -8/-9? where would you expect to improve? i would guess that your chances of getting a lower score are higher than your chances of a higher score. secondly, the part that reads "anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure" screams nervous breakdown at age 30. good luck with that.

my 171 was a -7. The curve on my test was a -8 for a 170. That's reason number one, with a better curve I will score higher. Secondly, I was consistently scoring 176-180 on my pts before I took. Thirdly, the difference between a 171 and a 172 is substantial. A 172 is basically the "you have a chance" line at the top four schools, anything below that line really has no chance. Finally, if I have a nervous breakdown, I guess I will have to deal with that when the time comes.

Mike19

Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:05 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

120. Unless I got really lucky on a few guesses. Then maybe a 123.

notreallyalawyer

Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:00 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

CastleRock wrote:
notreallyalawyer wrote:
CastleRock wrote:LG (-0 to -1) - I was rushed in the final game, but I know I got the two questions I was worried about right. The other questions were a blur.
LR (-0 to -2 per section) - Complete blur, I'll have to wait and see. These are the sections I'm most worried about because I can't remember them at all.
RC (-0 to -2) - I thought this was a fairly easy RC, all things considered.

So I'm hoping for -0 LG and -0 RC. If I pull that off I feel confident.

I'm aiming for a 175+, but I would be relieved with a 171 or higher, as I already have a 171 and anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure.

two things: why retake with a 171? that's what about -8/-9? where would you expect to improve? i would guess that your chances of getting a lower score are higher than your chances of a higher score. secondly, the part that reads "anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure" screams nervous breakdown at age 30. good luck with that.

my 171 was a -7. The curve on my test was a -8 for a 170. That's reason number one, with a better curve I will score higher. Secondly, I was consistently scoring 176-180 on my pts before I took. Thirdly, the difference between a 171 and a 172 is substantial. A 172 is basically the "you have a chance" line at the top four schools, anything below that line really has no chance. Finally, if I have a nervous breakdown, I guess I will have to deal with that when the time comes.

fair enough, fairly sound reasoning. what about your softs? anything out of the ordinary that could potentially allow the powers that be to consider your 171?

WestOfTheRest

Posts: 1397
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

notreallyalawyer wrote:
CastleRock wrote:
notreallyalawyer wrote:
CastleRock wrote:LG (-0 to -1) - I was rushed in the final game, but I know I got the two questions I was worried about right. The other questions were a blur.
LR (-0 to -2 per section) - Complete blur, I'll have to wait and see. These are the sections I'm most worried about because I can't remember them at all.
RC (-0 to -2) - I thought this was a fairly easy RC, all things considered.

So I'm hoping for -0 LG and -0 RC. If I pull that off I feel confident.

I'm aiming for a 175+, but I would be relieved with a 171 or higher, as I already have a 171 and anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure.

two things: why retake with a 171? that's what about -8/-9? where would you expect to improve? i would guess that your chances of getting a lower score are higher than your chances of a higher score. secondly, the part that reads "anything lower than that would be a complete and utter failure" screams nervous breakdown at age 30. good luck with that.

my 171 was a -7. The curve on my test was a -8 for a 170. That's reason number one, with a better curve I will score higher. Secondly, I was consistently scoring 176-180 on my pts before I took. Thirdly, the difference between a 171 and a 172 is substantial. A 172 is basically the "you have a chance" line at the top four schools, anything below that line really has no chance. Finally, if I have a nervous breakdown, I guess I will have to deal with that when the time comes.

fair enough, fairly sound reasoning. what about your softs? anything out of the ordinary that could potentially allow the powers that be to consider your 171?

Nope, nothing excessively amazing. I was raised in a single parent home, first person in my family to go to university (mother doesn't even have grade 12). My mother and myself have been fostering children fro the last 11 years, which has taken up alot of my free time.

am060459

Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:14 am

### Re: Predict Your June 2010 LSAT score...

LG -3 (games was hard and had to guess on 1 or 2 questions)
RC -7 (third passage screwed me up)
LR -13 (i feel like there were a lot of trick answers and i got caught by them)

77 --> 161