Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby FuManChusco » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:08 pm

d34dluk3 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:THREAD JACK.

It needed it.

And I agree, rocketman, you are a lot like Fox News.


Haha, probably. Now I'm bored. I can only hope that fox news comment starts an argument.

User avatar
Dany
Posts: 11580
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Dany » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:09 pm

But... but... look at all the pretty emoticons!

fuck.

mcleod.an
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:56 am

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby mcleod.an » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:09 pm

380yarddrives wrote:Mallard hit the nail on the head. If someone asks (in regards to occupation), "What ___ are you in?" there is only one way to answer. "Radiology" would be a good example for a proper response.

If you state the physical location of your place of employment you have not answered the question, "New Jersey" is not a proper response, even by the alternative definition provided on the first page of this post. Some say this is a stretch...it's not a reasonable stretch, it's irrational.



But if you could be studying one of three different regions you could be studying/apprenticing in one of two different occupations and someone asks you what field you are in you could respond "occupation 1 or 2" or "region 1, 2 or 3".

I think the ambiguity has less to do with the fact that a certain occupation was involved as much as it has to do with the fact that we were talking about studying an occupation and a region
Last edited by mcleod.an on Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Dany
Posts: 11580
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Dany » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:10 pm

mcleod.an wrote:
380yarddrives wrote:Mallard hit the nail on the head. If someone asks (in regards to occupation), "What ___ are you in?" there is only one way to answer. "Radiology" would be a good example for a proper response.

If you state the physical location of your place of employment you have not answered the question, "New Jersey" is not a proper response, even by the alternative definition provided on the first page of this post. Some say this is a stretch...it's not a reasonable stretch, it's irrational.



But if you have three different regions to study and you have two different occupations to study/apprentice in and someone asks you what field you are in you could respond "occupation 1 or 2" or "region 1, 2 or 3".

:evil:

User avatar
bk1
Posts: 18421
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby bk1 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:10 pm

mcleod.an wrote:But if you have three different regions to study and you have two different occupations to study/apprentice in and someone asks you what field you are in you could respond "occupation 1 or 2" or "region 1, 2 or 3".


LOOK WHAT YOU DID, ESKIMO!

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby FuManChusco » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:10 pm

Oh God. They're back. Why Eskimo, why?

User avatar
Rocketman11
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:32 am

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Rocketman11 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:11 pm

d34dluk3 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:THREAD JACK.

It needed it.

And I agree, rocketman, you are a lot like Fox News.



--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
Dany
Posts: 11580
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Dany » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:12 pm

Rocket only came here because I was trolling in the first place!

But sorry I messed it all up:

--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby FuManChusco » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:14 pm

I'm glad that ended. I was getting sick of being a huge dick to everyone who didn't agree with me. Gotta give me some credit for a near 20 page bullshit argument though.

User avatar
Rocketman11
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:32 am

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Rocketman11 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:14 pm

eskimo wrote:Rocket only came here because I was trolling in the first place!

But sorry I messed it all up:

--ImageRemoved--


this would make an excellent mitten

User avatar
bk1
Posts: 18421
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby bk1 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:14 pm

Peace offering accepted.

Is it me or does that puppy look like he's got really sharp claws?

User avatar
Dany
Posts: 11580
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Dany » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:15 pm

Rocketman11 wrote:
this would make an excellent mitten

:shock:

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby d34d9823 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:16 pm

I forgive you because of the cuteness of your peace offering. :D

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby FuManChusco » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:16 pm

He's needs the claws. Ban-puppy in training.

User avatar
Rocketman11
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:32 am

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Rocketman11 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:16 pm

eskimo wrote:
Rocketman11 wrote:
this would make an excellent mitten

:shock:


700 posts and you think you're important enough to hide your online status?

User avatar
Dany
Posts: 11580
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Dany » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:17 pm

Rocketman11 wrote:
eskimo wrote:
Rocketman11 wrote:
this would make an excellent mitten

:shock:


700 posts and you think you're important enough to hide your online status?

Is it weird to hide it? I just saw that it was an option the other day and thought it was sneaky and cool.

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby d34d9823 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:18 pm

eskimo wrote:
Rocketman11 wrote:
eskimo wrote:
Rocketman11 wrote:
this would make an excellent mitten

:shock:


700 posts and you think you're important enough to hide your online status?

Is it weird to hide it? I just saw that it was an option the other day and thought it was sneaky and cool.

Rocketman is a creeper. It irritates him.

User avatar
Dany
Posts: 11580
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Dany » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:19 pm

I thought I was all like:

--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
Rocketman11
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:32 am

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Rocketman11 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:21 pm

eskimo wrote:
Rocketman11 wrote:
eskimo wrote:
Rocketman11 wrote:
this would make an excellent mitten

:shock:


700 posts and you think you're important enough to hide your online status?

Is it weird to hide it? I just saw that it was an option the other day and thought it was sneaky and cool.


i never saw the point. i see it as a way for divas to say "i dont want anyone bothering me when im on here" but 1) we're going to know if you post, and 2) no one PMs ya'll anyway

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby FuManChusco » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:48 pm

It's about that time.

/thread

Hey-O
Posts: 719
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Hey-O » Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:00 pm

Does anyone definitely remember if the word in question was preceded by the word 'trained' or 'assigned'?

This makes a big difference. I remember it being that assigned, but someone else said trained. If it was trained that makes it much less ambiguous.

User avatar
citrustang
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby citrustang » Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:01 pm

Thank you all for your participation. No matter how much it wanders off-topic, the thread is still fulfilling its intended function to help people identify a situation they may have experienced on the test, to inform them of the proper course of action in contacting the LSAC, and to encourage them to do so in a timely manner.

User avatar
zworykin
Posts: 449
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:18 am

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby zworykin » Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:07 pm

Hey-O wrote:Does anyone definitely remember if the word in question was preceded by the word 'trained' or 'assigned'?

This makes a big difference. I remember it being that assigned, but someone else said trained. If it was trained that makes it much less ambiguous.


I'm not gonna quote the test, but I'll respond to you by saying that it wasn't ambiguous. :lol:

Hey-O
Posts: 719
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby Hey-O » Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:12 pm

zworykin wrote:
Hey-O wrote:Does anyone definitely remember if the word in question was preceded by the word 'trained' or 'assigned'?

This makes a big difference. I remember it being that assigned, but someone else said trained. If it was trained that makes it much less ambiguous.


I'm not gonna quote the test, but I'll respond to you by saying that it wasn't ambiguous. :lol:


Your answer is ambiguous. :D Could you pm me? I think I take your meaning but I'm not certain. Also, how certain are you?

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Official challenge to the 4th game in the scored LG section

Postby d34d9823 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:58 pm

Hey-O wrote:
zworykin wrote:
Hey-O wrote:Does anyone definitely remember if the word in question was preceded by the word 'trained' or 'assigned'?

This makes a big difference. I remember it being that assigned, but someone else said trained. If it was trained that makes it much less ambiguous.


I'm not gonna quote the test, but I'll respond to you by saying that it wasn't ambiguous. :lol:


Your answer is ambiguous. :D Could you pm me? I think I take your meaning but I'm not certain. Also, how certain are you?

Bad Hey-O! Bad zworykin! This thread is now about rocketman and eskimo.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BOSStongrl, cianchetta0, MSNbot Media, njames1961, Pozzo, wildquest8200, Yahoo [Bot] and 9 guests