.

User avatar
Dany
Posts: 11580
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

.

Postby Dany » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:28 am

.
Last edited by Dany on Wed Jun 05, 2013 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

WestOfTheRest
Posts: 1412
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby WestOfTheRest » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:29 am

exactly the same

User avatar
suspicious android
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby suspicious android » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:31 am

I took the test last June, I think there was more freak out about the dinosaurs game. But I also think there were just more posts, maybe they're a little more stringent about deleting things now.

dakatz
Posts: 2460
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby dakatz » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:32 am

Yes, people always worry afterward. It seems like the natural thing for a majority of testtakers. And even if this test was particularly hard, the curve would be accordingly adjusted to reflect the difficulty. Thus, whether it was hard or easy should be pretty much irrelevant.

byunbee
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:12 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby byunbee » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:33 am

no, this is an extremely important and stressful test, i think most people outside of the top >1% leave that room feeling pretty unsure of how they did.

User avatar
PhantaManta
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:45 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby PhantaManta » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:34 am

Same every test, every year. And every year there are new people who don't know about the economy being bad, and new people trying to berate them. The cycle continues.

idoubtit
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:22 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby idoubtit » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:38 am

I took the June one last year , sucked on the games, and everyone here was whining about the dinosaur game, so I thought I might be fine since I am not alone. then I got a shabby 163.

this year is exactly the same. sucked on the intern again. So now seeing people complaining about the the same game doesn't make me feel that I can get something higher than 165 though my recent 15 practice scores were all above 170.

User avatar
LSAT Blog
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby LSAT Blog » Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:05 am

To the OP:

Your analysis is correct (one could write an LSAT Q about it).

The people posting and freaking out are a self-selected group, and it's a perfectly natural reaction - happens every LSAT.

User avatar
Angelica Pickles
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:14 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby Angelica Pickles » Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:09 am

I think this is probably typical.

User avatar
Moxie
Posts: 665
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:27 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby Moxie » Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:27 am

dakatz wrote:Yes, people always worry afterward. It seems like the natural thing for a majority of testtakers.

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby d34d9823 » Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:44 am

byunbee wrote:no, this is an extremely important and stressful test, i think most people outside of the top >1% leave that room feeling pretty unsure of how they did.

Hell, I'm a lock for top 1% and I'm super stressed and nervous about how I did.

User avatar
romothesavior
Posts: 14772
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby romothesavior » Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:46 am

d34dluk3 wrote:
byunbee wrote:no, this is an extremely important and stressful test, i think most people outside of the top >1% leave that room feeling pretty unsure of how they did.

Hell, I'm a lock for top 1% and I'm super stressed and nervous about how I did.


There are ways of communicating what you are saying without coming off in such an arrogant, back-patting sort of way.

And yes OP, it is the same every year.

User avatar
KMaine
Posts: 862
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:57 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby KMaine » Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:51 am

^^^ THIS and this.

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby d34d9823 » Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:51 am

romothesavior wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:
byunbee wrote:no, this is an extremely important and stressful test, i think most people outside of the top >1% leave that room feeling pretty unsure of how they did.

Hell, I'm a lock for top 1% and I'm super stressed and nervous about how I did.


There are ways of communicating what you are saying without coming off in such an arrogant, back-patting sort of way.

And yes OP, it is the same every year.

Whatever, man. Read what I'm replying to; I didn't just throw it out randomly.

User avatar
romothesavior
Posts: 14772
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby romothesavior » Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:54 am

d34dluk3 wrote:
romothesavior wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:
byunbee wrote:no, this is an extremely important and stressful test, i think most people outside of the top >1% leave that room feeling pretty unsure of how they did.

Hell, I'm a lock for top 1% and I'm super stressed and nervous about how I did.


There are ways of communicating what you are saying without coming off in such an arrogant, back-patting sort of way.

And yes OP, it is the same every year.

Whatever, man. Read what I'm replying to; I didn't just throw it out randomly.


Despite getting a paltry 168, I can read man. I saw what you're referring to. I just think you could use a little more tact and not call yourself a lock 99th percentile. A little humility goes a long way, especially with all the people freaking out in here.

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby d34d9823 » Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:31 am

romothesavior wrote:Despite getting a paltry 168, I can read man. I saw what you're referring to. I just think you could use a little more tact and not call yourself a lock 99th percentile. A little humility goes a long way, especially with all the people freaking out in here.

Like me? 6 points means just as much to me as it does to everybody else.

User avatar
balzern
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby balzern » Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:37 am

d34dluk3 wrote:
romothesavior wrote:Despite getting a paltry 168, I can read man. I saw what you're referring to. I just think you could use a little more tact and not call yourself a lock 99th percentile. A little humility goes a long way, especially with all the people freaking out in here.

Like me? 6 points means just as much to me as it does to everybody else.


How is even getting into a law school comparable to your decision to go to Georgetown or UVA?

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: To those who've been here before...

Postby d34d9823 » Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:45 am

balzern wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:
romothesavior wrote:Despite getting a paltry 168, I can read man. I saw what you're referring to. I just think you could use a little more tact and not call yourself a lock 99th percentile. A little humility goes a long way, especially with all the people freaking out in here.

Like me? 6 points means just as much to me as it does to everybody else.


How is even getting into a law school comparable to your decision to go to Georgetown or UVA?

Eh, we can split hairs, but the point was that I'm freaking out just like everyone else.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, cherrygalore and 6 guests