- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:22 pm
Don't know ... the last Pt (59) I took before the test I thought I bombed, taking about sub-160 bomb, and I ended up getting a 165, so we'll see .. I'm actually hoping that the last game loosens up the curve as it would benefit me ... I handled the 4th game pretty well so I was surprised to see as much convo as I did when I came back to the forum ... however, the 3rd game raped me ... I didn't think it was hard I just thought I didn't handled it well ... had this been all I would have been completely confident in 165+ but the RC was the first one I had not finished in a long time ... luckily I heard some people had the same experience both at my test site and on this forum but I'm not counting on the LSAC seeing this as a particularly difficult section scale wise... I don't know ... coming out of the test I thought it was pretty standard (I was thinking -10 at best with a -9 a real possibility) ... LR was hella easy (I think easier than PT 55) and I had 3 LR's so I would have expected at least one to wear me down ... LG was standard I just couldn't capitalize on the third game under timed conditions and you already know how I feel about RC ... I would guess a 162-164 band range(depending on the scale) with an optimistic 1 to 2 point bump ... good luck to everyone ... I hope your hard work paid off
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:21 pm
Mid to high 160s. I had two LG sections one of which I destroyed but it turned out that one was the experimental. I felt fairly confident throughout except on the first RC passage.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest