Top Law Schools

im talking like 4 in a row twice? any input?

This isn't that unusual. LSAC likes to throw this in to screw with people's heads it seems.

Yes!!!!!

However, I had 3 LR.

One of them was brutally hard (I gauge how hard it is by how much difficulty I have with the first 18 questions).

Did anyone else who got 3 LR experience the same thing?

My test was lr, lg, lr2, rc, lr3.

Lr and lr3 were very manageable. Lr2 kicked me in the mouth.

any high scorers get this similar pattern? a TON of C's in the the second LR (real of course only had 2 LRs)

ex. CCCC* * * CCC**CCC

Random is random.

Actually, 4 in a row is pretty damn rare.

http://lsatblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/sa ... -lsat.html

I'm pretty sure I had a block of 5 in a row on the easier RC.

I had a block of three Cs.

I had a straight row of four C's, but for me it was the third LR section. It freaked me out, but I ran out of time before I could go back and double check. But I'm glad others experienced it too.

It's weird, my scantron looked like this:

B
A
N
N
A
B
L
E

i had a block of 5 c's in a row. I had LR, LR2, LG, RC and LR3... there was an especially hard one on there.. i hope it was the experimental because i absolutely killed t he other two :\

The makers *love* for us to be concerned with such 'trends' rather than what the best answer is. It's hard not to say "Damn, three in a row?"-- but, you can't make any assumptions about those who test us for that very skill (which really demonstrates restraint)--NOT to make unwarranted assumptions.

I noticed it too, argued with myself, realized how much time I was wasting worrying, and trusted my first instinct. The WORST thing on the LSAT is to talk oneself out of the correct answer for reasons other than that for which the question warrants.

jpSartre wrote:It's weird, my scantron looked like this:

B
A
N
N
A
B
L
E

There's no N on the scantron. Idiot.

hellojd wrote:

jpSartre wrote:It's weird, my scantron looked like this:

B
A
N
N
A
B
L
E

There's no N on the scantron. Idiot.

lol epic. I was waiting for someone to call this guy out.

kkklick wrote:

hellojd wrote:

jpSartre wrote:It's weird, my scantron looked like this:

B
A
N
N
A
B
L
E

There's no N on the scantron. Idiot.

lol epic. I was waiting for someone to call this guy out.

Is there an 'L' either?

Regardless, the point was well taken.

This is the best post ever. I noticed this on my test and totally freaked out! I kept checking to see if any of my answers were wrong, but I liked them all. The good news is that I feel better about my test. The bad news is I didn't properly check my answers because I was worried about this four in a row garbage.

yessssssir. and D's i believe. glad this was here. I felt it was mostly C and D and had me a little freaked. that was my second LR which i found much easier than the first.

haha so funny a lot of people experienced this. Hopefully theres a ton of Cs in real LR 2

hellojd wrote:

jpSartre wrote:It's weird, my scantron looked like this:

B
A
N
N
A
B
L
E

There's no N on the scantron. Idiot.

lol

Tautology wrote:Random is random.

Your username makes this post infinitely better.

no kidding! i had 24 on my last LR....i guess they decided on one rogue A. really i agree though. lots of D's and C's, i think in both LR2 and RC, and few A's and B's.

The one with lots of Cs and Ds is not experimental, cuz I only had two LR and I had it.

Veidt wrote:no kidding! i had 24 on my last LR....i guess they decided on one rogue A. really i agree though. lots of D's and C's, i think in both LR2 and RC, and few A's and B's.

I agree about RC to, I was looking at my sheet and at some points I had 3 C's in a row, 3 D's and 3 E's, I'm not saying they were all right, but I felt pretty confident, so it is possible. Weirdest test in terms of bubbling patterns and LG in my opinion.