June 2010 CURVE Predictions

User avatar
James Bond
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby James Bond » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:00 pm

A'nold wrote:-7.


Go play in traffic :P

User avatar
Dany
Posts: 11580
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby Dany » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:01 pm

A'nold wrote:-7.

:shock:

User avatar
thesealocust
Posts: 8448
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby thesealocust » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:06 pm

never mind
Last edited by thesealocust on Sun Jun 27, 2010 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
oxford_don
Posts: 237
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:06 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby oxford_don » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:10 pm

[]
Last edited by oxford_don on Sun May 11, 2014 11:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
hellojd
Posts: 411
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:29 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby hellojd » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:11 pm

soooo... imho i thought rc/lr was manageable.. but thought lg was difficult.

heres to hopin for -12+

budafied
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:04 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby budafied » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:16 pm

I would LOVE a -12 or so.

Shrimps
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby Shrimps » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:46 pm

-12 would've been perfect, but RC was easy, LR was average, and the games apparently only slightly harder than average. I'm hoping for a -11, afraid of -10.

User avatar
2014
Posts: 5832
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby 2014 » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:54 pm

To whoever looked up the trend for June tests since 02, what is the trend usually for the Sept/Oct test? Is the curve on it usually more or less favorable than June?

AbraCadabra91
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:52 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby AbraCadabra91 » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:58 pm

.

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby Knock » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:19 pm

guessing -12

jarofsoup
Posts: 1952
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:41 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby jarofsoup » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:23 pm

Knockglock wrote:guessing -12





I think it will be the exact same as Dec.

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby 3|ink » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:25 pm

jarofsoup wrote:
Knockglock wrote:guessing -12





I think it will be the exact same as Dec.


December was unprecedented.

jarofsoup
Posts: 1952
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:41 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby jarofsoup » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:26 pm

3|ink wrote:
jarofsoup wrote:
Knockglock wrote:guessing -12





I think it will be the exact same as Dec.


December was unprecedented.




A lot of people were completely flustered by the games. People outside my test center were crying.

SHANbangs
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:36 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby SHANbangs » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:26 pm

what was december's?

User avatar
hellojd
Posts: 411
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:29 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby hellojd » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:29 pm

jarofsoup wrote:
3|ink wrote:
jarofsoup wrote:
Knockglock wrote:guessing -12


I think it will be the exact same as Dec.


December was unprecedented.




A lot of people were completely flustered by the games. People outside my test center were crying.


I don't get it... I can literally do any LG section from PT 40-59 in 35 minutes easy... and yet I struggled on these LG. WHY?! I knew the only thing that would throw me off on this test could be LG, and lo and behold, thank you LSAC.

Unfortunately, I don't think the LR and RC was too difficult, so the curve won't even be that great...

User avatar
iamcutdacheck
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 5:23 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby iamcutdacheck » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:37 pm

3|ink wrote:
jarofsoup wrote:
Knockglock wrote:guessing -12





I think it will be the exact same as Dec.


December was unprecedented.


Welcome to standardized testing during a recession! There were ALOT of people taking the LSAT at USC, whatever you want to infer about that please do so but I agree with the -11 or -12 curve.

JasonR
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:09 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby JasonR » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:03 am

iamcutdacheck wrote:
3|ink wrote:
jarofsoup wrote:
Knockglock wrote:guessing -12





I think it will be the exact same as Dec.


December was unprecedented.


Welcome to standardized testing during a recession! There were ALOT of people taking the LSAT at USC, whatever you want to infer about that please do so but I agree with the -11 or -12 curve.


Wrong. The recession has nothing to do with the scoring scale. The test is not curved.

Jkf esq
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:19 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby Jkf esq » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:15 am

lebob wrote:LR and RC were, relatively speaking, ordinary
the games were a bit funky

though i'd like to say that it was a massively difficult test...it probably wasn't, and unfortunately, i think we're looking at another -10


sigh. sigh. sigh.



I agree aside from the mulch game it wasn't anything too funky. The last game got difficult because of the time you spent trying to figure out the mulch

mkr5u
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby mkr5u » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:22 am

I hate mulch...

User avatar
jpSartre
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:05 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby jpSartre » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:25 am

I can't see more than -10 on a 100 question test.

Fark-o-vision
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:41 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby Fark-o-vision » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:26 am

I don't know. The "Real" LG completely murdered me. It didn't seem that hard, but it was an absolute kick to the nads after doing the experimental LG. If LSAC had any heart they would have put the real one first and the experimental after. I blew past that experimental thinking I was easily in for a 175+ only to be absolutely blindsided by the much, much more difficult real section.

Not only was it harder, but it kind of broke my spirit.

Jkf esq
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:19 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby Jkf esq » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:31 am

I think where the LG was hard the other sections made up for it so I think the curve will be 10

jjlaw
Posts: 299
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:43 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby jjlaw » Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:27 am

I didn't think this test was as hard as PT59. Though the LG was a curveball (still not sure how I did really), I thought the LR and RC were average. Maybe the second LR was a bit harder.

I'm going to say -11 to be generous, but most likely -10.

User avatar
risktaker
Posts: 687
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:10 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby risktaker » Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:33 am

-12 (Please baby Jesus, if you love me)

User avatar
Albatross
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:30 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby Albatross » Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:43 am

-11 at the very least. LG was ridiculously hard. Ive never seen a game like the last one.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media and 5 guests