June 2010 CURVE Predictions

User avatar
stintez
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:55 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby stintez » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:08 am

-12

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby 3|ink » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:09 am

-13

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby d34d9823 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:10 am

-14

User avatar
alicrimson
Posts: 923
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:27 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby alicrimson » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:17 am

-15

User avatar
cinefile 17
Posts: 257
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:32 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby cinefile 17 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:21 am

-10 or -11 sadly :(

Edit: Sorry d34. Definitely a -16 for sure. Hardest damn lsat ever.
Last edited by cinefile 17 on Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:37 am, edited 2 times in total.

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby d34d9823 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:26 am

cinefile 17 wrote:-10 or -11 sadly :(

Aww you ruined it

User avatar
balzern
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby balzern » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:06 pm

keep it going! -17

User avatar
MarkRenton
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:54 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby MarkRenton » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:13 pm

cinefile 17 wrote:-10 or -11 sadly :(

Edit: Sorry d34. Definitely a -16 for sure. Hardest damn lsat ever.


To be honest, I see it being more likely to be a -9 than a -11 because there was only one really difficult section (LG's). -10 is probably credited

1991
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:29 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby 1991 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:44 pm

MarkRenton wrote:
cinefile 17 wrote:-10 or -11 sadly :(

Edit: Sorry d34. Definitely a -16 for sure. Hardest damn lsat ever.


To be honest, I see it being more likely to be a -9 than a -11 because there was only one really difficult section (LG's). -10 is probably credited


Oh God, if it's -9 I might just jump off a building.

TOMaHULK
Posts: 547
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:40 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby TOMaHULK » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:47 pm

It's going to be a -10 minimum.

You people saying -9 are just haters. Definetely harder than the few -9 test given previously. And you know damned well it was... :oops:

Sorry...sorry... :D

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby 3|ink » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:01 pm

TOMaHULK wrote:It's going to be a -10 minimum.

You people saying -9 are just haters. Definetely harder than the few -9 test given previously. And you know damned well it was... :oops:

Sorry...sorry... :D


Agreed. A hard game is different from a hard RC passage. In a hard RC passage, you could still get reasonably get 60-70% of the questions correct without wasting too much time. That's -3 or -4. However, a hard game is more likely to mean that you have to guess for all of the questions on that game. This game had one BIG deduction. The game was really impossible without that deduction. However, at the same time, if you made that deduction the game was easy.

-10 worst case scenario. RC and LR were reasonable, but not easy. -9 = easy. -10+ = reasonable/hard.

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby FuManChusco » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:16 pm

3|ink wrote:
TOMaHULK wrote:It's going to be a -10 minimum.

You people saying -9 are just haters. Definetely harder than the few -9 test given previously. And you know damned well it was... :oops:

Sorry...sorry... :D


Agreed. A hard game is different from a hard RC passage. In a hard RC passage, you could still get reasonably get 60-70% of the questions correct without wasting too much time. That's -3 or -4. However, a hard game is more likely to mean that you have to guess for all of the questions on that game. This game had one BIG deduction. The game was really impossible without that deduction. However, at the same time, if you made that deduction the game was easy.

-10 worst case scenario. RC and LR were reasonable, but not easy. -9 = easy. -10+ = reasonable/hard.


PT57 - hard LG -11

PT59 - hard RC -14

Just saying.

am060459
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:14 am

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby am060459 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:17 pm

FuManChusco wrote:
3|ink wrote:
TOMaHULK wrote:It's going to be a -10 minimum.

You people saying -9 are just haters. Definetely harder than the few -9 test given previously. And you know damned well it was... :oops:

Sorry...sorry... :D


Agreed. A hard game is different from a hard RC passage. In a hard RC passage, you could still get reasonably get 60-70% of the questions correct without wasting too much time. That's -3 or -4. However, a hard game is more likely to mean that you have to guess for all of the questions on that game. This game had one BIG deduction. The game was really impossible without that deduction. However, at the same time, if you made that deduction the game was easy.

-10 worst case scenario. RC and LR were reasonable, but not easy. -9 = easy. -10+ = reasonable/hard.


PT57 - hard LG -11

PT59 - hard RC -14

Just saying.


im feeling that -11.

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby 3|ink » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:22 pm

FuManChusco wrote:
3|ink wrote:
TOMaHULK wrote:It's going to be a -10 minimum.

You people saying -9 are just haters. Definetely harder than the few -9 test given previously. And you know damned well it was... :oops:

Sorry...sorry... :D


Agreed. A hard game is different from a hard RC passage. In a hard RC passage, you could still get reasonably get 60-70% of the questions correct without wasting too much time. That's -3 or -4. However, a hard game is more likely to mean that you have to guess for all of the questions on that game. This game had one BIG deduction. The game was really impossible without that deduction. However, at the same time, if you made that deduction the game was easy.

-10 worst case scenario. RC and LR were reasonable, but not easy. -9 = easy. -10+ = reasonable/hard.


PT57 - hard LG -11

PT59 - hard RC -14

Just saying.


Was PT 57 the dinos? That was not hard. Then again, difficulty is relative. I thought the interns game was hard.

PT59 - Many people have trouble with in and out games like the third on 59 (assuming that's december). LR was no walk in the park either. That was an all around hard test.

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby d34d9823 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:25 pm

3|ink wrote:Was PT 57 the dinos? That was not hard. Then again, difficulty is relative. I thought the interns game was hard.

PT59 - Many people have trouble with in and out games like the third on 59 (assuming that's december). LR was no walk in the park either. That was an all around hard test.

Lol we have different takes on the LSAT for sure.

I thought dinos was harder than interns (fucked up dinos on the PT and got interns on the real test). On 59, I went -0 on everything else and -3 on RC on my PT.

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby 3|ink » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:36 pm

d34dluk3 wrote:
3|ink wrote:Was PT 57 the dinos? That was not hard. Then again, difficulty is relative. I thought the interns game was hard.

PT59 - Many people have trouble with in and out games like the third on 59 (assuming that's december). LR was no walk in the park either. That was an all around hard test.

Lol we have different takes on the LSAT for sure.

I thought dinos was harder than interns (fucked up dinos on the PT and got interns on the real test). On 59, I went -0 on everything else and -3 on RC on my PT.


I thought the Dino's game had more precedence in past tests. The interns had relatively little and the questions sucked!

I'd be satisfied with a -11.

User avatar
Ragged
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby Ragged » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:23 pm

3|ink wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:
3|ink wrote:Was PT 57 the dinos? That was not hard. Then again, difficulty is relative. I thought the interns game was hard.

PT59 - Many people have trouble with in and out games like the third on 59 (assuming that's december). LR was no walk in the park either. That was an all around hard test.

Lol we have different takes on the LSAT for sure.

I thought dinos was harder than interns (fucked up dinos on the PT and got interns on the real test). On 59, I went -0 on everything else and -3 on RC on my PT.


I thought the Dino's game had more precedence in past tests. The interns had relatively little and the questions sucked!

I'd be satisfied with a -11.


+1. The set up was rather open and I expected that the questions would give enough info to compensate for it, and how wrong was I! Each time I started to work on a question and then decided to move on in hopes of tackling the easier ones first I would get more panicked. Imagine what a nervous wreck I was when I realized that there were no easy questions...oh the horror. I think this game is gonna cause me to develop a phobia of games in general.

If someone ever comes up to me and asks which songs should be included in the playlist or something I will punch them in the face and start laughing hysterically.


Edit: I hope for a -11, but I think its not gonna be better than -10, cuz other than that game the test was really easy I thought.

User avatar
MarkRenton
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:54 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby MarkRenton » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:41 pm

Part of the reason why I'm saying -10; but more likely -9 than -11 is because I don't want to set myself up with higher expectations. But I also think what I'm saying is right.

Second, I didn't think interns was that much without precedent. I guess the more I think about, it maybe you guys are right... I feel the wild car is how people did on the third game. It seemed quite different, at least initially, than previous games. That said, it was NOT hard. But I'm wondering how much the oddity of it messed people up. This game was the perfect example of just staying cool and keeping a clear head.

User avatar
a11 1n
Posts: 183
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:48 pm

Re: June 2010 CURVE Predictions

Postby a11 1n » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:59 pm

MarkRenton wrote:This game was the perfect example of just staying cool and keeping a clear head.


In retrospect, I agree. Once I figured the game out at home, I realized it was not as hard as I was making it out to be. When I took the exam though I struggled with the last 2 questions on the second game so I decided to skip them and move to the third game which I read and had an initial reaction of confusion because I had never seen anything like it before. I moved to the interns game and really started panicking. Went back to the mulch/stones game and figured it out pretty quickly. Then moved back to the second game and took educated guesses on the last 2 questions. But when I went back to the fourth game I re-read it and it still did not come to me. I went through the questions hoping to find some gimmes and could not so I really started to lose my cool and it cost me.

When I got home I realized the mistake I was making, really not a hard game. God I would be happy with a 3/6 on that last game...




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: addie1412, batlaw, bearedman8, blackmamba8, dontsaywhatyoumean and 11 guests