PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram

mz253
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:18 pm

PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram

Postby mz253 » Thu May 13, 2010 4:43 pm

can anyone diagram this for me?

Thanks!

User avatar
Atlas LSAT Teacher
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:18 am

Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram

Postby Atlas LSAT Teacher » Thu May 13, 2010 5:05 pm

Here's a diagram and write-up of the game: http://www.atlaslsat.com/forums/game-4- ... -t264.html (not sure why the formatting on the forum is so wonky, but what you need is there).

I hope that helps.

User avatar
malfurion
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:40 pm

Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram

Postby malfurion » Thu May 13, 2010 5:08 pm

This is a tough question because you can really confuse yourself if you treat "ignore unpleasant realities" and "tell small lies" as two different symbols and start complicating things with ands/ors from contrapositives. If you just treat them as one unit, it becomes pretty simple.

abbreviations:
IRSL - Ignore unpleasant Realities and tell Small Lies
SINC - Sincerity
TR - Trust
SU - Succeed

sentence 1: IRSL --> not SINC
sentence 2: not TR --> not SU

contrapositive of 1: SINC --> not IRSL
contrapositive of 2: SU --> TR

conclusion (sentence 3): SU --> not IRSL

So the missing link is TR --> SINC, which is answer (A)

User avatar
Atlas LSAT Teacher
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:18 am

Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram

Postby Atlas LSAT Teacher » Thu May 13, 2010 5:18 pm

oops, I thought you were asking about a game in that PT. Here's an explanation for the LR question: http://www.atlaslsat.com/forums/pt48-s4 ... -t743.html

That sort of sloppy reading won't do for the LSAT!

mz253
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:18 pm

Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram

Postby mz253 » Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:17 pm

hey thank you so much! i wonder how did you translate the first sentence into a conditional statement. honestly, it took me a while to write a conditional statement based on the original sentence. What words make you think it's a conditional statement?

malfurion wrote:This is a tough question because you can really confuse yourself if you treat "ignore unpleasant realities" and "tell small lies" as two different symbols and start complicating things with ands/ors from contrapositives. If you just treat them as one unit, it becomes pretty simple.

abbreviations:
IRSL - Ignore unpleasant Realities and tell Small Lies
SINC - Sincerity
TR - Trust
SU - Succeed

sentence 1: IRSL --> not SINC
sentence 2: not TR --> not SU

contrapositive of 1: SINC --> not IRSL
contrapositive of 2: SU --> TR

conclusion (sentence 3): SU --> not IRSL

So the missing link is TR --> SINC, which is answer (A)

User avatar
Atlas LSAT Teacher
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:18 am

Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram

Postby Atlas LSAT Teacher » Thu Jun 03, 2010 7:01 pm

The signal word is "requiring"

mz253
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:18 pm

Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram

Postby mz253 » Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:13 pm

so the prevent A.. by requirting B should be

NO A -> B ??

I guess I'm thinking too much because I thought prevent A doesn't mean no A.
Thanks!

Atlas LSAT Teacher wrote:The signal word is "requiring"




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: B-Mo and 19 guests