Prep 16. Section 2. Question 23

eternallearner
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:11 pm

Prep 16. Section 2. Question 23

Postby eternallearner » Mon May 10, 2010 11:38 pm

Why can't (E) be correct. S has concluded that being allows one to fight and vote. However, T is concluding that being 17 allows only one to fight and NOT vote.

The correct answer is (D). What exactly is the "truth of a claim on which S's conclusion is based?"

Thank you!

jamesieee
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:14 pm

Re: Prep 16. Section 2. Question 23

Postby jamesieee » Tue May 11, 2010 12:59 am

T in fact never concludes what you claim he concludes. He merely undermined the support that S offers for his argument, which is what "challenging the truth of a claim on which S's conclusion is based" means. S's conclusion is that 17-year-olds must be allowed to vote; his support is that (a) anyone who is old enough to fight should be old enough to vote, and (b) 17-year-olds can fight. T questions the truth of (a) by suggesting that fighting and voting are different in nature, and one should not necessarily follow another.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests