2 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:14 pm
The flaw is the same as your other question that I just answered - mistaken negation. The official says that if [all the crap about communications and expense], then censorship exists, and therefore, anything else is not censorship. Again, just because A -> B does not mean ~A -> ~B. You want to look for the same mistaken negation in the answer.