BigA wrote:Knockglock wrote:Took PT 53 today, and wow it was tough! went -2 LR -0 LG -2 LR -3 RC for 93 raw/174 scaled. Pretty disappointing test...although as soon as I started on the first section I realized that this was a tough test. A little bummed, these newer tests I seem to average a lower score . I need to get back up to 175+!
53 -- 05/20/10 ----- -2 LR -0 LG -2 LR -3 RC ------ 93/174 ----- 5 sections, w/ 9.2 as 3rd experimental
Oh wow. Just realized we took the same PT! You didn't find the games devastatingly brutal? Oh my, I have to go back and review when I'm done here. But I thought it was the hardest games I've seen in the newer tests. Like I said, you are in another league than me as a test-taker. I scored higher in an LR section though
Hey congrats man! that's awesome! which LR section was it? I'm gonna guess that it was the 2nd one, I thought the first one was harder, but it might have been because I wasn't warmed up yet.
Yeah the games were pretty hard. 2 sequencing games of some form if I remember correctly. Sequencing are my weakest games too pretty much, so they were tough for me. 2 sequencing LG is pretty much a "worst-case" scenario for me. I think the PT I took yesterday had 2 sequencing games as well. I thought about trying Atlas LSAT's sequencing method, but I don't know if I want to completely switch up my technique this close to the test.
I thought the RC on this PT was pretty tough too. How did you do on that and the other sections?
Congrats again on the -0. That is a great feeling, and a definite confidence booster; especially if you did it on tough LR sections like this test.