Top Law Schools

rayiner wrote:

Desert Fox wrote:

ConsideringLawSchool wrote:I still think 180 gets the attention of Adcoms in a unique way, but I could be wrong. On the other hand, I don't think that a 4 hour test should really open the same doors for me that 4 years of hard academic work did for others. I have absolutely no regrets--especially if I can won that distinction of the most interesting application Harvard ever rejected

You aren't getting HLS. But Chi or CLS might bite on 3.25/180.

MVPDNC don't care about retakes, so go for 180.

Other posters are being excessively optimistic. Sub-3.5 is a very tough road at CCN regardless of LSAT, and pretty much a straight-up no-go at YHS. See: http://chicago.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0809/

In your shoes, I wouldn't retake anything 172 or over. YHSCCN is such a long shot with a 3.2x it's not worth the effort to retake. Maybe a 175+ would get you some money at MVPDNCG? I have no idea why that would be the case though...

existenz wrote:

ConsideringLawSchool wrote:As of now, based on responses, I think 177 is the highest score I will retake. Anything above is 75th everywhere I am looking. 177 or below and no reason not to take it in June.

Wait, you would retake a 177???

I would say retake a 175 or lower IF you are being honest with yourself on your PTs and truly scoring 177-180s all the time. Have you done PTs in the 40s-50s and had those scores?

Anyway, it's all speculation right now. The day you get your score, go to LSP and LSN (especially LSN) and see what your chances look like. That's the best way to figure out what you should do.

ConsideringLawSchool wrote:

rayiner wrote:

Desert Fox wrote:

ConsideringLawSchool wrote:I still think 180 gets the attention of Adcoms in a unique way, but I could be wrong. On the other hand, I don't think that a 4 hour test should really open the same doors for me that 4 years of hard academic work did for others. I have absolutely no regrets--especially if I can won that distinction of the most interesting application Harvard ever rejected

You aren't getting HLS. But Chi or CLS might bite on 3.25/180.

MVPDNC don't care about retakes, so go for 180.

Other posters are being excessively optimistic. Sub-3.5 is a very tough road at CCN regardless of LSAT, and pretty much a straight-up no-go at YHS. See: http://chicago.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0809/

In your shoes, I wouldn't retake anything 172 or over. YHSCCN is such a long shot with a 3.2x it's not worth the effort to retake. Maybe a 175+ would get you some money at MVPDNCG? I have no idea why that would be the case though...

Do you think Chicago would bite with 177+ if it were ED?

rayiner wrote:

ConsideringLawSchool wrote:

Desert Fox wrote:

ConsideringLawSchool wrote:I still think 180 gets the attention of Adcoms in a unique way, but I could be wrong. On the other hand, I don't think that a 4 hour test should really open the same doors for me that 4 years of hard academic work did for others. I have absolutely no regrets--especially if I can won that distinction of the most interesting application Harvard ever rejected

You aren't getting HLS. But Chi or CLS might bite on 3.25/180.

MVPDNC don't care about retakes, so go for 180.

Other posters are being excessively optimistic. Sub-3.5 is a very tough road at CCN regardless of LSAT, and pretty much a straight-up no-go at YHS. See: http://chicago.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0809/


Do you think Chicago would bite with 177+ if it were ED?

The probability is low enough that I wouldn't retake a 175 on that account. In the '08 cycle, there was only one sub-3.35 on LSN to get accepted into Chicago and he/she was a URM.

ConsideringLawSchool wrote:I would be very curious how many 178+ LSAT / 3.3- GPA applicants with great softs applied ED. I'd guess the number is quite low, but I don't know.

I was pretty honest with PTs... strictly timed, done in distracting environments, etc. I did most PTs in the 40s and 50s. I was consistently -0 on LGs, -0/1/2 on LR, and then RC was my weakness. Sometimes -1 but sometimes -3.

ConsideringLawSchool wrote:Want to join me in a pledge not to retake anything over 177? I'll keep you honest if you keep me honest?

whitman wrote:

ConsideringLawSchool wrote:Want to join me in a pledge not to retake anything over 177? I'll keep you honest if you keep me honest?

You are such a ridiculous person.

$1.99 wrote:i agree with the previous post, 180 twice in a row would get you in anywhere (June and October tests)

tomhobbes wrote:

$1.99 wrote:i agree with the previous post, 180 twice in a row would get you in anywhere (June and October tests)

Only two? Don't you run the risk of making schools believe that you were afraid you wouldn't get 180 the third time? A third 180 could at least get you off some waitlists...

tomhobbes wrote:

$1.99 wrote:i agree with the previous post, 180 twice in a row would get you in anywhere (June and October tests)

Only two? Don't you run the risk of making schools believe that you were afraid you wouldn't get 180 the third time? A third 180 could at least get you off some waitlists...