2 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:04 pm
Just did a practice Logical Reasoning test, made 3 mistakes (first was on Q1, ha), two of which dealt with argumentative techniques ("supporting a conclusion", "invoking a relevant generalization", that sort of thing). What self-study materials would you recommend to improve that particular area? Most of the programs (Kaplan, Powerscore, etc.) concentrate on logic/logical flaws, unless I've missed something in them.
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:53 am
yeah method of reasoning question types are generally neglected in most lsat prep books. off the top of my head, i would say pay close to transition words like 'but', 'although', 'despite', 'for example', as these types of words will indicate the function of the following (and often times, preceding) clause.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests