Feb LSAT

jcc9q3
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:04 pm

Feb LSAT

Postby jcc9q3 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:32 pm

I thought LG were hard. Everything else average...

cafloyd12
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:35 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby cafloyd12 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:34 pm

Agreed. I was sort of taken aback by that. The LG on the Sept. LSAT were MUCH easier. In my opinion, anyways. I wonder what the curve is going to be for this one.

User avatar
Gwen
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:54 am

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby Gwen » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:35 pm

You two must have scored a 120 ... the LGs were very easy

User avatar
charlesxavier
Posts: 444
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:51 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby charlesxavier » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:41 pm

Games were not extremely difficult, but they were all time wasters. My experimental games section was a breeze. Really disappointing.

gatorhoosier
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:22 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby gatorhoosier » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:42 pm

I
Last edited by gatorhoosier on Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cafloyd12
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:35 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby cafloyd12 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:42 pm

lol I certainly hope not since last time I scored a 164. I was hoping for at least a few points higher. But oh, well. I think there's different tests anyways.

Bruiser
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:54 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby Bruiser » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:51 pm

They were timewasters, you're right, now that I think about it. It wasn't that they were too hard to figure out, it just took a few minutes. LG are my weakest area and I thought I had them down, but I guess not. I finally gave up on one and did the other 3. I ended up guessing on a few. Overall, I think I probably got about 10 wrong total for that section.

User avatar
Gwen
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:54 am

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby Gwen » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:53 pm

Bruiser wrote:They were timewasters, you're right, now that I think about it. It wasn't that they were too hard to figure out, it just took a few minutes. LG are my weakest area and I thought I had them down, but I guess not. I finally gave up on one and did the other 3. I ended up guessing on a few. Overall, I think I probably got about 10 wrong total for that section.

What is your score goal?

eros
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:18 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby eros » Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:10 pm

Bruiser wrote:They were timewasters, you're right, now that I think about it. It wasn't that they were too hard to figure out, it just took a few minutes. LG are my weakest area and I thought I had them down, but I guess not. I finally gave up on one and did the other 3. I ended up guessing on a few. Overall, I think I probably got about 10 wrong total for that section.


I absolutely agree with this assessment. I've taken the past three lsats now, and i've definitely noticed a trend toward this as well as lsac seems to be trying to counter against people who are overprepared for the "standard" LG game types.

becauseimaddicted
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:11 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby becauseimaddicted » Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:35 pm

I found LG easy (its kind of freaking me out that everyone else struggled...maybe I missed something?) and LR and RC on the harder side. There were about 5 questions I wasn't sure about in both my RC and second LR section...hopefully I'm a good guesser (as I was able to narrow all of them down) and went -2 or -3 on each.

Am hoping the scores will be released ASAP so I can finally complete my applications. I know I did better than September and December (161 and 160).

User avatar
Gwen
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:54 am

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby Gwen » Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:49 pm

becauseimaddicted wrote:I found LG easy (its kind of freaking me out that everyone else struggled...maybe I missed something?) and LR and RC on the harder side. There were about 5 questions I wasn't sure about in both my RC and second LR section...hopefully I'm a good guesser (as I was able to narrow all of them down) and went -2 or -3 on each.

Am hoping the scores will be released ASAP so I can finally complete my applications. I know I did better than September and December (161 and 160).

The LG was easy for me too. I usually get them all right(except during the June 2009 exam :oops: ).

thekingiv
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:15 am

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby thekingiv » Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:00 pm

Peter North wrote:
jcc9q3 wrote:I thought LG were hard. Everything else average...


Yep... third one I did well in in LG 3, but it was the fake one...

some stuff on the third one... faculty/student presentation... Friday/Saturday thing..

but the Gatherings and Heartfire games PWNED me.


Dude, what was that last one? I have no recollection of it. And I remember professors but no students. Am I crazy?

mazz
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:55 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby mazz » Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:04 pm

professors and students? i completely don't remember this game.

cgs230
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:25 am

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby cgs230 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:20 pm

I thought RC was toughest...ran out of time. LG always is my weakest, but overall I thought it was ... okay.

Who knows. Even on practice tests I think I'm doing terrible and turn out ok. Except the only difference is here I have to wait 3 weeks!

kacee
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:01 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby kacee » Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:29 pm

becauseimaddicted wrote:I found LG easy (its kind of freaking me out that everyone else struggled...maybe I missed something?)


I feel the same way, but then again I felt that way taking the most recent practice test LGs I had available (55, 56, 57). I think doing a great number of much earlier LGs helped a lot. Some of the questions this time certainly took a little while (had to diagram hypotheticals for almost every answer) but I thought they were all exceptionally straightforward, to the point where I was just straight worried that I had made some incorrect inference that was making it so easy.

I could still be right. This is my greatest fear.

Demeter
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:54 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby Demeter » Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:35 pm

I think the one you are not remembering was the experimental one, (RIGHT??!!!) I really hope so because I felt WAY better about the other one. Both LG's had students on them, but the one I took that I am thinking was experimental had one w/ students/teachers and 2 work days.

User avatar
s0ph1e2007
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby s0ph1e2007 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:37 pm

I had two LGs as my sections 1 and 2 and I just could not calm down in time I think.
My average LG score is -0 and ranges from -0 to -1 and I just felt overwhelmed by the LG sections


:( oh well my cycle is next year ill check the score and retake it in june if i dont like it

User avatar
Thirteen
Posts: 23883
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby Thirteen » Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:40 pm

Gwen wrote:You two must have scored a 120 ... the LGs were very easy


I thought the games were hard, but I'm sure I scored higher than a 120 (retaking a decent score). Take the bitchiness somewhere else.

User avatar
Gwen
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:54 am

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby Gwen » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:29 pm

Thirteen wrote:
Gwen wrote:You two must have scored a 120 ... the LGs were very easy


I thought the games were hard, but I'm sure I scored higher than a 120 (retaking a decent score). Take the bitchiness somewhere else.

:roll: Take the pussiness somewhere else

User avatar
monkeyboy
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:11 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby monkeyboy » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:19 am

Gwen wrote:
Thirteen wrote:
Gwen wrote:You two must have scored a 120 ... the LGs were very easy


I thought the games were hard, but I'm sure I scored higher than a 120 (retaking a decent score). Take the bitchiness somewhere else.

:roll: Take the pussiness somewhere else


Meow!

User avatar
TheTopBloke
Posts: 486
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 7:29 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby TheTopBloke » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:28 am

Fuck the February LSAT!

JSIM462
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:20 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby JSIM462 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:32 am

Gwen wrote:
becauseimaddicted wrote:I found LG easy (its kind of freaking me out that everyone else struggled...maybe I missed something?) and LR and RC on the harder side. There were about 5 questions I wasn't sure about in both my RC and second LR section...hopefully I'm a good guesser (as I was able to narrow all of them down) and went -2 or -3 on each.

Am hoping the scores will be released ASAP so I can finally complete my applications. I know I did better than September and December (161 and 160).

The LG was easy for me too. I usually get them all right(except during the June 2009 exam :oops: ).


Those damn dinosaurs....

novaman14
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:46 am

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby novaman14 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:51 am

for people who had 2 experimental logic games, which one do you think was the actual experimental one......or if you didnt have two logic games, what was one of the you had in yoursection. IM trying to figure this out because I might cancel if the one section of my logic games was not experimental because it was incredibly difficult for me and i left way to many blank to have any chance of getting a score i want.

7ED
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:26 pm

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby 7ED » Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:01 am

I F**#*#)($*& SWEAR. I hate logical reasoning experimentals SO much.

ANyways, im glad im not the only one who had trouble with the logic games. I must admit though, I don't think it was because it was hard so much as I got cocky. I finished the first section (LR) 10 minutes early, and i sauntered out to the bathroom (after double checking) thinking im the shit. Never checked my watch for the LG, and took my time checking answers. When he called 5 minutes, i had to speed through.

I missed 3 questions, on one, i guessed, on another I think i crossed out some of the worst answer choices, so 50/50 or slightly less, and on the last I think I had the recent answer, though not too certain (A for number 23 hopefully? XD).

HUBRIS > me.

I averaged 178 on the practice tests, but i used to rely on the logic games as free marks. Im seriously considering cancelling this and retaking.

fes456
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 5:14 am

Re: Feb LSAT

Postby fes456 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 5:20 am

dude cancel it...I'm the same way I never get more than 1 or 2 wrong on the games, but ended up guessing on 3 questions on the non-experimental game section...I'm not canceling mine only because I think I did better than I usually do on the other 3 sections (I have a hard time on RC)

shooting for a 174, and depending on the curve I think I have a good chance of getting it




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: #gobroncos, bearedman8, BobBoblaw, dontsaywhatyoumean, Greenteachurro, Lahtso Nuggin, mrgstephe, wildquest8200 and 16 guests