How'd it go?

User avatar
s0ph1e2007
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby s0ph1e2007 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:54 pm

idkmybffjill wrote:What wast the shipworms question again? About salinity in water, right? Was that an assumption or weaken question?


yea does anyone remember those options
im pretty sure the answer wasnt about salinity in other oceans
i remember it being difficult but being positive about my answer. LR is my section.
Too bad I though LG was my section too until today :(

User avatar
existenz
Posts: 927
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:06 am

Re: How'd it go?

Postby existenz » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:01 pm

This is from the Wikipedia entry on Shipwrecks:

Salinity of water

Shipwrecks typically decay rapidly when in seawater; shipwrecks in some freshwater lakes, such as the Great Lakes of North America, have remained intact with little degradation. There are two reasons for this:

* Iron-based metals corrode much more quickly in seawater because of the dissolved salt present; the sodium and chloride ions chemically accelerate the process of metal oxidation which, in the case of ferrous metals, leads to rust.
* Bacteria found in seawater cause the wood on ships to rot more quickly than in freshwater.

In some sea areas, most notably in Gulf of Bothnia and Gulf of Finland, salinity is very low, and centuries-old wrecks have been preserved in reasonable condition.

I'm just hoping the LSAC version of reality doesn't have to conform to our reality.

RCG37
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:49 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby RCG37 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:02 pm

I feel shipwrecked after today...pun clearly intended. especially since that question came at the very end of the entire exam.

Anyhow, I had LR-LG-LR-RC-LR, all three LR's had 25 questions
it really chaps my as* when the LR is the experimental because now there's no way of knowing which was the experimental..

baneofmyexistence
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:36 pm

Re: How'd it go?--Logic Games Section

Postby baneofmyexistence » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:06 pm

rosalbavillanueva wrote::oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

LG-LR-LG-LR-RC
The First Section of Games was the real deal. The Hikers/Process Server/Zulla and Taylor/and i think the other game was about professors

The Second Games Section was a breeze, but unfortunately wasn't the Experimental.


you state this as if it were a fact. why?

User avatar
existenz
Posts: 927
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:06 am

Re: How'd it go?--Logic Games Section

Postby existenz » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:23 pm

baneofmyexistence wrote:
rosalbavillanueva wrote::oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

LG-LR-LG-LR-RC
The First Section of Games was the real deal. The Hikers/Process Server/Zulla and Taylor/and i think the other game was about professors

The Second Games Section was a breeze, but unfortunately wasn't the Experimental.


you state this as if it were a fact. why?

Because the people with only one LG had Hikers. Therefore it is the real one.

lokkier8
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:07 am

Re: How'd it go?

Postby lokkier8 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:32 pm

did anyone get the "bridges" question in their LR? Is it the real LR or the experimental?

idkmybffjill
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby idkmybffjill » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:34 pm

lokkier8 wrote:did anyone get the "bridges" question in their LR? Is it the real LR or the experimental?


I had only 2 LR and one had the bridges question...it was in the first 5 and def threw me off my 1-10 rhythm!

tomwatts
Posts: 1551
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am

Re: How'd it go?

Postby tomwatts » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:34 pm

lokkier8 wrote:did anyone get the "bridges" question in their LR? Is it the real LR or the experimental?

About their length? Yeah, that was real. And it was a party in itself.

algid1113
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:18 am

Re: How'd it go?

Postby algid1113 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:47 pm

let's just say... i hate edith wharton!!!

RCG37
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:49 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby RCG37 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:03 pm

what about babbling babies in LR?

tomwatts
Posts: 1551
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am

Re: How'd it go?

Postby tomwatts » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:42 pm

RCG37 wrote:what about babbling babies in LR?

That one I don't remember. Might be experimental.

idkmybffjill
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby idkmybffjill » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:49 pm

tomwatts wrote:
RCG37 wrote:what about babbling babies in LR?

That one I don't remember. Might be experimental.


There was one question early on in one of the LR's about babies having keen hearing etc but losing it after the first yr etc.?

User avatar
uganik
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:40 am

Re: How'd it go?

Postby uganik » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:59 pm

.

tomwatts
Posts: 1551
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am

Re: How'd it go?

Postby tomwatts » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:06 pm

idkmybffjill wrote:
tomwatts wrote:
RCG37 wrote:what about babbling babies in LR?

That one I don't remember. Might be experimental.


There was one question early on in one of the LR's about babies having keen hearing etc but losing it after the first yr etc.?

Oh yeah! That was real.

User avatar
robin600
Posts: 1583
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby robin600 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:21 pm

keg411 wrote:
rtvendetti wrote:
MBZags wrote:
rtvendetti wrote:ours was cancelled...so how were the lg? im curious if we will get the same test on the retake


You won't.



they would make a whole new test even on a nondisclosed? it will be nex saturday, well so says the lsac rep i talked to..they must have extra tests or somethng


They have multiple tests to begin with (i.e. foreign tests, Sabbath tests, etc.). LSAC was likely prepared. For all we know, they could also give us a previous undisclosed test that was any of the following as well. We definitely will not get the same test that was given today.

IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.

User avatar
Xizenta
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:53 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby Xizenta » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:42 pm

.

keg411
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby keg411 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:44 pm

robin600 wrote:IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.


Really? That's interesting. I always thought they had a bunch of different tests.
Last edited by keg411 on Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
robin600
Posts: 1583
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby robin600 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:45 pm

imisscollege wrote:I, as a previous 168er, 170+ practice tester respectfully disagree with that answer. Although I did have to read it a few times and I obviously could be quite wrong. (the mineral used to cook answer)
Last edited by robin600 on Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
s0ph1e2007
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby s0ph1e2007 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:46 pm

What would happen if i posted an answer on here.
..
Does it matter?

User avatar
robin600
Posts: 1583
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby robin600 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:47 pm

keg411 wrote:
robin600 wrote:IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.


Really? That's interesting. I always thought they had a bunch of different tests.

Yeah, that was June though and it was disclosed. I took the test today at 10am (instead of 830), and it was all the same questions as well. :) (hehehe, I know which section exactly is experimental!!! cuz I didn't have to take it!!! I'm sorry that was cruel).

User avatar
Xizenta
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:53 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby Xizenta » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:47 pm

.

keg411
Posts: 5935
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby keg411 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:49 pm

robin600 wrote:
keg411 wrote:
robin600 wrote:IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.


Really? That's interesting. I always thought they had a bunch of different tests.

Yeah, that was June though and it was disclosed. I took the test today at 10am (instead of 830), and it was all the same questions as well. :) (hehehe, I know which section exactly is experimental!!! cuz I didn't have to take it!!! I'm sorry that was cruel).


Oh well, I guess I'll find out when they do the make up tests :).
BTW, hope you did well enough to get off of some of those crazy WL's!

User avatar
robin600
Posts: 1583
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby robin600 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:51 pm

.

User avatar
robin600
Posts: 1583
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: How'd it go?

Postby robin600 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:52 pm

keg411 wrote:
robin600 wrote:
keg411 wrote:
robin600 wrote:IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.


Really? That's interesting. I always thought they had a bunch of different tests.

Yeah, that was June though and it was disclosed. I took the test today at 10am (instead of 830), and it was all the same questions as well. :) (hehehe, I know which section exactly is experimental!!! cuz I didn't have to take it!!! I'm sorry that was cruel).


Oh well, I guess I'll find out when they do the make up tests :).
BTW, hope you did well enough to get off of some of those crazy WL's!

Umm me 2! me 2! I will probably score the exact same as before, because that's how life is friends, uggh

bakemono
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:54 am

Re: How'd it go?

Postby bakemono » Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:58 am

vampy wrote:I thought the LG was very tough, probably even harder than the December 2009 LG which was the toughest in years. It looks like LSAC has found a way to write LG questions that can't be easily solved by wrote.

With that said, I think I got all of the LG right but there was a ton of room for error.


3 basic linears and a grouping is suddenly hard now?

And honestly, i thought 59 was one of the easiest LSAT's in recent history. My friend agrees too. We're kicking ourselves that we didn't take it, cause we would've both scored in the mid 170's with that ridiculous curve.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], cherrygalore, Yahoo [Bot] and 7 guests