7 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:47 pm
I would assume it has to do with how much time you have to dedicate. I studied for two months, but wasn't working or in school at the time. I felt pretty tip top going in. So the answer is absolutely yes if you aren't busy with other stuff.
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am
four months is more than enough. thats 16 weeks, 32 PT's if you do 2 a week. Hell even if you skip a couple weeks you'll be atleast getting 20 in. Just have to use your time effectively - 4 months of ineffective studying is not as good as 2 months of effective.
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:22 am
JDHopeful wrote:Thanks for the advice!
Also, as a point of reference, I work 40 hours per week (I graduated undergrad this past summer).
I've been trying to study 3-4 hours per night, with 5+ hours per day on the weekends...
This should be more than enough if you're studying that much since that's about 25 hours/week. Be aware that different people need different amounts of time so try to figure out a goal in terms of how much material you want to go through, and if 4 months is sufficient for that, then you should be fine.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: bmathers and 18 guests