s0ph1e2007 wrote:dreamscometrue wrote:
Sophie, I would suggest doing 59 instead. 59 has an objectively harder RC section, and (imo) a more difficult LR section as well. Plus, it's the most recent test. I think it's pretty good practice.
rggh I wish they would just accidentally forget to include RC in the feb test. I hate my variations on it. In a timed setting today was the first time I didnt get a single question wrong, usually i get 1-3, and I feel like that was a fluke (although I did do it differnetly- I didnt underline, only circled a few key terms and read very slowly so that I never had to look back at the essay and was confident with answers)
there's so much variation though, im convinced we'll end up with some insane LG that has like 30 different variables and a RC passage that's a whole page long on the genetic transformation of some lating named fly.
See, I love those science passages on genetics, flies, salamanders, you name it. What I can't stand are the damn passages about some author defying conventional writing technique etc., those are brutal.