october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2 Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
pad

New
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:30 pm

october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2

Post by pad » Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:37 am

x
Last edited by pad on Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

Cambridge LSAT

Bronze
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2

Post by Cambridge LSAT » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:08 am

To see why choice C is credited, negate it. What if it were sometimes true that ideal bureaucracies were permanently without complaints falling outside their regulations? This would substantially weaken the conclusion. Choice E is not required because every ("any" in the answer choice) complaint doesn't have to meet this criteria. Negating it leaves open the possibility that some complaints do meet the stated criteria.

User avatar
pad

New
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:30 pm

Re: october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2

Post by pad » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:13 am

thank you for taking the time to help. negating absolutely makes sense.

User avatar
Richie Tenenbaum

Gold
Posts: 2118
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am

Re: october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2

Post by Richie Tenenbaum » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:16 am

mods will not like you posting a complete question. Prob best to delete it (in the future just post where the question can be found. It's a little harder to get an immediate response, but it avoids issues with LSAC).

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”