october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2

User avatar
pad
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:30 pm

october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2

Postby pad » Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:37 am

x
Last edited by pad on Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

Cambridge LSAT
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2

Postby Cambridge LSAT » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:08 am

To see why choice C is credited, negate it. What if it were sometimes true that ideal bureaucracies were permanently without complaints falling outside their regulations? This would substantially weaken the conclusion. Choice E is not required because every ("any" in the answer choice) complaint doesn't have to meet this criteria. Negating it leaves open the possibility that some complaints do meet the stated criteria.

User avatar
pad
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:30 pm

Re: october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2

Postby pad » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:13 am

thank you for taking the time to help. negating absolutely makes sense.

User avatar
Richie Tenenbaum
Posts: 2162
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am

Re: october 2008 LR question 19. LR 2

Postby Richie Tenenbaum » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:16 am

mods will not like you posting a complete question. Prob best to delete it (in the future just post where the question can be found. It's a little harder to get an immediate response, but it avoids issues with LSAC).




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”