Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment? Forum
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:15 pm
Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
If the lower enrollment rates continue, will employment get better? Is this flawed reasoning?
30 year low in applications this year should allow for less competition for the class of 2016 for jobs.
30 year low in applications this year should allow for less competition for the class of 2016 for jobs.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:05 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
I don't think so initially. Enrollment is falling by a lower rate than the apps are, schools are just dipping deeper into the applicant pool/accepting people with lower numbers. For now. If it really becomes a crisis -- if apps drop to 40k a year or something -- then we may see schools really starting to die off (at the bottom fringes) or drastically cut class sizes. This process is going to take a while.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Well lower enrollment is only sort of related to applications. Schools can and do lower standards. Lower enrollment will help. But only so much. Half of all students aren't really getting law jobs as it is. You'd need enrollment to fall by a large percent to see good outcomes for most students.resilience99 wrote:If the lower enrollment rates continue, will employment get better? Is this flawed reasoning?
30 year low in applications this year should allow for less competition for the class of 2016 for jobs.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:15 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
there is an estimate of 38,000 matriculating http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/educa ... .html?_r=1&wisdom wrote:I don't think so initially. Enrollment is falling by a lower rate than the apps are, schools are just dipping deeper into the applicant pool/accepting people with lower numbers. For now. If it really becomes a crisis -- if apps drop to 40k a year or something -- then we may see schools really starting to die off (at the bottom fringes) or drastically cut class sizes. This process is going to take a while.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Basically thisDesert Fox wrote:Well lower enrollment is only sort of related to applications. Schools can and do lower standards. Lower enrollment will help. But only so much. Half of all students aren't really getting law jobs as it is. You'd need enrollment to fall by a large percent to see good outcomes for most students.resilience99 wrote:If the lower enrollment rates continue, will employment get better? Is this flawed reasoning?
30 year low in applications this year should allow for less competition for the class of 2016 for jobs.
With like 25,000 jobs, not all of which are good, and 44,000 enrolees (rough numbers), a bunch of people are still gonna get shitjobs or nojob
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
IIRC that 25k jobs thing was pre ITE right?rad lulz wrote:Basically thisDesert Fox wrote:Well lower enrollment is only sort of related to applications. Schools can and do lower standards. Lower enrollment will help. But only so much. Half of all students aren't really getting law jobs as it is. You'd need enrollment to fall by a large percent to see good outcomes for most students.resilience99 wrote:If the lower enrollment rates continue, will employment get better? Is this flawed reasoning?
30 year low in applications this year should allow for less competition for the class of 2016 for jobs.
With like 25,000 jobs, not all of which are good, and 44,000 enrolees (rough numbers), a bunch of people are still gonna get shitjobs or nojob
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:15 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
The estimate enrollees is 38,000. Assuming 35,000 actually graduate, thats a whole lot less competition. Also this is assuming that the job market will not improve naturally.rad lulz wrote:Basically thisDesert Fox wrote:Well lower enrollment is only sort of related to applications. Schools can and do lower standards. Lower enrollment will help. But only so much. Half of all students aren't really getting law jobs as it is. You'd need enrollment to fall by a large percent to see good outcomes for most students.resilience99 wrote:If the lower enrollment rates continue, will employment get better? Is this flawed reasoning?
30 year low in applications this year should allow for less competition for the class of 2016 for jobs.
With like 25,000 jobs, not all of which are good, and 44,000 enrolees (rough numbers), a bunch of people are still gonna get shitjobs or nojob
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Link? I just pulled the 2011-2012 cycleresilience99 wrote:The estimate enrollees is 38,000. Assuming 35,000 actually graduate, thats a whole lot less competition. Also this is assuming that the job market will not improve naturally.rad lulz wrote:Basically thisDesert Fox wrote:Well lower enrollment is only sort of related to applications. Schools can and do lower standards. Lower enrollment will help. But only so much. Half of all students aren't really getting law jobs as it is. You'd need enrollment to fall by a large percent to see good outcomes for most students.resilience99 wrote:If the lower enrollment rates continue, will employment get better? Is this flawed reasoning?
30 year low in applications this year should allow for less competition for the class of 2016 for jobs.
With like 25,000 jobs, not all of which are good, and 44,000 enrolees (rough numbers), a bunch of people are still gonna get shitjobs or nojob
35k is still plenty of people getting shitjobs or nojob
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:15 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
The estimate enrollees is 38,000. Assuming 35,000 actually graduate, thats a whole lot less competition. Also this is assuming that the job market will not improve naturally.[/quote]
Link? I just pulled the 2011-2012 cycle
35k is still plenty of people getting shitjobs or nojob[/quote]
I am talking about the estimated enrollment in 2013 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/educa ... .html?_r=1&
Link? I just pulled the 2011-2012 cycle
35k is still plenty of people getting shitjobs or nojob[/quote]
I am talking about the estimated enrollment in 2013 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/educa ... .html?_r=1&
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Even if enrollment rates continue to fall and the economy improves, that doesn't mean that the legal job market will improve.
Many law firms are trying to cut back on their labor costs by increasing their use of contract attorneys, e-discovery tools, using software to draft basic agreements instead of 1st and 2nd years etc. This is probably going to result in less attorney positions even as the economy improves.
Many law firms are trying to cut back on their labor costs by increasing their use of contract attorneys, e-discovery tools, using software to draft basic agreements instead of 1st and 2nd years etc. This is probably going to result in less attorney positions even as the economy improves.
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:48 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
I was planning on making a detailed post about this with statistics/projections at some point. Basically, yeah, employment outcomes should improve by a decent margin across the board.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Most law jobs are pure shit.Betharl wrote:I was planning on making a detailed post about this with statistics/projections at some point. Basically, yeah, employment outcomes should improve by a decent margin across the board.
Only in the last two years was getting A JOB considered a victory. It's not.
-
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:20 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Definitely flawed reasoning. Lower enrollment rates don't "improve" legal employment. Legal employment is not dependent on enrollment.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:15 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Less graduates competing for jobs.AllTheLawz wrote:Definitely flawed reasoning. Lower enrollment rates don't "improve" legal employment. Legal employment is not dependent on enrollment.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
If you paid $100k+ for some crappy job, does it really matter?resilience99 wrote:Less graduates competing for jobs.AllTheLawz wrote:Definitely flawed reasoning. Lower enrollment rates don't "improve" legal employment. Legal employment is not dependent on enrollment.
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:01 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
This might be true in a a vacuum, or in fairytale land, but the real world is neither of these things. While lower enrollment means less graduates competing for jobs, there is still a large pool of unemployed attorneys from past graduating classes. Thus, a small difference in the size of one year's graduating class is unlikely to significantly mitigate the employment issues that graduates will face three years down the road.resilience99 wrote:Less graduates competing for jobs.AllTheLawz wrote:Definitely flawed reasoning. Lower enrollment rates don't "improve" legal employment. Legal employment is not dependent on enrollment.
- NoodleyOne
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Eh, I don't think this is correct. Many who missed out have likely moved on to other fields. Also, legal hiring largely takes place directly from law school, which gives students an advantage that people that are out of school don't have. Also, if someone has been out of legal employment for years and is still looking, there is likely a significant gap in their resume which will further hurt their chances.SFSpartan wrote:This might be true in a a vacuum, or in fairytale land, but the real world is neither of these things. While lower enrollment means less graduates competing for jobs, there is still a large pool of unemployed attorneys from past graduating classes. Thus, a small difference in the size of one year's graduating class is unlikely to significantly mitigate the employment issues that graduates will face three years down the road.resilience99 wrote:Less graduates competing for jobs.AllTheLawz wrote:Definitely flawed reasoning. Lower enrollment rates don't "improve" legal employment. Legal employment is not dependent on enrollment.
It should help. How much is hard to tell.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- JDndMSW
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:32 am
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
What about if YOUR school in particular has pretty dramatically lowered their enrollment numbers over the past few years? As long as you are looking in their major market wouldn't it be safe to assume it will help? Obviously not a ton but better than maybe this current graduating class that has 80ish more students?
- Ruxin1
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:12 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
I doubt it will change the grades places are looking for.JDndMSW wrote:What about if YOUR school in particular has pretty dramatically lowered their enrollment numbers over the past few years? As long as you are looking in their major market wouldn't it be safe to assume it will help? Obviously not a ton but better than maybe this current graduating class that has 80ish more students?
-
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
That is true for grades at most schools and most top firms, but most big law places are willing to take students at the mushy median of T14 schools; but due to economy/supply of student, some T14 schools have still had a hard time placing their medianish student. But the 10% decrease in class sizes across many T1 schools might open up 2-3 more spots for the top schools where grades matter less. Of course, this minor change will hardly be felt in any anecdotal way, and may just be a statistical blip of about 3% which is like impossible to really feel.Ruxin1 wrote:I doubt it will change the grades places are looking for.JDndMSW wrote:What about if YOUR school in particular has pretty dramatically lowered their enrollment numbers over the past few years? As long as you are looking in their major market wouldn't it be safe to assume it will help? Obviously not a ton but better than maybe this current graduating class that has 80ish more students?
Example: a T1/T2 school with 250 per class decreases to 220 student. That means 30 less students, of which 3 would have been top 10%. That means 3 less students for medianish students at T14 schools to compete with for Big Law jobs. Of course, this applies across the board, so 3 x 40 schools that drop 10% would be 120 more spots? Totally random numbers, but the general principle holds.
tldr: not much affect for bottom, but might see slight blip at the top, but not enough to be noticeable in a tangible way.
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Employers have cut offs at each school that are based on either GPA or rank. The number of students graduating do not affect those numbers. A decrease in enrollment would lead to employers hiring more from either (1) schools that don't rank or (2) lower ranked schools (i.e. top 10% at T3, and top 5% at T4).
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
The cut offs are harder for the top firms, but mushier for the lower down big firms (for top schools) - and comes down to interviewing a lot for the top schools. History has shown that firms would rather have medianish students from prestigious schools than digging deeper into other lower schools. None of us have proof and you're welcome to disagree. But the fact that back in 2007 schools like NYU and CLS had 93-95% offer rates during OCI is evidence that firms were willing to dig deeper into top schools (for the prefstige) but still maintained grade cut offs for lower schools (as even then, nowhere near 40% of lower schools were placing into Big Law)Aberzombie1892 wrote:Employers have cut offs at each school that are based on either GPA or rank. The number of students graduating do not affect those numbers. A decrease in enrollment would lead to employers hiring more from either (1) schools that don't rank or (2) lower ranked schools (i.e. top 10% at T3, and top 5% at T4).
Last edited by thelawyler on Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- NoodleyOne
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
Source? Hell, anecdote to support this, even? Why would they dig deeper at schools where they probably don't go to for OCI instead of schools where they traditionally take numerous SAs from?Aberzombie1892 wrote:Employers have cut offs at each school that are based on either GPA or rank. The number of students graduating do not affect those numbers. A decrease in enrollment would lead to employers hiring more from either (1) schools that don't rank or (2) lower ranked schools (i.e. top 10% at T3, and top 5% at T4).
- JDndMSW
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:32 am
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
My school has gone from 203 in 2010 in 155 this past years class and I have heard our class will likely be about 10 or so smaller (I believe they said this to us at ASW). I am not looking for biglaw so I guess this doesn't apply to me the same way.
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: Will lower enrollment rates improve legal employment?
We aren't disagreeing. When I said schools that don't rank, I was referring to T18 schools that don't rank their students. Almost every other school ranks at least 10-33% of their class.thelawyler wrote:The cut offs are harder for the top firms, but mushier for the lower down big firms (for top schools) - and comes down to interviewing a lot for the top schools. History has shown that firms would rather have medianish students from prestigious schools than digging deeper into other lower schools. None of us have proof and you're welcome to disagree. But the fact that back in 2007 schools like NYU and CLS had 93-95% offer rates during OCI is evidence that firms were willing to dig deeper into top schools (for the prefstige) but still maintained grade cut offs for lower schools (as even then, nowhere near 40% of lower schools were placing into Big Law)Aberzombie1892 wrote:Employers have cut offs at each school that are based on either GPA or rank. The number of students graduating do not affect those numbers. A decrease in enrollment would lead to employers hiring more from either (1) schools that don't rank or (2) lower ranked schools (i.e. top 10% at T3, and top 5% at T4).
While in hindsight I see how that may have been confusing in abstract (schools that don't rank - their students vs. schools that don't rank - US News), I felt like the context of the discussion would have made that fairly clear.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login