Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

(Please Ask Questions and Answer Questions)

Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible?

Yes
120
50%
No
78
32%
F___ Y__
26
11%
Why?
13
5%
WITIDEven...
5
2%
 
Total votes: 242

User avatar
Mr. Pancakes
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Mr. Pancakes » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:10 pm

laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

User avatar
Tom Joad
Posts: 4542
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Tom Joad » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:10 pm

laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

You have to keep Busch. And :lol: at this Nebraska idea.

User avatar
shifty_eyed
Posts: 1934
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby shifty_eyed » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:11 pm

Mr. Pancakes wrote:
laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

From what I remember of freshman year, I agree.

User avatar
Tom Joad
Posts: 4542
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Tom Joad » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:11 pm

Mr. Pancakes wrote:
laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

Busch > Natty > Keystone

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby alwayssunnyinfl » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:12 pm

shifty_eyed wrote:
Mr. Pancakes wrote:
laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

From what I remember of freshman year, I agree.

You're not a freshman anymore?

User avatar
shifty_eyed
Posts: 1934
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby shifty_eyed » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:13 pm

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
shifty_eyed wrote:
Mr. Pancakes wrote:
laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

From what I remember of freshman year, I agree.

You're not a freshman anymore?

In maturity-level only

User avatar
jkpolk
Posts: 896
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby jkpolk » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:13 pm

Mr. Pancakes wrote:
laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

keystone>natty>>>>PBR>>>>>>>>>>>BEAST>Busch Lite

So let it be known

User avatar
Mr. Pancakes
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Mr. Pancakes » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:14 pm

shifty_eyed wrote:
Mr. Pancakes wrote:
laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

From what I remember of freshman year, I agree.


Image

Tom Joad wrote:
Mr. Pancakes wrote:
laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

Busch > Natty > Keystone

Image

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby alwayssunnyinfl » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:15 pm

Will we still have to take state bar exams or will this be a UW-Madison type deal?

User avatar
Tom Joad
Posts: 4542
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Tom Joad » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:15 pm

Tom Joad wrote:
Mr. Pancakes wrote:
laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

Busch > Natty > Keystone

Image[/quote]
I will leave TLS over this. It is an important issue to me.

User avatar
Mr. Pancakes
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Mr. Pancakes » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:16 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
shifty_eyed
Posts: 1934
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby shifty_eyed » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:16 pm

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:Will we still have to take state bar exams or will this be a UW-Madison type deal?

Below median has to take the bar.

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby alwayssunnyinfl » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:18 pm

shifty_eyed wrote:
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:Will we still have to take state bar exams or will this be a UW-Madison type deal?

Below median has to take the bar.

That should be a universal policy

User avatar
Lawl Shcool
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Lawl Shcool » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:32 pm

I don't support closing of law schools. Without TTT's I would not have had the opportunity to attend law school at all. Attending law school ended up being the best thing to ever happen in my life and I legit am grateful for my original school making it possible for me to attend and prove myself. I realize I am in the minority here but that is how I feel. My opinion is obviously biased because it all worked out for me in the end.

I think a much better system would be making it harder to get loans rather than closing schools.

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby alwayssunnyinfl » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:33 pm

Lawl Shcool wrote:I don't support closing of law schools. Without TTT's I would not have had the opportunity to attend law school at all. Attending law school ended up being the best thing to ever happen in my life and I legit am grateful for my original school making it possible for me to attend and prove myself. I realize I am in the minority here but that is how I feel. My opinion is obviously biased because it all worked out for me in the end.

I think a much better system would be making it harder to get loans rather than closing schools.


Uhm, so instead of closing bad schools with bad prospects, you'd rather make it more difficult for people who barely get into great schools to afford it?

User avatar
Mr. Pancakes
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Mr. Pancakes » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:36 pm

Lawl Shcool wrote: I think a much better system would be making it harder to get loans rather than closing schools.

FWIW, poor people aren't as smart as people who aren't poor, so I think this makes sense.

jim-green
Posts: 808
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby jim-green » Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:24 pm

.
Last edited by jim-green on Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RedBirds2011
Posts: 623
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby RedBirds2011 » Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:27 pm

jim-green wrote:
Mr. Pancakes wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote: I think a much better system would be making it harder to get loans rather than closing schools.

FWIW, poor people aren't as smart as people who aren't poor, so I think this makes sense.
I worked on this today at the office, and here is what I think the number of law schools should be capped at.
\int \frac{dx}{1+ax}=\frac{1}{a}\ln(1+ax)+C \ , where x = number of law jobs, a = total outstanding loans, and C = US news rank – 47.





The answer is clearly...42.

User avatar
Colonel Angus
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Colonel Angus » Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:38 pm

RedBirds2011 wrote:
jim-green wrote:
Mr. Pancakes wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote: I think a much better system would be making it harder to get loans rather than closing schools.

FWIW, poor people aren't as smart as people who aren't poor, so I think this makes sense.
I worked on this today at the office, and here is what I think the number of law schools should be capped at.
\int \frac{dx}{1+ax}=\frac{1}{a}\ln(1+ax)+C \ , where x = number of law jobs, a = total outstanding loans, and C = US news rank – 47.





The answer is clearly...42.


Yeah, but what's the question?

User avatar
Dr. Filth
Posts: 1158
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Dr. Filth » Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:38 pm

Tom Joad wrote:
Mr. Pancakes wrote:
laxbrah420 wrote:Natty consumption would be contingent on if we allowed Busch and Keystone to stay

keystone>busch light>natty.

Busch > Natty > Keystone

TCR

but of course PBR>all

edit: just read the 8th page :lol: internet bro fist

Excellent117
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:44 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Excellent117 » Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:41 pm

RedBirds2011 wrote:
jim-green wrote:
Mr. Pancakes wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote: I think a much better system would be making it harder to get loans rather than closing schools.

FWIW, poor people aren't as smart as people who aren't poor, so I think this makes sense.
I worked on this today at the office, and here is what I think the number of law schools should be capped at.
\int \frac{dx}{1+ax}=\frac{1}{a}\ln(1+ax)+C \ , where x = number of law jobs, a = total outstanding loans, and C = US news rank – 47.





The answer is clearly...42.

Image

User avatar
Broseidon
Posts: 2663
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:35 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Broseidon » Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:47 am

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:I don't support closing of law schools. Without TTT's I would not have had the opportunity to attend law school at all. Attending law school ended up being the best thing to ever happen in my life and I legit am grateful for my original school making it possible for me to attend and prove myself. I realize I am in the minority here but that is how I feel. My opinion is obviously biased because it all worked out for me in the end.

I think a much better system would be making it harder to get loans rather than closing schools.


Uhm, so instead of closing bad schools with bad prospects, you'd rather make it more difficult for people who barely get into great schools to afford it?

TBF, the widespread availability of loans is what caused the proliferation of shit schools in the first place.

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby alwayssunnyinfl » Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:53 am

Broseidon wrote:
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:I don't support closing of law schools. Without TTT's I would not have had the opportunity to attend law school at all. Attending law school ended up being the best thing to ever happen in my life and I legit am grateful for my original school making it possible for me to attend and prove myself. I realize I am in the minority here but that is how I feel. My opinion is obviously biased because it all worked out for me in the end.

I think a much better system would be making it harder to get loans rather than closing schools.


Uhm, so instead of closing bad schools with bad prospects, you'd rather make it more difficult for people who barely get into great schools to afford it?

TBF, the widespread availability of loans is what caused the proliferation of shit schools in the first place.

I guess it would depend on what he meant by "making it harder." If he means on the individual borrower, I think that would be unfair to cut out the main source of funding for non-wealthy students. But I do think that schools should be limited in how much loan funding they can receive per year, or being required to take a stake in the loan process by being required to take on some of the burden of defaulting loans.

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby alwayssunnyinfl » Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:57 am

flem wrote:8 pages and no limo liberal misguided bullshit about equal access to education? I am proud, bros.


Yeah, nothing helps underprivileged kids out of poverty more than life-crushing debt and no job prospects.

User avatar
Mr. Pancakes
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: Should the # of law schools be capped at 50 were it possible

Postby Mr. Pancakes » Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:06 am

flem wrote:8 pages and no limo liberal misguided bullshit about equal access to education? I am proud, bros.

education is for weeding out the tards.




Return to “Law School FAQ”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests