The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

(Please Ask Questions and Answer Questions)
User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby paratactical » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:56 am

IAFG wrote:
paratactical wrote:
IAFG wrote:
MysticalWheel wrote:To be considered on par by TLS standards, one must have around a 175 LSAT and a minimum of a 3.7 GPA. Where in the world are you getting 165+ and 3.5+ from? It's not like all of us are content to settle with going to Columbia or, God forbid, Chicago.

MW

you do realize 3.7 is now below median at most law schools, right? at the 14 law schools that matter, i mean.


14? Psh. 13, at best.

I dunno para, GULC students have their uses I am sure. employment law associate at strook maybe.


Maybe they could gun for DLA Piper or work on the Cooley advertising team. Maybe.

User avatar
IAFG
Posts: 6665
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby IAFG » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:58 am

paratactical wrote:
IAFG wrote:I dunno para, GULC students have their uses I am sure. employment law associate at strook maybe.


Maybe they could gun for DLA Piper or work on the Cooley advertising team. Maybe.

oh! doc review of course. until rayiner writes an algorithm to make them obsolete anyway.

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby paratactical » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:01 pm

.
Last edited by paratactical on Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
nealric
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby nealric » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:56 pm

I dunno para, GULC students have their uses I am sure. employment law associate at strook maybe.


Doubt they would hire you given that you are unable to spell their name correctly.

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby paratactical » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:57 pm

nealric wrote:
I dunno para, GULC students have their uses I am sure. employment law associate at strook maybe.


Doubt they would hire you given that you are unable to spell their name correctly.


Thankfully, she doesn't go to a shiTTTy school, so she's okay.

User avatar
MysticalWheel
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:23 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby MysticalWheel » Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:53 pm

IAFG wrote:
MysticalWheel wrote:To be considered on par by TLS standards, one must have around a 175 LSAT and a minimum of a 3.7 GPA. Where in the world are you getting 165+ and 3.5+ from? It's not like all of us are content to settle with going to Columbia or, God forbid, Chicago.

MW

you do realize 3.7 is now below median at most law schools, right? at the 14 law schools that matter, i mean.


You do realize what the word "minimum" means, do you not?

MW

User avatar
im_blue
Posts: 3276
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby im_blue » Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:18 pm

ITE it's HYS or GTFO

User avatar
MysticalWheel
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:23 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby MysticalWheel » Mon Nov 08, 2010 5:49 pm

im_blue wrote:ITE it's HYS or GTFO


Agreed. The real standard of TLS is judging others based on whether they attend or have attended HYS, with Stanford barely making the cut. If the answer is no, then why are you even going to law school?

MW

User avatar
Borhas
Posts: 4852
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby Borhas » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:22 pm

apollo13 wrote:Why is it that there's the norm here in TLS that one 0L's GPA must be 3.5+ and LSAT of 165+?
I mean I am above the listed requisites - but to suppose that If I weren't, I would've felt like a "retarted" fudgetard barb who follows after unachievable dreams just to waste some goddamn money on TTT schools that would just simply give me the JD title and nothing else. Does it make that much difference going to higher-ranked, elite schools...?


those two things correlate well with the ADD and OCD necessary for joining a message board about law schools

User avatar
James Bond
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby James Bond » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:29 pm

wolfpack-avvocato wrote:
JazzOne wrote:
Renzo wrote:Who was it that trolled the clown forum again? That was priceless.

One of the mods. SBL I think.

It was SBL. Easily one of the funniest things I have ever seen on the interwebz, definitely on TLS


Unless this is an inside joke, please please please give the link

User avatar
IAFG
Posts: 6665
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby IAFG » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:33 pm

James Bond wrote:
wolfpack-avvocato wrote:
JazzOne wrote:
Renzo wrote:Who was it that trolled the clown forum again? That was priceless.

One of the mods. SBL I think.

It was SBL. Easily one of the funniest things I have ever seen on the interwebz, definitely on TLS


Unless this is an inside joke, please please please give the link

SBL found a clown message board, TLS attacked w/ parodies of ourselves (someone who was not me came in with "IAFarmClown") all the threads we started (chance me, etc) were deleted.

User avatar
20160810
Posts: 19648
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby 20160810 » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:03 pm

JazzOne wrote:
apollo13 wrote:Why is it that there's the norm here in TLS that one 0L's GPA must be 3.5+ and LSAT of 165+?

This isn't the fucking clown forum.

First rule of Fight Club, boss... :evil:

User avatar
JazzOne
Posts: 2938
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby JazzOne » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:04 pm

James Bond wrote:
wolfpack-avvocato wrote:
JazzOne wrote:
Renzo wrote:Who was it that trolled the clown forum again? That was priceless.

One of the mods. SBL I think.

It was SBL. Easily one of the funniest things I have ever seen on the interwebz, definitely on TLS


Unless this is an inside joke, please please please give the link

It was truly epic. Best moment on TLS since I've been around. SBL got in trouble and everything. lolololololol

As you can imagine, most of the flames on the clown forum had sexual overtones.

Renzo
Posts: 4265
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby Renzo » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:56 pm

JazzOne wrote:It was truly epic. Best moment on TLS since I've been around. SBL got in trouble and everything. lolololololol

As you can imagine, most of the flames on the clown forum had sexual overtones.

And the clowns got so mad they put their whole forum behind a signup-wall.

User avatar
JazzOne
Posts: 2938
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby JazzOne » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:59 pm

Renzo wrote:
JazzOne wrote:It was truly epic. Best moment on TLS since I've been around. SBL got in trouble and everything. lolololololol

As you can imagine, most of the flames on the clown forum had sexual overtones.

And the clowns got so mad they put their whole forum behind a signup-wall.

What did you expect? BigTop is a lot more prestigious than BigLaw.

whymeohgodno
Posts: 2508
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby whymeohgodno » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:02 am

Clowns are scary.

User avatar
sgtgrumbles
Posts: 653
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:46 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby sgtgrumbles » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:02 pm

JazzOne wrote:
Renzo wrote:
JazzOne wrote:It was truly epic. Best moment on TLS since I've been around. SBL got in trouble and everything. lolololololol

As you can imagine, most of the flames on the clown forum had sexual overtones.

And the clowns got so mad they put their whole forum behind a signup-wall.

What did you expect? BigTop is a lot more prestigious than BigLaw.

Well played, sir.

insurgent
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:35 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby insurgent » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:09 pm

most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though. :wink:

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby paratactical » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:13 pm

insurgent wrote:most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though. :wink:


Do you play hockey, rulser?

User avatar
Ragged
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby Ragged » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:33 pm

From the time I've been here the standard has become alot harsher. It used to be T14 or bust. Then T6 or bust. Now its more like HYS or bust, CCN are the first losers and then the rest. If nothing else TLS certainly provides motivation to excell, since nothing can be as motivating a factor as what people on teh internet think of you.

User avatar
IAFG
Posts: 6665
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby IAFG » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:54 pm

Ragged wrote:From the time I've been here the standard has become alot harsher. It used to be T14 or bust. Then T6 or bust. Now its more like HYS or bust, CCN are the first losers and then the rest. If nothing else TLS certainly provides motivation to excell, since nothing can be as motivating a factor aswhat people on teh internet think of you the chest-pain-inducing fear of striking out at OCI.

User avatar
20160810
Posts: 19648
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby 20160810 » Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:08 pm

insurgent wrote:most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though. :wink:

Even for the internet, this is pretty unhealthy.

Banned. Seek therapy.

User avatar
Unitas
Posts: 1387
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby Unitas » Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:33 pm

SBL wrote:
insurgent wrote:most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though. :wink:

Even for the internet, this is pretty unhealthy.

Banned. Seek therapy.


I am very afraid to google "small clitoral hoods" to find out if that is a bad or good thing..... Someone enlighten me?

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby paratactical » Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:35 pm

Unitas wrote:
SBL wrote:
insurgent wrote:most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though. :wink:

Even for the internet, this is pretty unhealthy.

Banned. Seek therapy.


I am very afraid to google "small clitoral hoods" to find out if that is a bad or good thing..... Someone enlighten me?


Meh. Mostly just makes it really hard to pierce.

User avatar
apollo13
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:47 am

Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS

Postby apollo13 » Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:40 pm

lol... I will see you guys at either Duke or Michigan, or can you?!




Return to “Law School FAQ”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests