Maybe they could gun for dla piper or work on the Cooley advertising team. Maybe.IAFG wrote:I dunno para, GULC students have their uses I am sure. employment law associate at strook maybe.paratactical wrote:14? Psh. 13, at best.IAFG wrote:you do realize 3.7 is now below median at most law schools, right? at the 14 law schools that matter, i mean.MysticalWheel wrote:To be considered on par by TLS standards, one must have around a 175 LSAT and a minimum of a 3.7 GPA. Where in the world are you getting 165+ and 3.5+ from? It's not like all of us are content to settle with going to Columbia or, God forbid, Chicago.
MW
The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS Forum
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
oh! doc review of course. until rayiner writes an algorithm to make them obsolete anyway.paratactical wrote:Maybe they could gun for DLA Piper or work on the Cooley advertising team. Maybe.IAFG wrote: I dunno para, GULC students have their uses I am sure. employment law associate at strook maybe.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
.
Last edited by paratactical on Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- nealric
- Posts: 4279
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Doubt they would hire you given that you are unable to spell their name correctly.I dunno para, GULC students have their uses I am sure. employment law associate at strook maybe.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Thankfully, she doesn't go to a shiTTTy school, so she's okay.nealric wrote:Doubt they would hire you given that you are unable to spell their name correctly.I dunno para, GULC students have their uses I am sure. employment law associate at strook maybe.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MysticalWheel
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:23 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
You do realize what the word "minimum" means, do you not?IAFG wrote:you do realize 3.7 is now below median at most law schools, right? at the 14 law schools that matter, i mean.MysticalWheel wrote:To be considered on par by TLS standards, one must have around a 175 LSAT and a minimum of a 3.7 GPA. Where in the world are you getting 165+ and 3.5+ from? It's not like all of us are content to settle with going to Columbia or, God forbid, Chicago.
MW
MW
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
ITE it's HYS or GTFO
- MysticalWheel
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:23 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Agreed. The real standard of TLS is judging others based on whether they attend or have attended HYS, with Stanford barely making the cut. If the answer is no, then why are you even going to law school?im_blue wrote:ITE it's HYS or GTFO
MW
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
those two things correlate well with the ADD and OCD necessary for joining a message board about law schoolsapollo13 wrote:Why is it that there's the norm here in TLS that one 0L's GPA must be 3.5+ and LSAT of 165+?
I mean I am above the listed requisites - but to suppose that If I weren't, I would've felt like a "retarted" fudgetard barb who follows after unachievable dreams just to waste some goddamn money on TTT schools that would just simply give me the JD title and nothing else. Does it make that much difference going to higher-ranked, elite schools...?
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- James Bond
- Posts: 2344
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Unless this is an inside joke, please please please give the linkwolfpack-avvocato wrote:It was SBL. Easily one of the funniest things I have ever seen on the interwebz, definitely on TLSJazzOne wrote:One of the mods. SBL I think.Renzo wrote: Who was it that trolled the clown forum again? That was priceless.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
SBL found a clown message board, TLS attacked w/ parodies of ourselves (someone who was not me came in with "IAFarmClown") all the threads we started (chance me, etc) were deleted.James Bond wrote:Unless this is an inside joke, please please please give the linkwolfpack-avvocato wrote:It was SBL. Easily one of the funniest things I have ever seen on the interwebz, definitely on TLSJazzOne wrote:One of the mods. SBL I think.Renzo wrote: Who was it that trolled the clown forum again? That was priceless.
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
First rule of Fight Club, boss...JazzOne wrote:This isn't the fucking clown forum.apollo13 wrote:Why is it that there's the norm here in TLS that one 0L's GPA must be 3.5+ and LSAT of 165+?
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
It was truly epic. Best moment on TLS since I've been around. SBL got in trouble and everything. lololololololJames Bond wrote:Unless this is an inside joke, please please please give the linkwolfpack-avvocato wrote:It was SBL. Easily one of the funniest things I have ever seen on the interwebz, definitely on TLSJazzOne wrote:One of the mods. SBL I think.Renzo wrote: Who was it that trolled the clown forum again? That was priceless.
As you can imagine, most of the flames on the clown forum had sexual overtones.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
And the clowns got so mad they put their whole forum behind a signup-wall.JazzOne wrote: It was truly epic. Best moment on TLS since I've been around. SBL got in trouble and everything. lolololololol
As you can imagine, most of the flames on the clown forum had sexual overtones.
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
What did you expect? BigTop is a lot more prestigious than BigLaw.Renzo wrote:And the clowns got so mad they put their whole forum behind a signup-wall.JazzOne wrote: It was truly epic. Best moment on TLS since I've been around. SBL got in trouble and everything. lolololololol
As you can imagine, most of the flames on the clown forum had sexual overtones.
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Clowns are scary.
- sgtgrumbles
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:46 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Well played, sir.JazzOne wrote:What did you expect? BigTop is a lot more prestigious than BigLaw.Renzo wrote:And the clowns got so mad they put their whole forum behind a signup-wall.JazzOne wrote: It was truly epic. Best moment on TLS since I've been around. SBL got in trouble and everything. lolololololol
As you can imagine, most of the flames on the clown forum had sexual overtones.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Do you play hockey, rulser?insurgent wrote:most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though.
- Ragged
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
From the time I've been here the standard has become alot harsher. It used to be T14 or bust. Then T6 or bust. Now its more like HYS or bust, CCN are the first losers and then the rest. If nothing else TLS certainly provides motivation to excell, since nothing can be as motivating a factor as what people on teh internet think of you.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Ragged wrote:From the time I've been here the standard has become alot harsher. It used to be T14 or bust. Then T6 or bust. Now its more like HYS or bust, CCN are the first losers and then the rest. If nothing else TLS certainly provides motivation to excell, since nothing can be as motivating a factor aswhat people on teh internet think of youthe chest-pain-inducing fear of striking out at OCI.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Even for the internet, this is pretty unhealthy.insurgent wrote:most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though.
Banned. Seek therapy.
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
I am very afraid to google "small clitoral hoods" to find out if that is a bad or good thing..... Someone enlighten me?SBL wrote:Even for the internet, this is pretty unhealthy.insurgent wrote:most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though.
Banned. Seek therapy.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
Meh. Mostly just makes it really hard to pierce.Unitas wrote:I am very afraid to google "small clitoral hoods" to find out if that is a bad or good thing..... Someone enlighten me?SBL wrote:Even for the internet, this is pretty unhealthy.insurgent wrote:most of these guys/girls don't get laid much, that's why. small weeners/clitoral hoods lead people to overcompensate in other areas...notice they all have dreams of getting biglaw jobs, T14 schools...dickweeds and cuntrags. I think if I met a person from TLS in real life I'd take a crowbar to 'em after a few minutes of conversation. It would be a novelty rubber crowbar, though.
Banned. Seek therapy.
- apollo13
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:47 am
Re: The FREAKISH NORM IN TLS
lol... I will see you guys at either Duke or Michigan, or can you?!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login