.

(Please Ask Questions and Answer Questions)
User avatar
Cupidity
Posts: 2214
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:21 pm

Re: .

Postby Cupidity » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:37 am

Halibut6 wrote:
holydonkey wrote:Sorry, a libertarian is not considered URM.


That's unfortunate - I could use a boost.


I heard it is in the UC system

User avatar
holydonkey
Posts: 1184
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: .

Postby holydonkey » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:38 am

Halibut6 wrote:
holydonkey wrote:Sorry, a libertarian is not considered URM.


That's unfortunate - I could use a boost.


Just follow texlawtex's advice and you're golden for Cornell. Not sure about the rest of the T14.

keemos
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:22 pm

Re: .

Postby keemos » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:44 am

holydonkey wrote:Sorry, a libertarian is not considered URM.



What about "closet" libertarian?



edit: that came out bad. I am a libertarian but afraid to admit it...I guess I just did
Last edited by keemos on Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Zapatero
Posts: 517
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:14 pm

Re: .

Postby Zapatero » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:45 am

Honestly, if you don't know the difference between "to" and "too," you're probably not cut out for law school.

User avatar
holydonkey
Posts: 1184
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: .

Postby holydonkey » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:49 am

you should buy them all except "planet law school". read "getting to maybe" once during the summer and once during your first semester in 1L.

User avatar
Ragged
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: .

Postby Ragged » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:51 am

This thread had 0 responses and a blank OP 30 minutes ago... now its 2 pages long... wtf did I miss?

User avatar
Cupidity
Posts: 2214
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:21 pm

Re: .

Postby Cupidity » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:54 am

Ragged wrote:This thread had 0 responses and a blank OP 30 minutes ago... now its 2 pages long... wtf did I miss?


FLAME!!!!

User avatar
windycity
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:58 pm

Re: .

Postby windycity » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:56 am

BIGLAW.

User avatar
holydonkey
Posts: 1184
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: .

Postby holydonkey » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:57 am

Ragged wrote:This thread had 0 responses and a blank OP 30 minutes ago... now its 2 pages long... wtf did I miss?


Don't listen to the advice of 0Ls, nothing they say has any value. I am a 0L.

keemos
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:22 pm

Re: .

Postby keemos » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:59 am

Ragged wrote:This thread had 0 responses and a blank OP 30 minutes ago... now its 2 pages long... wtf did I miss?



what could you possibly be doing for 30 minutes instead of keeping up with this amazing thread?

User avatar
Zapatero
Posts: 517
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:14 pm

Re: .

Postby Zapatero » Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:00 am

No offense, OP, but is English your first language?

User avatar
Cupidity
Posts: 2214
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:21 pm

Re: .

Postby Cupidity » Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:08 am

ccs1702 wrote:No offense, OP, but is English your first language?


Oh c'mon, don't turn this into another Affirmative Action Thread.

keemos
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:22 pm

Re: .

Postby keemos » Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:11 am

OP,

YOU CAN"T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

User avatar
TTTennis
Posts: 346
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:12 pm

Re: .

Postby TTTennis » Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:25 am

My cousin from Valpo got BigLaw and he wasn't even top 30% of his class. Don't listen to these tls elitists, chase your dreams.

User avatar
Doritos
Posts: 1232
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:24 pm

Re: .

Postby Doritos » Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:35 am

This thread is sooooooooooo.......

--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
$1.99
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am

Re: .

Postby $1.99 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:46 am

o doyle rules

User avatar
reasonabledoubt
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm

Re: .

Postby reasonabledoubt » Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:57 am

Mormons like options, when it comes to law school, you can't enter more than one.

User avatar
TTTennis
Posts: 346
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:12 pm

Re: .

Postby TTTennis » Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:59 am

reasonabledoubt wrote:Mormons like options, when it comes to law school, you can't enter more than one.


Blatant anti-BYU trolling

User avatar
Chicklets
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:14 am

Re: .

Postby Chicklets » Mon Feb 15, 2010 2:59 am

An extra large blue envelope.

User avatar
reasonabledoubt
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm

Re: .

Postby reasonabledoubt » Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:00 am

Chicklets wrote:An extra large blue envelope.


with a small blue pill.

User avatar
$1.99
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am

Re: .

Postby $1.99 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:02 am

PLEASE LOVE ME JR!!!!!

keemos
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:22 pm

Re: .

Postby keemos » Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:02 am

sorry, forgot to post my stats....179, 3.99 at HYP. I got waitlisted at BU but it must have been a YP so you should be good with your 169/3.69

User avatar
holydonkey
Posts: 1184
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: .

Postby holydonkey » Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:13 am

keemos wrote:sorry, forgot to post my stats....179, 3.99 at HYP. I got waitlisted at BU but it must have been a YP so you should be good with your 169/3.69


If you're applying for the first time with numbers like that, ED to UVA. If you're transferring, ED to Chicago. Everyone must ED whether it be in this life or the next, might as well get it over with now.

Waitlist from BU is obviously YP. Don't listen to the posters saying that your violent criminal record and infamous wall street corruption put you on the waitlist. Those are great softs.

User avatar
windycity
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:58 pm

Re: .

Postby windycity » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:05 am

keemos wrote:sorry, forgot to post my stats....179, 3.99 at HYP. I got waitlisted at BU but it must have been a YP so you should be good with your 169/3.69


Retake.

User avatar
pinkzeppelin
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: .

Postby pinkzeppelin » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:21 am

texlawtex wrote:.

Have you thought about retaking the LSAT? Get T14 not TTT




Return to “Law School FAQ”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest