We're A1L mad here - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [New Pole]

(housing, friendships, future exams, all things 2020)

What Classes Do You Have This Semester?

Ks
64
16%
Crim
52
13%
Civ Pro
81
20%
Torts
58
15%
Property
38
10%
Con Law
20
5%
LRW
84
21%
 
Total votes: 397

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby Hennessy » Tue May 23, 2017 11:12 am

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Guys, I just found out I am also facing allegations of fathering a love child with Rielle Hunter (I'm destined for Carolina politics) and am therefore fine with taking the L on this one. Vote with gusto


i know someone else has mentioned this, but your avatar is one of the funniest moments in that shows history

thatblondegirl

Bronze
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:47 am

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [NOW UNDER MARSHAL LAW]

Postby thatblondegirl » Tue May 23, 2017 12:43 pm

This was the most difficult voting decision to date.

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [NOW UNDER MARSHAL LAW]

Postby chandhi » Tue May 23, 2017 12:44 pm

thatblondegirl wrote:This was the most difficult voting decision to date.

I still haven't voted :oops:

User avatar
ashrice13

Gold
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [NOW UNDER MARSHAL LAW]

Postby ashrice13 » Tue May 23, 2017 2:28 pm

chandhi wrote:
thatblondegirl wrote:This was the most difficult voting decision to date.

I still haven't voted :oops:

I just did within the last hour. I will plead the 5th if asked to reveal who I voted for though

ldlestrange

Bronze
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:50 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [NOW UNDER MARSHAL LAW]

Postby ldlestrange » Tue May 23, 2017 3:08 pm

chandhi wrote:
thatblondegirl wrote:This was the most difficult voting decision to date.

I still haven't voted :oops:

Same, probably going to wait until the very last moment. :cry:

User avatar
tofuspeedstar

Platinum
Posts: 8119
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:54 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby tofuspeedstar » Wed May 24, 2017 1:41 pm

damn i don't even think i made it out of preliminary.

User avatar
amta

Platinum
Posts: 9459
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby amta » Wed May 24, 2017 4:28 pm

Congrats to pozzo on his 2 rd. win streak and a finals berth!

Image

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8047
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby Mikey » Wed May 24, 2017 4:56 pm

I feel like no matter who is going up against someone else, it's still hard to choose.

:roll:

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby chandhi » Wed May 24, 2017 4:58 pm

...why is Sybill the only name crossed off on the bracket?

User avatar
KateMcKitten

Bronze
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:07 am

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby KateMcKitten » Wed May 24, 2017 5:00 pm

chandhi wrote:...why is Sybill the only name crossed off on the bracket?

I'm wondering the same thing. She's, like, still around, right?

User avatar
Stephylynette

Bronze
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 2:04 am

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby Stephylynette » Wed May 24, 2017 5:44 pm

KateMcKitten wrote:
chandhi wrote:...why is Sybill the only name crossed off on the bracket?

I'm wondering the same thing. She's, like, still around, right?

Also curious. Lol

User avatar
amta

Platinum
Posts: 9459
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby amta » Wed May 24, 2017 6:04 pm

because sybill lost and i like sybill less than the rest of you.

User avatar
guynourmin

Gold
Posts: 3426
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:42 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby guynourmin » Wed May 24, 2017 6:54 pm

amta wrote:because sybill lost and i like sybill less than the rest of you.

Figured you'd just say you got lazy. This is a much better/funnier answer. +1

User avatar
Stephylynette

Bronze
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 2:04 am

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby Stephylynette » Wed May 24, 2017 8:32 pm

amta wrote:because sybill lost and i like sybill less than the rest of you.

:roll:

User avatar
KateMcKitten

Bronze
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:07 am

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby KateMcKitten » Thu May 25, 2017 10:36 am

Stephylynette wrote:
amta wrote:because sybill lost and i like sybill less than the rest of you.

:roll:

Evil losers?

User avatar
thatlawlkid

Gold
Posts: 2223
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:06 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby thatlawlkid » Thu May 25, 2017 11:31 am

This is the hardest choice to make. might abstain.

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby chandhi » Thu May 25, 2017 7:09 pm

where is rigo

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby chargers21 » Thu May 25, 2017 7:28 pm

chandhi wrote:where is rigo

Per Rigo, summer hiatus

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby chandhi » Thu May 25, 2017 7:33 pm

chargers21 wrote:
chandhi wrote:where is rigo

Per Rigo, summer hiatus

he disappeared so suddenly

the most painful goodbyes are the ones that are never explained

User avatar
Shakawkaw

Gold
Posts: 4807
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby Shakawkaw » Fri May 26, 2017 10:14 am

Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8047
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby Mikey » Fri May 26, 2017 10:18 am

Shakawkaw wrote:Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

where does he stand on the abolishment of the 3x LSAT in 2 years rule? is his opinion positive, negative, neutral? pls

User avatar
dannyswo

Gold
Posts: 3776
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 4:27 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby dannyswo » Fri May 26, 2017 10:32 am

7 more work days....

User avatar
Shakawkaw

Gold
Posts: 4807
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby Shakawkaw » Fri May 26, 2017 10:33 am

Mikey wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

where does he stand on the abolishment of the 3x LSAT in 2 years rule? is his opinion positive, negative, neutral? pls

I think that Rigo would have mixed feelings on the issue. Firstly, I think he would say this is a positive change for applicants that crash and burn on a take (due to test day anxiety, illness, or some other unforeseen circumstance), especially if it was their last take. This allows applicants to cancel a bad take, and not worry about it being their last one. Secondly, I do believe that he would see this as a detriment to those who take the exam before they are ready and those who might take it 8 times in 2 years. However, I do ultimately think that Rigo would see the 3x in 2 years as overly paternalistic, and the abolishment of the rule as a positive, as it allows applicants more latitude with their takes, and how efficient they want to be, without the looming deadline weighing over their heads.

User avatar
guynourmin

Gold
Posts: 3426
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:42 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby guynourmin » Fri May 26, 2017 10:40 am

Shakawkaw wrote:
Mikey wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

where does he stand on the abolishment of the 3x LSAT in 2 years rule? is his opinion positive, negative, neutral? pls

I think that Rigo would have mixed feelings on the issue. Firstly, I think he would say this is a positive change for applicants that crash and burn on a take (due to test day anxiety, illness, or some other unforeseen circumstance), especially if it was their last take. This allows applicants to cancel a bad take, and not worry about it being their last one. Secondly, I do believe that he would see this as a detriment to those who take the exam before they are ready and those who might take it 8 times in 2 years. However, I do ultimately think that Rigo would see the 3x in 2 years as overly paternalistic, and the abolishment of the rule as a positive, as it allows applicants more latitude with their takes, and how efficient they want to be, without the looming deadline weighing over their heads.

Why do you have your own PR specialist when you're obviously so good at it yourself?

User avatar
Shakawkaw

Gold
Posts: 4807
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: Down the rabbit h0Le - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [WE ARE MARTIAL]

Postby Shakawkaw » Fri May 26, 2017 10:46 am

guybourdin wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:
Mikey wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

where does he stand on the abolishment of the 3x LSAT in 2 years rule? is his opinion positive, negative, neutral? pls

I think that Rigo would have mixed feelings on the issue. Firstly, I think he would say this is a positive change for applicants that crash and burn on a take (due to test day anxiety, illness, or some other unforeseen circumstance), especially if it was their last take. This allows applicants to cancel a bad take, and not worry about it being their last one. Secondly, I do believe that he would see this as a detriment to those who take the exam before they are ready and those who might take it 8 times in 2 years. However, I do ultimately think that Rigo would see the 3x in 2 years as overly paternalistic, and the abolishment of the rule as a positive, as it allows applicants more latitude with their takes, and how efficient they want to be, without the looming deadline weighing over their heads.

Why do you have your own PR specialist when you're obviously so good at it yourself?

Please refer all inquiries to Kronk and Co.



Return to “TLS Class of 2020 Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests