Not the Sharpest 2L in the Shed

(housing, friendships, future exams, all things 2018)

Is 2L better than 1L?

It's better
55
60%
It's worse
17
18%
I have lost all will to live and don't want to reflect on the past year.
14
15%
I am RCSOB and am technically a 3L now
6
7%
 
Total votes: 92

User avatar
Kinky John
Posts: 1117
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:52 am

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby Kinky John » Tue May 03, 2016 7:27 pm

so many rustled jimmies itt

Image

User avatar
OhBoyOhBortles
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:01 am

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby OhBoyOhBortles » Wed May 04, 2016 2:42 pm

How long after exams should I expect to regain my chill?

User avatar
Gray
Posts: 6242
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby Gray » Wed May 04, 2016 2:50 pm

OhBoyOhBortles wrote:How long after exams should I expect to regain my chill?

lol. like in 6 years when you are finally confident in your abilities as an associate

User avatar
PeanutsNJam
Posts: 4004
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby PeanutsNJam » Wed May 04, 2016 4:57 pm

I've run out of fucks to give for this last exam probably studied less than 8 hours total over the past 3 days just lol here we go

Made great progress in Witcher 3 though.

User avatar
Joscellin
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:40 am

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby Joscellin » Wed May 04, 2016 5:48 pm

Fuck property.

User avatar
DCfilterDC
Posts: 3186
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:55 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby DCfilterDC » Wed May 04, 2016 7:23 pm

Joscellin wrote:Fuck property.

User avatar
Kinky John
Posts: 1117
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:52 am

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby Kinky John » Wed May 04, 2016 7:30 pm

Fuck the bourgeoisie

User avatar
Big Red
Posts: 3128
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:29 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby Big Red » Wed May 04, 2016 8:56 pm

Gray wrote:
OhBoyOhBortles wrote:How long after exams should I expect to regain my chill?

lol. like in 6 years when you are finally confident in your abilities as an associate


pretty sure I left my chill at the door when I walked into my first LSAT :lol:

BNA
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:44 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby BNA » Wed May 04, 2016 9:07 pm

DCfilterDC wrote:
Joscellin wrote:Fuck property.


I am terrified of property. Future interests are about to literally wreck my life.

User avatar
kellyfrost
Posts: 2793
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 3:58 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby kellyfrost » Wed May 04, 2016 9:19 pm

BNA wrote:
DCfilterDC wrote:
Joscellin wrote:Fuck property.


I am terrified of property. Future interests are about to literally wreck my life.


O gives to his wife, A, for life, and then then to our children.

BNA
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:44 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby BNA » Wed May 04, 2016 10:03 pm

kellyfrost wrote:
BNA wrote:
DCfilterDC wrote:
Joscellin wrote:Fuck property.


I am terrified of property. Future interests are about to literally wreck my life.


O gives to his wife, A, for life, and then then to our children.


Impossible... right? I have no idea. Maybe Trump will make my life great again next year.

User avatar
PeanutsNJam
Posts: 4004
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby PeanutsNJam » Wed May 04, 2016 10:04 pm

To my daughter A for life as long as A does not marry, then to B and his children and his brother and his barber and their heirs, but if C graduates law school before 2050, to C and his heirs so long as he does not go over 5,000 posts on TLS.

ISSUE SPOT BITCH

not an actual fact pattern

User avatar
kellyfrost
Posts: 2793
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 3:58 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby kellyfrost » Wed May 04, 2016 10:37 pm

BNA wrote:
kellyfrost wrote:
BNA wrote:
DCfilterDC wrote:
Joscellin wrote:Fuck property.


I am terrified of property. Future interests are about to literally wreck my life.


O gives to his wife, A, for life, and then then to our children.


Impossible... right? I have no idea. Maybe Trump will make my life great again next year.


No, the children have a vested remainder subject to open. I think that's the correct verbiage.

After the bar exam, you'll never use what you learn in "Property" in practice or your own life. People don't "give" property like this anymore. It's either done through a will generated on LegalZoom.com or an intervivos transaction with totally different language.

User avatar
PeanutsNJam
Posts: 4004
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby PeanutsNJam » Wed May 04, 2016 10:46 pm

WITNESSETH

User avatar
Gray
Posts: 6242
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby Gray » Wed May 04, 2016 11:16 pm

I love our Prof for skipping future interests. Still going to fail the exam but at least I don't have to study that crap.

BNA
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:44 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby BNA » Wed May 04, 2016 11:18 pm

kellyfrost wrote:
BNA wrote:
kellyfrost wrote:
BNA wrote:
DCfilterDC wrote:
Joscellin wrote:Fuck property.


I am terrified of property. Future interests are about to literally wreck my life.


O gives to his wife, A, for life, and then then to our children.


Impossible... right? I have no idea. Maybe Trump will make my life great again next year.


No, the children have a vested remainder subject to open. I think that's the correct verbiage.

After the bar exam, you'll never use what you learn in "Property" in practice or your own life. People don't "give" property like this anymore. It's either done through a will generated on LegalZoom.com or an intervivos transaction with totally different language.


Thought you can't devise to spouse bc tenants in entirety. Either that or it's unnecessary? Apologes for thread hijack

BNA
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:44 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby BNA » Wed May 04, 2016 11:19 pm

Gray wrote:I love our Prof for skipping future interests. Still going to fail the exam but at least I don't have to study that crap.


Unbelievable. I'd cut off half a toe to be in your shoes.

User avatar
KunAgnis
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:41 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby KunAgnis » Wed May 04, 2016 11:31 pm

BNA wrote:
Gray wrote:I love our Prof for skipping future interests. Still going to fail the exam but at least I don't have to study that crap.


Unbelievable. I'd cut off half a toe to be in your shoes.


In my situation I'm too jaded-I figure it's the same losing points over one topic or another

kingpin101
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby kingpin101 » Wed May 04, 2016 11:42 pm

Fuck you RAP.

acr
Posts: 574
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:14 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby acr » Wed May 04, 2016 11:44 pm

my prof took rule against perpetuities off our exam because "it's too hard" lol

User avatar
PeanutsNJam
Posts: 4004
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby PeanutsNJam » Thu May 05, 2016 12:10 am

Gray wrote:I love our Prof for skipping future interests. Still going to fail the exam but at least I don't have to study that crap.


Recording Acts?

Future interests are on the bar iirc so it's not all bad having to learn it.

BNA
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:44 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby BNA » Thu May 05, 2016 12:19 am

PeanutsNJam wrote:
Gray wrote:I love our Prof for skipping future interests. Still going to fail the exam but at least I don't have to study that crap.


Recording Acts?

Future interests are on the bar iirc so it's not all bad having to learn it.


My brain is going to immediately discard every fragment of estates and interests the second I click "finished" on that exam. I'm sure of it. Thought I would coast through and pick this up at the end like I did last semester - huge mistake. I'm going to start a 0L "don't neglect property" thread.

User avatar
Joscellin
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:40 am

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby Joscellin » Thu May 05, 2016 12:37 am

acr wrote:my prof took rule against perpetuities off our exam because "it's too hard" lol


Think we're in the same class.

That shit pissed me off, too. We spend a fucking week on it, figure it out, then he takes it off the exam? With how much shit we had to skip, that was such a massive fucking waste of time and effort.

acr
Posts: 574
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:14 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby acr » Thu May 05, 2016 12:41 am

Joscellin wrote:
acr wrote:my prof took rule against perpetuities off our exam because "it's too hard" lol


Think we're in the same class.

That shit pissed me off, too. We spend a fucking week on it, figure it out, then he takes it off the exam? With how much shit we had to skip, that was such a massive fucking waste of time and effort.


the fucking remainders week was a nightmare too

User avatar
kellyfrost
Posts: 2793
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 3:58 pm

Re: WE HAVE NO CH1LL

Postby kellyfrost » Thu May 05, 2016 7:59 am

BNA wrote:
kellyfrost wrote:
BNA wrote:
kellyfrost wrote:
BNA wrote:
DCfilterDC wrote:
Joscellin wrote:Fuck property.


I am terrified of property. Future interests are about to literally wreck my life.


O gives to his wife, A, for life, and then then to our children.


Impossible... right? I have no idea. Maybe Trump will make my life great again next year.


No, the children have a vested remainder subject to open. I think that's the correct verbiage.

After the bar exam, you'll never use what you learn in "Property" in practice or your own life. People don't "give" property like this anymore. It's either done through a will generated on LegalZoom.com or an intervivos transaction with totally different language.


Thought you can't devise to spouse bc tenants in entirety. Either that or it's unnecessary? Apologes for thread hijack


I don't think tenancy in entirety comes into play here. Since it wasn't mentioned in the facts, I wouldn't assume it. God these future interests are bullshit.

Hopefully your professor doesn't test on the rule against perpetuities.




Return to “TLS Class of 2018 Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest