xylocarp wrote:Next poll will be least favorite class
unsweetened wrote: Is anyone still doing full case briefs anymore?
Companion Cube wrote:WokeUpInACar wrote:buckiguy_sucks wrote:Non 1Ls ITT:
I'm finding I have little problem with remembering rules but am basically not at all remembering which case they are from when the professor asks in class discussion. Is this something I will need to memorize for exams anyway so should just start? Obviously big cases international shoe etc are no problem but the smaller points I pretty much never remember the case
You're fine. 95% of professors don't give a shit about citing case names on exams. Do confirm that your prof isn't one of the 5% though.
For my 1L the reverse was true. Only 1 professor explicitly said that they didn't give points for citing cases. For all others it was absolutely required to make a good grade. Btw I'm sure this is understood here, but you don't get (many) points for saying rule X, from case Y. You get points for reasoning by analogy: this set of facts is [like/different from] that case because XYZ. Therefore the court should rule ____
Hikkomorist wrote:legit wrote:You swiped right on a guy who turns out to be an associate...remove?
(Asking for a friend.)
But they keep harping on networking.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest