. Forum

MurdockLLP · Post by **MurdockLLP** » Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:55 pm

Just found out I wrote on to Law Review. Super stoked.

GreenEggs · Post by **GreenEggs** » Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:58 pm

MurdockLLP wrote:Just found out I wrote on to Law Review. Super stoked.

Congrats dude

MurdockLLP · Post by **MurdockLLP** » Sun Jun 26, 2016 9:00 pm

DCfilterDC wrote:
MurdockLLP wrote:Just found out I wrote on to Law Review. Super stoked.
Congrats dude

Thanks man! Finally done with 1L (summer competitions are over). Feels good.

FuturePanhandler · Post by **FuturePanhandler** » Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:49 am

Found out I am top 10.5% today. What's the consensus on how to reflect your rank on your resume when you are that close to a cutoff? Do I just suck it up and put top 15%?

GreenEggs · Post by **GreenEggs** » Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:25 pm

FuturePanhandler wrote:Found out I am top 10.5% today. What's the consensus on how to reflect your rank on your resume when you are that close to a cutoff? Do I just suck it up and put top 15%?

Can you put 11/101 or w/e ?

PeanutsNJam · Post by **PeanutsNJam** » Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:38 pm

FuturePanhandler wrote:Found out I am top 10.5% today. What's the consensus on how to reflect your rank on your resume when you are that close to a cutoff? Do I just suck it up and put top 15%?

I believe you have to put the official designation. If your school tells you you rank, you can put that, but you have to use your school's official cutoffs. Or whatever appears on your transcript basically.

Dr. Nefario · Post by **Dr. Nefario** » Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:14 pm

PeanutsNJam wrote:
FuturePanhandler wrote:Found out I am top 10.5% today. What's the consensus on how to reflect your rank on your resume when you are that close to a cutoff? Do I just suck it up and put top 15%?
I believe you have to put the official designation. If your school tells you you rank, you can put that, but you have to use your school's official cutoffs. Or whatever appears on your transcript basically.

Our CDO advises if you're litrally that close to being better than you actually are, put

Blah Point Blah Blah, Top 15% of First-Year blah blah blah (Top 10% was blah point blah blah)

FuturePanhandler · Post by **FuturePanhandler** » Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:00 pm

DCfilterDC wrote:
FuturePanhandler wrote:Found out I am top 10.5% today. What's the consensus on how to reflect your rank on your resume when you are that close to a cutoff? Do I just suck it up and put top 15%?
Can you put 11/101 or w/e ?

As far as I know, I can put whatever I want. I figured the best think to do would be put x/x.

BVest · Post by **BVest** » Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:34 pm

Yeah, follow what your school guidelines are. Sometimes something like "GPA 3.724 (10% at 3.730)" is within those guidelines though.

leslieknope · Post by **leslieknope** » Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:49 pm

You could also just say "Ranked in the 10th percentile." Like the LSAT!

Hikikomorist · Post by **Hikikomorist** » Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:28 pm

Thread poll: more successful mass-mailing or swiping on Tinder?

Minnietron · Post by **Minnietron** » Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:12 pm

Hikikomorist wrote:Thread poll: more successful mass-mailing or swiping on Tinder?

What if you haven't done either?

Hikikomorist · Post by **Hikikomorist** » Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:28 pm

Minnietron wrote:
Hikikomorist wrote:Thread poll: more successful mass-mailing or swiping on Tinder?
What if you haven't done either?

People with happy lives don't need TLS polls.

Dr. Nefario · Post by **Dr. Nefario** » Fri Jul 01, 2016 9:51 pm

Hikikomorist wrote:
Minnietron wrote:
Hikikomorist wrote:Thread poll: more successful mass-mailing or swiping on Tinder?
What if you haven't done either?
People with happy lives don't need TLS polls.

New ad campaign: "Will swipe right for job", sponsored by below median 2Ls everywhere

Minnietron · Post by **Minnietron** » Sat Jul 09, 2016 8:51 am

I fear we started law school two-years too late. If we had just graduated, we could've hung a shingle and gotten in at the ground floor of Pokemon Go litigation.

MurdockLLP · Post by **MurdockLLP** » Sat Jul 09, 2016 6:04 pm

Minnietron wrote:I fear we started law school two-years too late. If we had just graduated, we could've hung a shingle and gotten in at the ground floor of Pokemon Go litigation.

So many conversion & trespass claims . . .

Hikikomorist · Post by **Hikikomorist** » Sat Jul 09, 2016 6:05 pm

Are participants monetizing this yet? To what degree?

Minnietron · Post by **Minnietron** » Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:18 pm

MurdockLLP wrote:
Minnietron wrote:I fear we started law school two-years too late. If we had just graduated, we could've hung a shingle and gotten in at the ground floor of Pokemon Go litigation.
So many conversion & trespass claims . . .

Negligence everywhere!

Hikikomorist wrote:Are participants monetizing this yet? To what degree?

The question is how you can monetize participants!

MurdockLLP · Post by **MurdockLLP** » Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:38 am

Mass mailing sucks.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:42 am

MurdockLLP wrote:Mass mailing sucks.

Targeted mailing is the play true mass mailing is too much effort

Auxilio · Post by **Auxilio** » Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:45 am

MurdockLLP wrote:Mass mailing sucks.

I managed to let myself off mass mailing too many firms until my OCI bid results come in. That's tomorrow and I can already feel that familiar hatred of procrastinating me.

MurdockLLP · Post by **MurdockLLP** » Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:03 am

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
MurdockLLP wrote:Mass mailing sucks.
Targeted mailing is the play true mass mailing is too much effort

Who/How are you targeting?

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:53 am

MurdockLLP wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:
MurdockLLP wrote:Mass mailing sucks.
Targeted mailing is the play true mass mailing is too much effort
Who/How are you targeting?

Firms I have networked with throughout the year mostly. Also firms with practice group in market I want

MurdockLLP · Post by **MurdockLLP** » Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:57 am

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
MurdockLLP wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:
MurdockLLP wrote:Mass mailing sucks.
Targeted mailing is the play true mass mailing is too much effort
Who/How are you targeting?
Firms I have networked with throughout the year mostly. Also firms with practice group in market I want

Any luck?

Dr. Nefario · Post by **Dr. Nefario** » Mon Jul 11, 2016 12:14 pm

MurdockLLP wrote:Mass mailing sucks.

debating hiring an assistant to continue mine

. Forum

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Register for access!

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Register now!

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Re: Done-L: it was one L of a year.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?