I read some Reddit posts, they bet on equitable remedies question relating to requesting injunctive relief from a statute that infringes a constitutional right. Could be equal protection or 1st Amendment.chrisokc wrote:I think the fact that remedies is listed before con law in the name of the question may have some significance. For example, in February 2019, Question 4 was identified as "evidence/civil procedure," but civ pro was just a very minor portion. If con law is just a very minor issue, the question would be what remedy would have a constitutional implication.2807 wrote:Old timer here.
Back in it for a friend taking this test.
Can anyone give some direction on Remedy/Con Law ?
I saw a few posts/concerns already, but wondering if anyone new has some advice on these two together?
You think this is a remedy that is unconcstutnoial ?
Or a constitutional remedy for an alleged government (or private) wrong? (ie: all this current immigration stuff, or funding for the wall ..?)
Or maybe like the bakery that refuses to make a cake for a protected class...?
Hmmm... yep.
Any thoughts?
thanks folks
Good luck to you all.
A MALE HUMAN ?? WHERE ARE YOU ol Buddy !?
Because damage remedy or other cause of action will inevitably include a third topic.