CBX July 2018 pass rates by school Forum

Discussions related to the bar exam are found in this forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
jptx

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:11 pm

Re: CBX July 2018 pass rates by school

Post by jptx » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:10 pm

JoeSeperac wrote:
anon sequitur wrote:A decrease in the overall gpa/LSAT of the population taking the test seems pretty significant, wouldn't you expect scores to go down when that happens? Especially if it's a sustained drop over 5+ years at his point?
Bar exam pass rates are tied to the MBE (e.g. if the MBE average for an administration goes up, the pass rates almost always go up) and MBE scores are correlated with LSAT scores. The 2013 Full-Time Law School Matriculants (who took the bar exam in 2016) had a 25th LSAT Percentile/75th LSAT Percentile average of 155.8. Meanwhile, the 2014 Full-Time Law School Matriculants (who took the bar exam in 2017) had a 25th LSAT Percentile/75th LSAT Percentile average of 155.6. This trend continued. The 2015 Full-Time Law School Matriculants (who take the bar exam in 2018) had a 25th LSAT Percentile/75th LSAT Percentile average of 155.4. The 2016 Full-Time Law School Matriculants (who take the bar exam in 2019) had a 25th LSAT Percentile/75th LSAT Percentile average of 154.2. If the Full-Time Law School Matriculants are becoming statistically less capable with each passing year, it is reasonable to presume that the bar pass rates will be lower. FYI, the LSAT percentiles for 2017 matriculants finally reversed their slide so I would expect 2020 pass rates to be better than 2019 pass rates.

To illustrate, below is a chart where I compare the CA pass rate over the past 20 years to the national mean MBE over the last 20 years and the LSAT Percentiles from 2010-2014 (to correspond with 2013-2017 pass rates).


This is pretty interesting. The issue relates to supply and demand. The California cut rate sets a limit and a higher bar than other states. The obvious effect of which is to limit the number of attorneys entering the market. Does performance on the Bar exam measure the qualities needed in a lawyer. Not really. It would be better to put a $100 bill on the floor to see what the proposed lawyer does. Does he pocket it, does he yell fire to clear the room then pocket it, does he try to find the real owner, or does he try to find the real owner but charge the real owner for his finder services . My point is integrity and the desire to truly help people is by far the most important trait for the profession, but not really measurable by test. Because we cannot measure "all things lawyer," the cut is made by measuring memorization skills, speed typing, and logic and analysis skills. In Texas about 80% of bar takers pass, but competition for good clients is fierce. I know a few competent (but not great) lawyers that charge clients (who can afford hirer rates) $300 a day (as opposed to per hour) because they need that business to feed their families. I cannot come close that rate and pay staff, rent and allow for pro bono services for those persons truly deserving of reduced/free rates. But I find myself competing with $300.00 a day lawyers for business. This may explain why LSAT scores are going down. The legal field is not a lucrative as it was years ago, especially in Texas, so highly intelligent and motivated persons choose a different career path. At this time, I am unaware of an experienced California attorney who will work for $300 a day. (Maybe if offered a full time job with guaranteed 5 days a week a few new attorneys may accept). This might change if the cut score is lowered.

FinallyPassedTheBar

Bronze
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:27 am

Re: CBX July 2018 pass rates by school

Post by FinallyPassedTheBar » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:34 pm

The best disinfectant is sunlight. The fact that the bar never releases the essays to those who passed is highly suspicious.

Nightcrawler

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:02 pm

Re: CBX July 2018 pass rates by school

Post by Nightcrawler » Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:18 am

FinallyPassedTheBar wrote:The best disinfectant is sunlight. The fact that the bar never releases the essays to those who passed is highly suspicious.

JoeSeperac

Moderator
Posts: 507
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:30 pm

Re: CBX July 2018 pass rates by school

Post by JoeSeperac » Sun Jan 13, 2019 5:31 pm

Nightcrawler wrote:It would be interesting to have access to scores and subscores of all candidates in the past few years and see how much Civ Pro, for example, is dragging the candidates down.
This was probably true between 2015-2016 when NCBE wouldn't release MBE subscrores, it was true in 2017 (from looking at F17 & J17 subscores, Civ Pro was the lowest scoring subject), but it is no longer true. In 2018, Civ Pro MBE questions were the 2nd or 3rd best scoring subject among examinees (if you are curious, Property was the worst scoring MBE subject). But the difference between the worst scoring and best scoring MBE subjects is maybe just one MBE question, so NCBE has definitely improved the parity between the MBE subjects.

Nightcrawler

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:02 pm

Re: CBX July 2018 pass rates by school

Post by Nightcrawler » Tue Jan 22, 2019 1:45 pm

JoeSeperac wrote:
Nightcrawler wrote:It would be interesting to have access to scores and subscores of all candidates in the past few years and see how much Civ Pro, for example, is dragging the candidates down.
This was probably true between 2015-2016 when NCBE wouldn't release MBE subscrores, it was true in 2017 (from looking at F17 & J17 subscores, Civ Pro was the lowest scoring subject), but it is no longer true. In 2018, Civ Pro MBE questions were the 2nd or 3rd best scoring subject among examinees (if you are curious, Property was the worst scoring MBE subject). But the difference between the worst scoring and best scoring MBE subjects is maybe just one MBE question, so NCBE has definitely improved the parity between the MBE subjects.
Is it because people got better at Civ Pro or because Real Property got much, much worse?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


JoeSeperac

Moderator
Posts: 507
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:30 pm

Re: CBX July 2018 pass rates by school

Post by JoeSeperac » Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:48 am

Nightcrawler wrote:Is it because people got better at Civ Pro or because Real Property got much, much worse?
For Civ Pro, my uneducated guess is that the reliability/validity of the questions improved. NCBE looks at post-exam results for each question to determine if it's psychometrically sound. For example, they expect a certain distribution of A, B, C, and D choices for each question. Lets say they have a question where almost no one chooses D. That question is not psychometrically sound and is going to get rewritten/improved or thrown out. So with each exam iteration, NCBE can do a better job of having psychometrically sound questions. For Real Property,I think it's because Real Property is the subject skipped most often by examinees, but who knows.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Bar Exam Prep and Discussion Forum”