nsv wrote:netrag wrote:jman77 wrote:nsv wrote:Did everyone address hearsay on the second question?
In the essays? Yup. I saw 2 hearsay within a hearsay issues. One was admissible (opponent party statement/admission) within a business record and the other inadmissible (I think statement of a belief -- also, it was irrelevant).
Also did this analysis, but I forgot about the CA specific rules, so I pretended they were the same after stating hearsay was exempt from Prop 8.
How did you come out on right to jury trial re: Civ Pro & proximate cause on the following q?
Fml...I totally just threw a few sentences in there on hearsay. Welp
You'll be fine. I wrote two sentences on motion to compel. I thought the remedies question was more difficult, but never learned remedies until earlier this month and was not expecting it to show up.