Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2015 1:13 pm
SpAcEmAn SpLiFF wrote:Plus the dude just has the most punchable face I've ever seen.
See also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tOakzcUx_A
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=244425
SpAcEmAn SpLiFF wrote:Plus the dude just has the most punchable face I've ever seen.
BarEssays at least is loading fast for me.gaagoots wrote:Anyone noticing a lag on bar websites? i.e. Adaptibar, Baressays? Every other site I have been clicking non-bar related during lunch hour is normal.
Since 12:30 my baressays is loading..tap tap tap 5 minutes later the progress bar is still trying to load.
a male human wrote:BarEssays at least is loading fast for me.gaagoots wrote:Anyone noticing a lag on bar websites? i.e. Adaptibar, Baressays? Every other site I have been clicking non-bar related during lunch hour is normal.
Since 12:30 my baressays is loading..tap tap tap 5 minutes later the progress bar is still trying to load.
There's that guy on YouTube; nothing is an "almost guaranteed" or pass rates would be way higher.smokeylarue wrote:Is there a site/blog or anyone that has predictions for this year's essay topics? Like what is likely and/or almost guaranteed to be one of the 6 essay topics.
redblueyellow wrote:There's that guy on YouTube; nothing is an "almost guaranteed" or pass rates would be way higher. Well, PR.smokeylarue wrote:Is there a site/blog or anyone that has predictions for this year's essay topics? Like what is likely and/or almost guaranteed to be one of the 6 essay topics.
There's that guy on YouTube; nothing is an "almost guaranteed" or pass rates would be way higher. Well, PR.smokeylarue wrote:Is there a site/blog or anyone that has predictions for this year's essay topics? Like what is likely and/or almost guaranteed to be one of the 6 essay topics.
Except that the MBE doesn't test on CA instructionsgaagoots wrote:I got a Barbri MBE wrong because it called a bull a domesticated animal and the owner was not responsible for injury to a hiker.
In California, at least the CACI jury instructions, a bull would be considered livestock--I had always thought that an owner of trespassing livestock is strictly liable for injuries or damages by that animal. This is bulls*it LOL.
redblueyellow wrote:Except that the MBE doesn't test on CA instructionsgaagoots wrote:I got a Barbri MBE wrong because it called a bull a domesticated animal and the owner was not responsible for injury to a hiker.
In California, at least the CACI jury instructions, a bull would be considered livestock--I had always thought that an owner of trespassing livestock is strictly liable for injuries or damages by that animal. This is bulls*it LOL.
I would've either picked C or D personally; this is under the assumption that "bull" as in the male species of domesticated livestock and not the crazy Spain bull-fighting bulls.
I definitely think that law schools make us waayyyyy overthink questions. I've been known to get it down to two answer choices and then pick the wrong one because I answered it like I would a law school essay (argue both sides--really hard).gaagoots wrote:redblueyellow wrote:Except that the MBE doesn't test on CA instructionsgaagoots wrote:I got a Barbri MBE wrong because it called a bull a domesticated animal and the owner was not responsible for injury to a hiker.
In California, at least the CACI jury instructions, a bull would be considered livestock--I had always thought that an owner of trespassing livestock is strictly liable for injuries or damages by that animal. This is bulls*it LOL.
I would've either picked C or D personally; this is under the assumption that "bull" as in the male species of domesticated livestock and not the crazy Spain bull-fighting bulls.
Thanks RBY--I just have to laugh at some of these questions and think 'bar law' not real law.
I think if you sign up for either Adaptibar or the Kaplan/PMBR Qbank, they do an additional MBE simulation.crumpetsandtea wrote:Are there other reliable sources for full practice MBE exams? I just took the BarBri one but I think it's the only full length mixed set they give us, and I'd like to do another one in a week or two so I can gauge my progress.
I don't know what the average passing score is, but it's hard to say since the MBE isn't a very big portion of the grade. You can do really well on the MBE and still fail. Check out this calculator, though (part of its formula is based on an estimate of the raw -> scale curve, so take it with a grain of salt):Charger wrote:I think if you sign up for either Adaptibar or the Kaplan/PMBR Qbank, they do an additional MBE simulation.crumpetsandtea wrote:Are there other reliable sources for full practice MBE exams? I just took the BarBri one but I think it's the only full length mixed set they give us, and I'd like to do another one in a week or two so I can gauge my progress.
In other news, does anyone know how to interpret the Barbri MBE simulation for CA? The notes said 126 raw (converted to a scaled 143) is the typical average for a passing MBE in "virtually every state." Since the CA bar is such a bitch, I've been wary of Barbri's claims that being above the national average is sufficient. Does anyone know what an average passing MBE score is in CA?
yeah, good case. thanks. I can hear Chemerinsky now: The court didn’t need to decide the level of scrutiny to be applied, Justice Kagan said, because Gilbert’s ordinance did not pass strict scrutiny, or intermediate scrutiny, or even the laugh test.a male human wrote:Just thought this article was somewhat relevant since it talks about content-based regulation of speech under the First Amendment:
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ ... ign_ordina
It might be an example that triggers your memory of a rule under pressure.
It would be historic to have biz again, since they've had it for 2 bar exams in a row already.horrorbusiness wrote:FWIW, the guy from barsecrets.com has made these predictions for the essays:
prof resp
con law
crim
evidence
business associations
community property mixed with wills & trusts
they're from this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=204&v=FnIUKgPtPfY
How accurate has this guy been in the past?LawIsPrettyCool wrote:It would be historic to have biz again, since they've had it for 2 bar exams in a row already.horrorbusiness wrote:FWIW, the guy from barsecrets.com has made these predictions for the essays:
prof resp
con law
crim
evidence
business associations
community property mixed with wills & trusts
they're from this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=204&v=FnIUKgPtPfY
Charger wrote:How accurate has this guy been in the past?LawIsPrettyCool wrote:It would be historic to have biz again, since they've had it for 2 bar exams in a row already.horrorbusiness wrote:FWIW, the guy from barsecrets.com has made these predictions for the essays:
prof resp
con law
crim
evidence
business associations
community property mixed with wills & trusts
they're from this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=204&v=FnIUKgPtPfY
PredictionsCalicakes wrote:Doesn't everyone always predict PR? For some reason, I thought it was mandated by the State Supreme court to be on the exam, however it wasn't in Feb 2015.
How can I make myself remember all these useless rules for Civ Pro? Its so boring, its going in one ear and out the other.
Thank you so much for your post. It will help me a lot during this montha male human wrote:PredictionsCalicakes wrote:Doesn't everyone always predict PR? For some reason, I thought it was mandated by the State Supreme court to be on the exam, however it wasn't in Feb 2015.
How can I make myself remember all these useless rules for Civ Pro? Its so boring, its going in one ear and out the other.
Yes, PR is practically a certainty. Remedies has appeared in the past 5 exams, so it's probably also worth paying attention to.
There's no reason to try to predict the subjects because it's all fair game. Use that time to instead look at another essay. I almost got killed because I followed the predictions and the one subject I was hoping wouldn't appear...of course...appeared.
Moreover, you can adjust your bearing on exam day instead of beforehand. For example, if you go into the exam feeling shaky on one subject, you can look at all three essay questions and rearrange them so that you do it last (or first so you can warm up for the subjects you're more confident about, will expand on this when we get closer to bar week).
Remembering useless rules
What you want to ensure is you can recall rather than merely recognize. You could nod proudly and say "oh, I know this rule" or "of course, it was so obvious" after you see the rule. Since that doesn't do jack, you're right that you should make yourself remember all these rules.
One way is to simply do essays. You are doing practice essays, right?
Do them closed book. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it's July now! Review your outlines beforehand if you must. If you couldn't state the rule, great! Do your best and check your answer (via model, sample, Bar Essays, etc.) to feel bad about how many you missed. Keep doing them, and you'll get a sense of which topics (i.e., issues and rules) appear more frequently. And the more you practice your recall, the better it will stay in your mind, the added benefit being that those frequent issues and rules are more likely to be tested on the actual thing anyway. (If you want a shortcut and see which issues appear more frequently, get a sub at BarIssues.com. Incidentally, I have a $20 off coupon for each of Bar Issues and Bar Essays--just ask).
However, you don't need to do full essays all the time. Once you know how the approach and rule application work for a subject, you can cut down on your essay practice by merely identifying the issues and writing out the rule, similar to how you'd outline on test day. This process of IR-ing and checking them should take, what, 20-30 minutes depending? Essentially you can now grind through those essays at double or triple the previous rate. I call this essay cooking, long story.
You should also repeat essays you've done already, particularly ones that aren't sticking as well. Scared that you will miss the issues again? Don't be a wuss. Who expects to remember everything after one exposure? Not me, I'm not Mike Ross.
Why not just rote memorize? That's fine too, but you should also know how to apply the rules instead of just knowing them in theory.
In sum, practice your recall if you want to make yourself remember all these useless rules. Note that this may appear like very obvious advice, but I think it's the answer.
- Full essays until you "get" the subject
- Cook the essays thereafter