July 2015 California Bar Exam

User avatar
soj
Posts: 7735
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby soj » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:07 am

y'all did fine, watch some netflix and go to bed. stop thinking about today's essays. we all missed some issues

Underoath
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:49 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby Underoath » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:07 am

robinhoodOO wrote:
Underoath wrote:
BuenAbogado wrote:If no adverse possession issue, how did you utilize the fact where L did not know that P took possession of the land?


that's exactly why I did AP


But, co-tenant can't adversely possess another co-tenant's interest. Gotta oust his ass


I forgot the rules for ouster lol =/

User avatar
publicservant101
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:58 am

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby publicservant101 » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:08 am

That said, I forgot all about dr once I got him out on --.Way to f up my later analysis if dr was supposed to be part of it!
Last edited by publicservant101 on Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

Underoath
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:49 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby Underoath » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:08 am

soj wrote:y'all did fine, watch some netflix and go to bed. stop thinking about today's essays. we all missed some issues


just laughed out loud

User avatar
robinhoodOO
Posts: 874
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby robinhoodOO » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:08 am

BrokenMouse wrote:
brotherdarkness wrote:
robinhoodOO wrote:
publicservant101 wrote:The doctor didn't move... I don't think?


Nah, P did


Srsly? Lol what the fuck was I reading today, because it clearly wasn't the facts.


The damn DO and P were on the same side of the column and the evil corp was from elsewhere.


Not so sure, but whatever :)
Last edited by robinhoodOO on Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Zaizei
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby Zaizei » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:09 am

I was wondering if DO actually moved but I could recall. What I know is that P didn't move, because he just was in the place treatment, he didn't intent to make the new state his home.

User avatar
BuenAbogado
Posts: 238
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 3:43 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby BuenAbogado » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:09 am

Did (c) of the PT require a lot of analysis or did it get dismissed because it wasn't stated in original complaint and there was no excuse?

I put a lot of analysis in there including experts and some other stuff. Hopefully that shouldn't have been part of a.

B was short though because he said "yes" and didn't have a good explanation per the last case.

What do you guys think?

User avatar
brotherdarkness
Posts: 3254
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:11 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby brotherdarkness » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:10 am

robinhoodOO wrote:
BrokenMouse wrote:
brotherdarkness wrote:
robinhoodOO wrote:
publicservant101 wrote:The doctor didn't move... I don't think?


Nah, P did


Srsly? Lol what the fuck was I reading today, because it clearly wasn't the facts.


The damn DO and P were on the same side of the column and the evil corp was from elsewhere.


I just text my buddy to make sure I wasn't losing my mind: P moved.


Lol. Apparently both P and Dr moved. I didn't notice either of those facts, and did not discuss changing residency at all. Apparently my super solid essay is now a total boondoggle. Dang.

User avatar
BuenAbogado
Posts: 238
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 3:43 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby BuenAbogado » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:10 am

robinhoodOO wrote:
BrokenMouse wrote:
brotherdarkness wrote:
robinhoodOO wrote:
publicservant101 wrote:The doctor didn't move... I don't think?


Nah, P did


Srsly? Lol what the fuck was I reading today, because it clearly wasn't the facts.


The damn DO and P were on the same side of the column and the evil corp was from elsewhere.


I just text my buddy to make sure I wasn't losing my mind: P moved.


He moved, but his move required a pennoyer v neff domicile analysis.

User avatar
smokeylarue
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby smokeylarue » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:11 am

Dont think he moved... just there for medical shit...

User avatar
robinhoodOO
Posts: 874
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby robinhoodOO » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:11 am

Underoath wrote:
robinhoodOO wrote:
Underoath wrote:
BuenAbogado wrote:If no adverse possession issue, how did you utilize the fact where L did not know that P took possession of the land?


that's exactly why I did AP


But, co-tenant can't adversely possess another co-tenant's interest. Gotta oust his ass


I forgot the rules for ouster lol =/


I did too and BSed it :/

User avatar
robinhoodOO
Posts: 874
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby robinhoodOO » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:11 am

smokeylarue wrote:Dont think he moved... just there for medical shit...


Agree to disagree here :)
Last edited by robinhoodOO on Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

BrokenMouse
im above average FICO buddy
Posts: 1352
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby BrokenMouse » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:12 am

.
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Reds622
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:42 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby Reds622 » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:13 am

Perhaps I'm missing something.. But how would P moving affect the analysis of Question 1 anyways? Unless we're only talking question 3..

Either way, it's all over now anyways.

Zaizei
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby Zaizei » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:13 am

robinhoodOO wrote:
smokeylarue wrote:Dont think he moved... just there for medical shit...


It literally said w/intent to remain

It said with intent to remain to receive treatment.

BrokenMouse
im above average FICO buddy
Posts: 1352
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby BrokenMouse » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:14 am

.
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Pleasye
Posts: 7970
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby Pleasye » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:15 am

Zaizei wrote:
robinhoodOO wrote:
smokeylarue wrote:Dont think he moved... just there for medical shit...


It literally said w/intent to remain

It said with intent to remain to receive treatment.

It said he intended to remain there "indefinitely"

Also it doesn't matter because it didn't affect the analysis either way and either conclusion was reasonable.

And the doctor didn't move.

BrokenMouse
im above average FICO buddy
Posts: 1352
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby BrokenMouse » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:16 am

lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

atticus89
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby atticus89 » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:17 am

People freaking out too much. Other people posting things they saw that you didn't see, but you may have issues that they didn't see. Further if your analysis was bad it doesn't matter if you spotted every single issue.

I've read essays that have received 70-80s and they miss a bunch of issues. You have one hour to write each question. The thing is somewhat subjective.
Last edited by atticus89 on Wed Jul 29, 2015 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

BrokenMouse
im above average FICO buddy
Posts: 1352
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby BrokenMouse » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:18 am

lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

BrokenMouse
im above average FICO buddy
Posts: 1352
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby BrokenMouse » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:18 am

lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
publicservant101
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:58 am

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby publicservant101 » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:20 am

I also kept wanting to bring in compulsory joinder somehow... But couldn't make it fit. But it kept coming to mind. Anyone mention it?

BrokenMouse
im above average FICO buddy
Posts: 1352
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby BrokenMouse » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:22 am

lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
robinhoodOO
Posts: 874
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:08 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby robinhoodOO » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:24 am

Zaizei wrote: It said with intent to remain to receive treatment.


Both. I pulled a Fromm and highlighted, circled, and underlined this shit when outlining haha
Last edited by robinhoodOO on Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

atticus89
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: July 2015 California Bar Exam

Postby atticus89 » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:27 am

I've read 65s (and higher) that were written poorly but had most of the issues. I've also read 65s and higher that missed several issues but were written really well with great analysis for the issues they had.

There are multiple paths to a 65. The conclusion matters less than your reasoning and path to get there.
Last edited by atticus89 on Wed Jul 29, 2015 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “Bar Exam Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests