. Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Alright bros lets not give each other panic attacks.
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:02 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Probably 10-13
- BarbellDreams
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:10 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
4-8 and took one day off every week completely. Idk, unless my MBE/Essays have a disproportionate amount of mortgages, covenants and ConLaw questions that make me go "Umm...yeah, so this is gonna be a guess." (especially Congress v. Executive separation of powers) I should be fine. I'm scoring in the mid-high 60s on the latest MBEs but I truly dont believe mixed sets represent what the exam will be like past set 5 or so. I haven't gotten a straight mailbox rule, offer/acceptance or is this hearsay question in ages. Instead I am dealing with remembering how wild deeds work.
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Damn, some brehs really put in mad work. I think we're all going to be fine.
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 2:25 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Keeping Fed Civ Pro, PA Civ Pro and NJ Civ Pro rules straight is really fucking with me.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:32 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
They have "evidence" he was connected to two other robberies, you don't know how much. Maybe not enough for an arrest. Or they haven't gotten to it yet.BarbellDreams wrote:A defendant, charged with armed robbery of a store, denied that he was the person who had robbed the store. In presenting the state's case, the prosecutor seeks to introduce evidence that the defendant had robbed two other stores in the past year.
Dude. If you guys know he robbed the other two stores in the past year and have the evidence how the hell is he not in jail for the other two robberies already and instead is out committing more robberies? Robberies run like 5-10 for a first offense. Did he get out on good behavior due to overcrowding or something?
- Bikeflip
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:01 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Yeah, I get that. I recall reading the question and saying to myself, "6th Amendment right to counsel doesn't apply here. Different crimes." Then I just went and choose A without reading much of the question or the other answers. Yay carelessness...kalvano wrote:
That's definitely something you need to be aware of on the exam. The offense-specific nature of the 6th Amendment seems to pop up a good bit. Since the question said that it was explicitly the 6th Amendment, Miranda isn't correct.
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Same. I've stopped studying NJ Civ Pro for now. I've reviewed the outline 2-3 times, and I don't plan on picking it back up 'til the night before the NJ bar. I know it's not the recommended approach, but I'll chance it.locusdelicti wrote:Keeping Fed Civ Pro, PA Civ Pro and NJ Civ Pro rules straight is really fucking with me.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
I wish Themis gave averages for the mix subjects. I wonder if the goal % is higher than average or what.
- Carlos Danger
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
I'm completely serious about this question. I'm taking NY and NJ. I have done absolutely nothing in terms of studying NJ law. Do you actually need to know NJ civ pro?TheBeard wrote:Same. I've stopped studying NJ Civ Pro for now. I've reviewed the outline 2-3 times, and I don't plan on picking it back up 'til the night before the NJ bar. I know it's not the recommended approach, but I'll chance it.locusdelicti wrote:Keeping Fed Civ Pro, PA Civ Pro and NJ Civ Pro rules straight is really fucking with me.
- Bikeflip
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:01 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Quick question: You can be charged with both a greater and lesser included offense (say robbery and larceny), but you cannot be convicted of both (if you're convicted of robbery, larceny merges into it), right?
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
You haven't studied NJ law because they test the MBE subjects. One of the essays is a Civ Pro essay and it could cover either Fed Civ Pro, NJ Civ Pro, or a combination of both.Carlos Danger wrote:I'm completely serious about this question. I'm taking NY and NJ. I have done absolutely nothing in terms of studying NJ law. Do you actually need to know NJ civ pro?TheBeard wrote:Same. I've stopped studying NJ Civ Pro for now. I've reviewed the outline 2-3 times, and I don't plan on picking it back up 'til the night before the NJ bar. I know it's not the recommended approach, but I'll chance it.locusdelicti wrote:Keeping Fed Civ Pro, PA Civ Pro and NJ Civ Pro rules straight is really fucking with me.
- Charles Barkley
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 9:56 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Correct.Bikeflip wrote:Quick question: You can be charged with both a greater and lesser included offense (say robbery and larceny), but you cannot be convicted of both (if you're convicted of robbery, larceny merges into it), right?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
What is the deal with felony murder. It merges with the felony that caused it right?
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:32 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
re-asking this again, sorry brehs. anyone got any clue how to roughly translate a Themis /100 score to the NY scaled essay score, like for seperac's calculator? I know we've got the themis averages displayed, but...
- Bikeflip
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:01 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Thanks breh.Charles Barkley wrote:Correct.Bikeflip wrote:Quick question: You can be charged with both a greater and lesser included offense (say robbery and larceny), but you cannot be convicted of both (if you're convicted of robbery, larceny merges into it), right?
- Charles Barkley
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 9:56 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Also correct.Desert Fox wrote:What is the deal with felony murder. It merges with the felony that caused it right?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Just to make sure: you mean the felony merges into the murder, right? If so, you're correct.Desert Fox wrote:What is the deal with felony murder. It merges with the felony that caused it right?
- Agoraphobia
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:30 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
It's only because my memory is so bad. I overcompensate.kalvano wrote:I'm going to look back at that post and cry when I fail.Agoraphobia wrote:Close to 8 most days. Sometimes 10.kalvano wrote:Probably a legit 6-8 hours a day.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:56 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
This shit is stressful. I want to quit studying but I'm too paranoid to stop. The test needs to get here already.
- Carlos Danger
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
ThanksTheBeard wrote:You haven't studied NJ law because they test the MBE subjects. One of the essays is a Civ Pro essay and it could cover either Fed Civ Pro, NJ Civ Pro, or a combination of both.Carlos Danger wrote:I'm completely serious about this question. I'm taking NY and NJ. I have done absolutely nothing in terms of studying NJ law. Do you actually need to know NJ civ pro?TheBeard wrote:Same. I've stopped studying NJ Civ Pro for now. I've reviewed the outline 2-3 times, and I don't plan on picking it back up 'til the night before the NJ bar. I know it's not the recommended approach, but I'll chance it.locusdelicti wrote:Keeping Fed Civ Pro, PA Civ Pro and NJ Civ Pro rules straight is really fucking with me.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Agoraphobia
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:30 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Larceny merges into robbery but not burglary. The elements of larceny are contained in robbery. So think of this way, it's impossible to commit a robbery without committing a larceny. But, you can commit a burglary without committing a larcency, because the felony you meant to commit inside the dwelling could be something else than larceny.Bikeflip wrote:Quick question: You can be charged with both a greater and lesser included offense (say robbery and larceny), but you cannot be convicted of both (if you're convicted of robbery, larceny merges into it), right?
- Carlos Danger
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Very good pointAgoraphobia wrote:Larceny merges into robbery but not burglary. The elements of larceny are contained in robbery. So think of this way, it's impossible to commit a robbery without committing a larceny. But, you can commit a burglary without committing a larcency, because the felony you meant to commit inside the dwelling could be something else than larceny.Bikeflip wrote:Quick question: You can be charged with both a greater and lesser included offense (say robbery and larceny), but you cannot be convicted of both (if you're convicted of robbery, larceny merges into it), right?
- Bikeflip
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:01 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Agoraphobia wrote:Larceny merges into robbery but not burglary. The elements of larceny are contained in robbery. So think of this way, it's impossible to commit a robbery without committing a larceny. But, you can commit a burglary without committing a larcency, because the felony you meant to commit inside the dwelling could be something else than larceny.Bikeflip wrote:Quick question: You can be charged with both a greater and lesser included offense (say robbery and larceny), but you cannot be convicted of both (if you're convicted of robbery, larceny merges into it), right?
Right right. You can break and enter into another's dwelling at night intending to burn the damn thing down.
Last edited by Bikeflip on Sat Jul 27, 2013 8:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Charles Barkley
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 9:56 pm
Re: THEMIS BAR REVIEW Hangout.
Noob commercial paper question here.
If A makes a note saying "A promises to give B $10,000." B then gives the note to C (assume C is a HDC) - does the fact that there was no consideration for the note matter?
Or does it only matter if C was not a HDC, because lack of consideration would be a personal defense?
Halp
If A makes a note saying "A promises to give B $10,000." B then gives the note to C (assume C is a HDC) - does the fact that there was no consideration for the note matter?
Or does it only matter if C was not a HDC, because lack of consideration would be a personal defense?
Halp
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login