jackassjim wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me what proportion of fun/interesting, but not necessarily practical courses, a Michigan student would be able to take during his JD studies. Here, I'm thinking about philosophy or history of law, law and econ, law and humanities, etc.
Of course, that might not be a wise investment; taking too many of those courses is probably not a very good strategy for job placement. Still, I'm curious. I know that the first year curriculum is pretty fixed, but I was wondering: is it possible to embark on JD studies at Michigan with simple intellectual curiosity, without the need to be too practical?
You can take tons of stuff like that. This is why I joke that all I do is take Con Law over and over again (many varieties). There are very few upper level requirements. You have to take Transnational Law. You have to take a class that fulfills the requirement of writing a paper. You have to take a class that fulfills your ethics requirement. That's about it.
A lot of people will tell you (and I'm definitely in this camp) to take whatever you want. You have to relearn the practical stuff in your bar course, even if you take it in law school, bc you've forgotten it by then and bc it's taught in more of a black letter law kind of way. There are certain classes I take with my career in mind, but I'm still taking them because I have an interest in them. If I'm not interested (or not interested enough to pass up some other class instead), I don't take it.