pretty solid. hoping for one of these positions after graduation with a lateral into international law.

Nice.

Don't know that it's to boost our rankings. I'd be pretty stoked about it if I were in a position to need the help.

I agree it's a win-win, but you have to be hitting the kool-aid pretty hard if you don't think it's about boosting the rankings.

You have to wonder though: would they put more effort into getting you a non-UVA-paid job if UVA-paid jobs didn't count for employment purposes in the USNWR rankings? I think they would.

I mean, do I think it's a factor? Sure, it's gotta at least be at the back of everyone's minds. But a primary motivation?

In my opinion, yes. UVA's gaming of medians via the ED tells me just how hard they play that game.

I assume this figure (11%) refers to the students who receive $2500/month stipends from UVA in exchange for taking any unpaid legal position. I have nothing but praise for the program. Sure, UVA is motivated somewhat by the rankings, but UVA is also much more generous than it needs to be. Last spring they told every unemployed 3L they would pay for most of the costs of bar registration and a bar prep course--which doesn't do anything for the rankings--and $2500/month is a lot more money than hiring unemployed graduates to be research assistants for $10/hour for a maximum of 10 hours/week, for example. Plus the program seems to be helping the students: last August 100 students (27%) were receiving the stipend, so if only 11% are still receiving the stipend nine months after graduation, more than half must have found permanent jobs. Two of the students I know who were on the stipend found good jobs through the connections they made at their unpaid positions--connections they would never have made if they were just employed by UVA as research assistants. This isn't just about gaming the rankings.

Ugh re-reading the ATL article sent chills up my spine. Do you remember if there was any rhyme or reason to the students who didn't get jobs? Or was it completely random?

Agree with everything Cavalier said. It's a rankings arm's race for sure, but this move is generous and genuinely helpful for the graduates. It's hard to feel to skeezy about a program that (a) everyone is doing, (b) everyone knows about, and (c) is obviously a force of goodness and light in the lives of our graduates.

I worry about the overall market effect these programs will have, however. Between firm deferral programs (we'll pay you to do public interest!) and law school temporary programs (we'll pay you to do public interest!) what about the poor saps who actually (a) want to do public interest and (b) earn a living? It's hard to compete with people that will do the job for free...

Can anyone comment on when incoming 1L's typically start moving into their apartments? My lease starts in the middle of July. I've been thinking about when I actually want to move in. I'm excited to get there considering my lease here ends at the end of May and I'll be living on my parents couch in between. At the same time, I don't want to get to Charlottesville and be bored out of my mind for a month if people aren't around.

You and Cavalier are just the whiter version of me and Doritos. Disagreeing with nothing.

From what I can gather, the US law school class of 2012 walked into a collective buzz saw at OCI. Our year was supposedly better, and your year should be better still. I hope.

[/quote]
From what I can gather, the US law school class of 2012 walked into a collective buzz saw at OCI. Our year was supposedly better, and your year should be better still. I hope.[/quote]

Here's to hoping.

If it doesn't work out there is always consulting o.O

Elie just loves sticking it to UVA for some reason. The rhyme or reason as to why certain students in the class of 2011 didn't get jobs was, as President Obama would so eloquently put it: math. There weren't enough SA jobs to go around. So firms did what they always do: they choose the people they wanted based on factors that have been discussed ad nauseum on this site (grades, fit, pre-law work experience, etc.) and everyone else was left fighting for the same handful of PI/government internships and RA jobs.

Yeah, ATL seems to really love to take on UVA. Because we know all the other schools in the T-14 are so perfect.

To those who remember class of 2011's OGI (in fall 2009), class of 2012 had a peachy time of it. The percentage of people getting SA jobs at high-paying firms went from ~45% to more like ~60%. Class of 2013 is probably 65% to 70%.

Still not back to the boom days of 80% or better. We'll probably never get there.

60-70% thru OGI or just got firm jobs regardless of method? I'm skeptical of both but moreso of the former. I could be wrong though.

OK, once and for all. Do 2L grades matter?

If you don't intend on clerking and plan to head straight to a firm, they don't matter much. No-offers for low grades don't occur. But keep in mind that there's still a lot of instability in the legal economy, and you might find yourself looking your new employment sooner than you think--for example, if your firm collapses like Dewey or Howrey. You shouldn't stress over grades but you shouldn't let them tank either if you can avoid it.

What a terrible thing for me to read at this point. Just terrible.

I wish to lobby for retroactive pass/fails. Michigan employs such a program and I don't want us to fall behind.

Be Calm & Go Look At That Excel Sheet We Made.