A forum for applicants and admitted students to ask law students and graduates about law school and the practice of law.
9 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 7:43 pm
The case is pretty old I believe. The premise of the case was that the parties contracted for goods, Party A didn’t end up supplying the goods, Party B went out and bought the most expensive replacement they could find, then sued Party A for reimbursement. The Court held that Party A was only liable for the reasonable cost of replacing the product they failed to deliver. So it wasn’t specific performance, maybe indemnification?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: androstan and 1 guest