Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

A forum for applicants and admitted students to ask law students and graduates about law school and the practice of law.
User avatar
suits00
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:56 pm

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Postby suits00 » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:30 am

Btw--I finally figured out the answer to your earlier post. Please become a Chirporactor. With reasoning like that you'd be f*cked as an attorney (assuming you could even pass the LSAT, law school, and BAR).
Last edited by suits00 on Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
chiro
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:33 am

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Postby chiro » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:30 am

suits00 wrote:
chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?



Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.


Can someone translate for me?


Do you not know what a revocated degree is? Is THAT the problem?

User avatar
kalvano
Posts: 11721
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Postby kalvano » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:30 am

suits00 wrote:
chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?



Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.


Can someone translate for me?


Image

User avatar
suits00
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:56 pm

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Postby suits00 » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:31 am

chiro wrote:
suits00 wrote:
chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?



Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.


Can someone translate for me?


Do you not know what a revocated degree is? Is THAT the problem?


No, it's your faulty reasoning that I can't understand. Btw--it's "REVOKED", not "revocated".
Last edited by suits00 on Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:34 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
chiro
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:33 am

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Postby chiro » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:31 am

170, and not on any silly childs pretest either.
Thanks for the opinion though. Much appreciated.


suits00 wrote:Btw--I finally figured out the answer to your earlier post. Please become a Chirporactor. With reasoning like that you'd be f*cked as an attorney (assuming you could even pass the LSAT, law school, and BAR).

User avatar
chiro
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:33 am

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Postby chiro » Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:06 am

Well, Saint or otherwise at least the mans dream lives on.......

http://news.yahoo.com/samuel-l-jackson- ... 06076.html

According to the New York Post, the "Pulp Fiction" legend repeatedly dropped the N-word during his cover story interview.


“I voted for Barack because he was black. ’Cuz that’s why other folks vote for other people — because they look like them,” Jackson said. "That’s American politics, pure and simple. [Obama’s] message didn’t mean sh-t to me. In the end, he’s a politician. I just hoped he would do some of what he said he was gonna do."

“When it comes down to it, they wouldn’t have elected a [bleep]," Jackson said. "Because, what’s a [bleep]? A [bleep] is scary. Obama ain’t scary at all. [Bleeps] don’t have beers at the White House. [Bleeps] don’t let some white dude, while you in the middle of a speech, call [him] a liar" -- an apparent reference to Rep. Joe Wilson's "You lie!" outburst during Obama's health care address to a joint session of Congress in 2009.

Jackson continued, "A [bleep] would have stopped the meeting right there and said, ‘Who the [bleep] said that?’ I hope Obama gets scary in the next four years, ’cuz he ain’t gotta worry about getting re-elected.”

Defending his repeated use of the racial epithet, Jackson said it "became a part of my vocabulary when I was born."

User avatar
chiro
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:33 am

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Postby chiro » Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:27 am

chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?



Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.


Can someone translate for me?[/quote]

Do you not know what a revocated degree is? Is THAT the problem?[/quote]

No, it's your faulty reasoning that I can't understand. Btw--it's "REVOKED", not "revocated".[/quote]






http://www.howard.edu/policy/academic/d ... cation.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym

wow.......just wow.........

Mal Reynolds
Posts: 12630
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Postby Mal Reynolds » Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:32 am

Philosopher King? Is that you?

User avatar
SilverE2
Posts: 931
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:04 pm

Re: Was Doctor king a dueshbag?

Postby SilverE2 » Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:37 am

chiro wrote:
chiro wrote:
kalvano wrote:Which one would be more irritating to you?



Lots of lawyers are accused of cheating in law school and yet still use the title "lawyer"
Untill the degree is revocated I don't see the difference? The title remains and use of a title at that point is no different than anyone else with same qualifications using it.


Can someone translate for me?


Do you not know what a revocated degree is? Is THAT the problem?[/quote]

No, it's your faulty reasoning that I can't understand. Btw--it's "REVOKED", not "revocated".[/quote]






http://www.howard.edu/policy/academic/d ... cation.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym

wow.......just wow.........[/quote]

Holy shit, you seriously can't be this stupid.

Revoke is a verb. Revocation is a noun. You don't take a noun and add an -ed to turn it into the past tense of a verb. What the fuck is wrong with you.




Return to “Ask a Law Student / Graduate”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AZnative and 8 guests