Since nobody has had both, it is a bit of a pointless discussion, isn't it?
I got what would be called a "good grade" on his exam.
And unless you are one of those two, which the chances of you being are low, that is a negative.
Dude apparently got 5 good reviews on his evals. It isn't just me, people who didn't do well, or a preference against his teaching style.
So you're saying that a discussion that involves an aspect of something you haven't personally experienced is a "pointless discussion"? By that definition than almost every discussion is pointless, great argument.
Also, all of the people who gave him a negative review could have done so because they didn't like his teaching style, so that statistic is irrelevant to disproving my point.
The most interesting statistic in my perspective is that, of all the people who allegedly gave Konig a bad review, you're the only one who constantly takes the time to bad mouth him in the forums. If you wanna offer constructive criticism on how to do well in Konig's class despite what you believe to be his poor teaching skills, go right ahead.
Posting hateful and negative comments just looks poorly on you, not Konig.
P.S. I'm done discussing this, back to studying.